|
Forums45
Topics597,457
Posts11,219,196
Members83,086
| |
Most Online19,184
Feb 5th, 2020
|
|
|
 Re: Leica is getting into the thermal clip on and monocular market - The CALONOX
[Re: Pig_Popper]
#8153407
02/03/21 03:22 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470
syncerus
Veteran Tracker
|
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,470 |
It looks like a veritable stampede of new players in the thermal market.
NRA Patron & DSC Lifer
|
|
|
|
Re: Leica is getting into the thermal clip on and monocular market - The CALONOX
[Re: Pig_Popper]
#8153705
02/03/21 01:53 PM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 7,137
Double Naught Spy
THF Trophy Hunter
|
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 7,137 |
I just noticed and am surprised that the 640 version with nearly 3x the resolution (327680 pixles) has less than 50% better overall detection, recognition, and identification capabilities of the 384 (110512 pixels). Is that the same with other thermals?
Range/resolution (calculated for image subject 1.7 m x 0.5 m (66.9 inch x 20.0 inch))
Detection range/Resolution 2000 m/2 pixels (2187 yrd/2 pixels)
Recognition range/Resolution 700 m/6 pixels (766 yrd/6 pixels)
Identification range/Resolution 350 m/12 pixels (383 yrd/12 pixels)
Detection range/resolution 3000 m/2 pixels (3281 yrd/2 pixels)
Recognition range/resolution 1000 m/6 pixels (1094 yrd/6 pixels)
Identification range/resolutin 500 m/12 pixels (547 yrd/12 pixels)
|
|
|
|
