Forums46
Topics538,006
Posts9,731,706
Members87,055
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
40mm vs 50mm - Pros/Cons
#8260143
05/08/21 12:45 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,813
Texican
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,813 |
Looking at a Leupold VX3HD 3.5-10 scope. I like the lower profile of the 40mm objective, but am I giving up too much light? **Full disclosure, not sure what rifle I will put this on yet.
|
|
|
Re: 40mm vs 50mm - Pros/Cons
[Re: Texican]
#8260306
05/08/21 04:58 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173 |
You're giving up a smaller field of view. At 3.5X, I bet that scope will get you past legal shooting time.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: 40mm vs 50mm - Pros/Cons
[Re: Texican]
#8260401
05/08/21 07:30 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,508
syncerus
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,508 |
Read the section in this article on exit pupil or EP.
NRA Patriot Benefactor & DSC Lifer
|
|
|
Re: 40mm vs 50mm - Pros/Cons
[Re: Texican]
#8262378
05/11/21 03:00 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,813
Texican
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,813 |
Thanks guys. And forgive me if I have confused myself here...
Based on EP and FOV, it seems the 50mm obj is the better unit to go with??
|
|
|
Re: 40mm vs 50mm - Pros/Cons
[Re: Texican]
#8262412
05/11/21 04:13 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
patriot07
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564 |
Yeah 50mm is better if you can fit it on your gun comfortably.
|
|
|
Re: 40mm vs 50mm - Pros/Cons
[Re: Texican]
#8262435
05/11/21 10:14 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,221
wp75169
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,221 |
You do get a better exit pupil at a given power with a bigger objective, but it does NOT effect the FOV when comparing otherwise identical scopes with different objectives. You also gain 2-3 oz going from 40-50mm so if weight is a consideration then that’s relevant.
|
|
|
Re: 40mm vs 50mm - Pros/Cons
[Re: Texican]
#8262468
05/11/21 11:40 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,335
onlysmith&wesson
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 6,335 |
I have a VX-3HD 4.5-14 x 40 on the way. Hope to have it bore sighted then ready to hunt pretty quick. I'm going to do a side by side look at dusk against these: I've had the VX6 7 years, the VX5 maybe 4. I wanted a smaller obj, and lighter scope for the Mohawk I posted last week.
An unethical shot is one you take, that you know you shouldn't.
|
|
|
Re: 40mm vs 50mm - Pros/Cons
[Re: Texican]
#8262916
05/11/21 06:56 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,508
syncerus
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,508 |
The short version is that, all things being equal, a larger objective gathers more light, but weighs more, is bulkier and can ruin the balance of many rifles. The larger objective also allows one to use a higher level of magnification in lower light (see EP in the article linked above).That out of the way, all things are not equal, and the previous statement only applies to otherwise identical versions of the same scope. It's also worth pointing out that most individuals over 30 and almost all individuals over 50 have eyes that can accept only so much light, so there's a point of diminishing returns. My personal takeaway is that I prefer high quality scopes with smaller objectives, except when I specifically plan on shooting in very low light, like hunting hogs at twilight. Finally, if low light performance is important to you, your choice of reticle is very important, meaning you'll want illumination or coarse crosshairs at the very least.
Last edited by syncerus; 05/11/21 06:58 PM. Reason: reticle
NRA Patriot Benefactor & DSC Lifer
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|