texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
garey, SteveG, justin77, Tjh, Clint Mcmullen
72051 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,525
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,911
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,968
Posts9,731,170
Members87,051
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
MInimal scope clearance question #8160028 02/08/21 01:41 AM
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 735
B
bull279 Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 735
I have a Savage 110 Scout in .308, I put an inexpensive BSA pistol scope on it using low Leupold rings. The rear of the scope is BARELY making contact with the M1913 rails. I believe that a single plastic shim from the scope ring package should help the scope body clear the rails. My question is, will this be enough clearance? I do not plan on having a rear cover, so that is not an issue. I also don't want the scope sticking up way high, I want as compact of an assembly as I can get. Thanks


Aut viam inveniam aut faciam

U.S. Army Military Police (ABN) 1998-2003
Re: MInimal scope clearance question [Re: bull279] #8160990 02/08/21 10:10 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,872
G
GLC Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
G
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,872
If you can slide a dollar bill between them you should be ok.


Re: MInimal scope clearance question [Re: bull279] #8160998 02/08/21 10:16 PM
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 285
G
George S Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
G
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 285
It doesn't matter. That BSA scope will fail soon enough. smirk laugh

Seriously, a .308 doesn't kick enough to make the scope flex, so clearance shouldn't be an issue.


Oderint dum metuant - Lucius Accius
Re: MInimal scope clearance question [Re: bull279] #8161516 02/09/21 03:55 AM
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 735
B
bull279 Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 735
OK thanks. I also figured since it was on the rails.barrel slap shouldn't be an issue especially since it is only the rear lens that is affected. The front is well clear of the gun.


Aut viam inveniam aut faciam

U.S. Army Military Police (ABN) 1998-2003
Re: MInimal scope clearance question [Re: bull279] #8164692 02/11/21 04:56 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,183
M
Mike Honcho Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
M
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 6,183
Food for thought. I used to try and get every scope as close to barrel as possible. Went to first PRS match and a guy asked if I could get a consistent cheek weld having to have my head tilted so much. I looked around and noticed I had the lowest mounted scope at the entire shoot. From that day forward I never worried about how close I got it. All that matters now is cheek weld regardless of how close to the bore I am.


“Two things that define an individual what you do when you have everything, and what you do when you have nothing."


Re: MInimal scope clearance question [Re: Mike Honcho] #8165182 02/11/21 05:01 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,642
Q
QuitShootinYoungBucks Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Q
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,642
Originally Posted by jorge
Food for thought. I used to try and get every scope as close to barrel as possible. Went to first PRS match and a guy asked if I could get a consistent cheek weld having to have my head tilted so much. I looked around and noticed I had the lowest mounted scope at the entire shoot. From that day forward I never worried about how close I got it. All that matters now is cheek weld regardless of how close to the bore I am.


He didn't get this one very close, seemed to work out for him.


[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]

https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3