texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
cpen13, Huntinkid, garey, SteveG, justin77
72053 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,796
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,526
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,920
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,992
Posts9,731,487
Members87,053
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245031 04/22/21 01:15 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,847
D
DannyB Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,847
Louisiana Sen. Kennedy was just on the Tucker Carlson show. You should have heard what he said about some BS that AOC said about police. He said something like it "is hard to believe somebody reaches her age and believes such drivel." He lays out a number of other typical comical things that he is great at, and finishes by saying that "jellyfish have survived millions of years without a brain."

Re: the reason for police [Re: DannyB] #8245053 04/22/21 01:42 AM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,763
T
Tin Head Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 9,763
Originally Posted by DannyB
Louisiana Sen. Kennedy was just on the Tucker Carlson show. You should have heard what he said about some BS that AOC said about police. He said something like it "is hard to believe somebody reaches her age and believes such drivel." He lays out a number of other typical comical things that he is great at, and finishes by saying that "jellyfish have survived millions of years without a brain."

commies disguised as SJWs


[Linked Image]
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245095 04/22/21 02:14 AM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,701
6
603Country Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
6
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,701
If we defund all police departments, and crime goes wild, then I suppose the government will say we need a National Police Department. And, of course, that would mean that no citizens need weapons of any type. Like I said, hide grandpa’s old Model 97 Winchester, just in case.


Not my monkeys, not my circus...
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245163 04/22/21 03:41 AM
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,115
R
Ranch Dawg Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,115
Buy more bullets, bad days are coming. Kinda like Bad Moon Rising, but worse.


THE ROAD GOES ON FOREVER AND THE PARTY NEVER ENDS.

F##K YOU JOE BIDEN !!!!!
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245256 04/22/21 11:15 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
Originally Posted by Texas buckeye
Let me preface this by saying I am in no way anti-police, or even neutral police, I am full blooded pro-police and pro-military/firefighter/emt/etc. These guys do work most people want nothing to do with, and they are underpaid, undervalued, and scrutinized if anything at all goes wrong on their job.

Another thread got me thinking, "What if we did lose the police force?"

What would that look like in the US if there was no police force. I am a believer the public needs some sort of peace-keeper or someone to help maintain the peace. In a very rudimentary manner, police are simply peace keepers. I know their job goes much deeper than that, but in the end the police serve the public, not the individual. I think most of us can agree to that concept. So without police, we would see a break down in the publics ability to maintain order and "peace" in the form of third world traffic, petty theft (see that already in places that choose not to prosecute petty theft), and other minor crimes against property and person.

But would we see the public become scared of personal harm or death? I don't think so. My reasoning would be the 2A. Just as in the "wild west" there would be a system of instant justice given for people who did people wrong, and those were carried out quickly and swiftly. I have a feeling the same would happen in todays world. We would see a bunch of self inflicted justice carried out and the population may be a little more at ease since justice would be dealt at the end of a barrel or with rope instead of with manipulated unfair trials and limp wristed liberal justice warriors.

Thoughts?


We just need to look back in history to answer that question, back when some states were still territory's. The town folk would get together and handle problems themselves, Vigilante justice was swift and brutal, your basic outlaw feared the vigilante justice far more than he did established law and order. There's a lot of tree's out there and a lot of problems left hanging from them.

In reality I see something worse happening. We've seen a glimpse or two of it in the past and fixing to see it again in Minneapolis. a federal investigation into a police department. There's nothing the Federal Government and those on the left would like more than to Federalize all law enforcement in the US. This puts them at street level in every state and street in the US.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: the reason for police [Re: nsmike] #8245270 04/22/21 11:33 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
Originally Posted by nsmike
Originally Posted by John2
Australia's prime minister at the time, John Howard, had taken office just six weeks earlier at the head of a center-right coalition. He quickly drew a very clear conclusion from the Port Arthur killing,that killed 35 innocent people: Australia had too many guns, and they were too easy to get.

It looks like he took a shot at it and was pretty successful in doing what he did.But parts of Australia is sparsely populated.

What people conveniently fail to mention is that the Mental Health System was overhauled at the same time. A very high percentage of mass shooting are because the Mental Health System failed.


This one I've been preaching for years, it's the 800 lb Gorilla.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: the reason for police [Re: Lazyjack] #8245274 04/22/21 11:36 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
Originally Posted by Lazyjack
The Blue Line is the only thing stopping instant justice now.


Heard an interview yesterday from a Chicago Officer who pretty much said the same thing. It's a double edged sword.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: the reason for police [Re: Opening Day] #8245282 04/22/21 11:43 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
Originally Posted by Opening Day
I agree 100% To many people have turned away from God and there in lies the real problem. Throw in teachers as well being overworked, underpaid and undervalued.


Sorry but I'm not putting teachers in the same category as law enforcement.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: the reason for police [Re: HWY_MAN] #8245284 04/22/21 11:43 AM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,408
C
Choctaw Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,408
Originally Posted by HWY_MAN
Originally Posted by nsmike
Originally Posted by John2
Australia's prime minister at the time, John Howard, had taken office just six weeks earlier at the head of a center-right coalition. He quickly drew a very clear conclusion from the Port Arthur killing,that killed 35 innocent people: Australia had too many guns, and they were too easy to get.

It looks like he took a shot at it and was pretty successful in doing what he did.But parts of Australia is sparsely populated.

What people conveniently fail to mention is that the Mental Health System was overhauled at the same time. A very high percentage of mass shooting are because the Mental Health System failed.


This one I've been preaching for years, it's the 800 lb Gorilla.


It’s easier and much more convenient to blame the gun rather than the nut wielding it.

Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245285 04/22/21 11:45 AM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,113
S
soooo Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,113
LAPD must curtail use of “less lethal” rounds, court says. A U.S. District Court judge in California granted a preliminary injunction to Black Lives Matter protesters who sued the police department for using projectiles against crowds during demonstrations on multiple occasions in the last year. More from The Trace: Experts told us last June that less lethal weapons can still kill and were likely to escalate conflict, and numerous protesters across the country have sued police for injuries related to the firing of the projectiles.

They just can't win.

Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245286 04/22/21 11:49 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Grizz Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,221
Originally Posted by Texas buckeye
Let me preface this by saying I am in no way anti-police, or even neutral police, I am full blooded pro-police and pro-military/firefighter/emt/etc. These guys do work most people want nothing to do with, and they are underpaid, undervalued, and scrutinized if anything at all goes wrong on their job.

Another thread got me thinking, "What if we did lose the police force?"

What would that look like in the US if there was no police force. I am a believer the public needs some sort of peace-keeper or someone to help maintain the peace. In a very rudimentary manner, police are simply peace keepers. I know their job goes much deeper than that, but in the end the police serve the public, not the individual. I think most of us can agree to that concept. So without police, we would see a break down in the publics ability to maintain order and "peace" in the form of third world traffic, petty theft (see that already in places that choose not to prosecute petty theft), and other minor crimes against property and person.

But would we see the public become scared of personal harm or death? I don't think so. My reasoning would be the 2A. Just as in the "wild west" there would be a system of instant justice given for people who did people wrong, and those were carried out quickly and swiftly. I have a feeling the same would happen in todays world. We would see a bunch of self inflicted justice carried out and the population may be a little more at ease since justice would be dealt at the end of a barrel or with rope instead of with manipulated unfair trials and limp wristed liberal justice warriors.

Thoughts?


There would definitely be some of that, but the big fly in the ointment is the fact our society as a whole doesn't have the spine to "take care of business" anymore. I think the people who did have the stones to do what needed to be done would be such a small percentage of the country that they would be looked at as the lunatic fringe of society. The vast majority of the country would be run by the criminals.


[Linked Image] [Linked Image]
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245287 04/22/21 11:54 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
The federalization of local law enforcement

Just a small part of the article.

Quote
National Unionization
House Resolution 413 — the oddly-named Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act — has a stated purpose of extending collective bargaining rights to all first responders. Doug Stafford from the National Right to Work Committee believes this legislation has greater implications and grants the federal government “broad power to impose the terms and conditions of employment for ... public safety workers and local and state governments.”

Should this legislation become law, it’s unlikely that a newly-established national union would allow localities to lay off police officers. The result would be that localities would either have to raise taxes after federal funding ran out or ask for additional federal funding, creating a permanent dependency that will foster federal control over local policing practices.

Though a rapid transition to a federalized police force is unlikely here in America, an incremental shift to greater federal control is already occurring. These efforts will be difficult to forestall as Washington plays an increasingly intrusive role in local law enforcement.


https://www.police1.com/patrol-issu...-local-law-enforcement-qTg3rQeVcDWOyAJL/


Last edited by HWY_MAN; 04/22/21 11:54 AM.

Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: the reason for police [Re: HWY_MAN] #8245298 04/22/21 12:05 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 91,416
bill oxner Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 91,416
You just told them.


Quail hunting is like walking into, and out of a beautiful painting all day long. Gene Hill


[Linked Image]




Re: the reason for police [Re: Grizz] #8245300 04/22/21 12:10 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
Quote
I think the people who did have the stones to do what needed to be done would be such a small percentage of the country that they would be looked at as the lunatic fringe of society.


Not much different than the American Revolution, only about 45% supported it and far less of them fought in it, many in this country took arms with the Brit's. Those with the stones won't be winning any popularity contests. Look at the percentage of Americans who join the military every year, it hovers at just over 1 percent. Some say only 3 percent of the colonies took part in the Revolution, I personally think that number is larger.

Last edited by HWY_MAN; 04/22/21 12:18 PM.

Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245304 04/22/21 12:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 91,416
bill oxner Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 91,416

[Linked Image]


Horse lover myself.


Quail hunting is like walking into, and out of a beautiful painting all day long. Gene Hill


[Linked Image]




Re: the reason for police [Re: Grizz] #8245322 04/22/21 12:40 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,408
C
Choctaw Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,408
Originally Posted by Grizz
Originally Posted by Texas buckeye
Let me preface this by saying I am in no way anti-police, or even neutral police, I am full blooded pro-police and pro-military/firefighter/emt/etc. These guys do work most people want nothing to do with, and they are underpaid, undervalued, and scrutinized if anything at all goes wrong on their job.

Another thread got me thinking, "What if we did lose the police force?"

What would that look like in the US if there was no police force. I am a believer the public needs some sort of peace-keeper or someone to help maintain the peace. In a very rudimentary manner, police are simply peace keepers. I know their job goes much deeper than that, but in the end the police serve the public, not the individual. I think most of us can agree to that concept. So without police, we would see a break down in the publics ability to maintain order and "peace" in the form of third world traffic, petty theft (see that already in places that choose not to prosecute petty theft), and other minor crimes against property and person.

But would we see the public become scared of personal harm or death? I don't think so. My reasoning would be the 2A. Just as in the "wild west" there would be a system of instant justice given for people who did people wrong, and those were carried out quickly and swiftly. I have a feeling the same would happen in todays world. We would see a bunch of self inflicted justice carried out and the population may be a little more at ease since justice would be dealt at the end of a barrel or with rope instead of with manipulated unfair trials and limp wristed liberal justice warriors.

Thoughts?


There would definitely be some of that, but the big fly in the ointment is the fact our society as a whole doesn't have the spine to "take care of business" anymore. I think the people who did have the stones to do what needed to be done would be such a small percentage of the country that they would be looked at as the lunatic fringe of society. The vast majority of the country would be run by the criminals.


Yep, totally agree. It's easy and fun to think about hypothetical scenarios but it is totally different when you are facing it for real and there is no help coming.

Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245357 04/22/21 01:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,113
S
soooo Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 6,113
Good morning, Bulletin readers. A day after the guilty verdict in the Derek Chauvin trial, the U.S. attorney general launched a federal investigation in policing, previewing one of the Biden administration’s key reform goals. That story and more, in your Thursday roundup.— Tom Kutsch, newsletter editor
WHAT TO KNOW TODAY

DOJ launches civil rights investigation into Minneapolis police misconduct. Such investigations were all but abandoned during the Trump administration, and last summer ex-AG Bill Barr declined to call for one in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder. “Yesterday's verdict in the state criminal trial does not address potentially systemic policing issues in Minneapolis,” Attorney General Merrick Garland said in his announcement. The mayor and all but one member of the Minneapolis City Council released statements praising the probe. Looking forward: If a pattern and practice investigation reveals widespread systemic failures and abuses in policing, it can lead to a consent decree whereby the federal government and a local police department agree on a series of reforms. Garland last week overturned a Trump administration near-ban on consent decrees, which the Obama DOJ utilized on 14 occasions, including in Baltimore, Chicago, and Ferguson, Missouri.

Understanding the generational divide in community violence outreach. In a recent must-read interview, Marlon Peterson, a staunch critic of the criminal justice system, offers his vision of a reimagined public safety system. It’s a fascinating look at the progressive end of the police reform debate, but also offers a unique perspective on how community-led violence programs — and the people who run them — age. Peterson helped launch a New York chapter of Cure Violence, perhaps the most visible national intervention program in the U.S., which deploys outreach workers to de-escalate street conflicts:
On the need to rebrand: “I also think Cure Violence has to be aware that it needs to be able to constantly rebrand itself. When I came home a decade ago, Cure Violence was cool. After a while, you just some old dudes, and it's not as effective. It doesn’t speak to what young people are dealing with now … That's another reason why violence interrupters need to be able to be moved up and out into other and bigger things.”
Columbus leaders, advocates question need for fatal use of force against 16-year-old Ma’Khia Bryant. The teenager was involved in a violent encounter with other girls, leading to a 911 call about an attempted stabbing. A responding officer shot her four times within seconds of arriving on the scene. Officer body-worn camera video was released, but family members and other leaders are questioning the use of force. “We must push for a new culture in Columbus where guns are not the final answer to every threat,” read a statement from the city council president. “Was it necessary to shoot? Couldn’t officers have used another option to defuse and de-escalate?” said the president of the Columbus Urban League.

Re: the reason for police [Re: Choctaw] #8245426 04/22/21 01:57 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
Quote
Yep, totally agree. It's easy and fun to think about hypothetical scenarios but it is totally different when you are facing it for real and there is no help coming.


Yep! Thinking you know what you'll do and having to find out what you'll do is two different stories.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: the reason for police [Re: Wool E. Booger] #8245455 04/22/21 02:26 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,544
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,544
Originally Posted by Wool E. Booger
Originally Posted by Wilhunt
Originally Posted by Opening Day
I agree 100% To many people have turned away from God and there in lies the real problem. Throw in teachers as well being overworked, underpaid and undervalued.


What teacher did not know, it is a low paying profession and has been that way for years?


My daughter is a teacher, and yes she knew it was a low paying profession, but that doesn’t make it right or excuse undervaluing what I consider to be a noble profession.


I graduated with several friends who became teachers. I have several family members who are teachers. I don't believe they are under paid at all. I don't think any of the ones i know feel under paid. Naturally if you wanted to pay them more for the same job they would take it. I know here on the THF we all make bank LOL but consulting statistics from the census bureau etc. teachers aren't so bad off. None of the ones I know work for a tiny school district in west/north/BFE Texas either though.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245460 04/22/21 02:29 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,544
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,544
If we are going to live our lives "like the old west" which I assume is based on movies since none of us are old enough to be from the "old west", you will be holding your life in the palm of your hand every time you have a confrontation with another individual. I dont want that, ive got a lot i want to live for. I dont want to have a traffic accident and have it settled by the fastest draw at 40 paces... but then again it would likely be great for population control.

Long live the popo.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: the reason for police [Re: redchevy] #8245483 04/22/21 02:44 PM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 14,207
H
Hudbone Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
H
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 14,207
Originally Posted by redchevy
If we are going to live our lives "like the old west" which I assume is based on movies since none of us are old enough to be from the "old west", you will be holding your life in the palm of your hand every time you have a confrontation with another individual. I dont want that, ive got a lot i want to live for. I dont want to have a traffic accident and have it settled by the fastest draw at 40 paces... but then again it would likely be great for population control.

Long live the popo.


In the scenario so described, you will learn to avoid people

Re: the reason for police [Re: redchevy] #8245590 04/22/21 04:15 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,796
dogcatcher Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 110,796
Originally Posted by redchevy
If we are going to live our lives "like the old west" which I assume is based on movies since none of us are old enough to be from the "old west", you will be holding your life in the palm of your hand every time you have a confrontation with another individual. I dont want that, ive got a lot i want to live for. I dont want to have a traffic accident and have it settled by the fastest draw at 40 paces... but then again it would likely be great for population control.

Long live the popo.
We already have some of that going on in society, it is called road rage.


Combat Infantryman, the ultimate hunter where the prey shoots back.
_____________"Illegitimus non carborundum est"_______________

[Linked Image]
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245601 04/22/21 04:28 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 9,185
H
hook_n_line Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
H
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 9,185
When I was 8 my great grandfather said it was way worse than movies portrayed the old west. He said there were killings on the streets and no one was called out. They just walked up and shot. The original lawmen were usually criminals themselves as were\are politicians. He said it took criminals to catch criminals and liars to make people think it was alright to give in to politics. I can't say all lawmen are bad and I can't say they are all good but without them things could be worse.


Sometimes it's hard being me! But somebody has to do it.
Re: the reason for police [Re: Texas buckeye] #8245605 04/22/21 04:30 PM
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 14,207
H
Hudbone Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
H
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 14,207
Without the thin blue line, thuggery will dominate

Re: the reason for police [Re: dogcatcher] #8245610 04/22/21 04:32 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,544
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,544
Originally Posted by dogcatcher
Originally Posted by redchevy
If we are going to live our lives "like the old west" which I assume is based on movies since none of us are old enough to be from the "old west", you will be holding your life in the palm of your hand every time you have a confrontation with another individual. I dont want that, ive got a lot i want to live for. I dont want to have a traffic accident and have it settled by the fastest draw at 40 paces... but then again it would likely be great for population control.

Long live the popo.
We already have some of that going on in society, it is called road rage.

Imagine what road rage would be without the consequences we now have.


It's hell eatin em live
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3