Forums46
Topics537,041
Posts9,719,733
Members86,989
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: wp75169]
#8143891
01/26/21 01:56 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039
HicksHunter
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039 |
For the sake of understanding let’s quit using the words “harmonics” and “sine wave”. Both are correct but for the sake of understanding let’s call it “barrel whip”. As in the movement a whip makes when you snap it.
Everyone may already be on the same page but I don’t think so.
Which way is the tail of the whip (barrel) pointed when the bullet exits, up or down? This makes about as much difference at close ranges as compensating for spin drift. Then explain why we do load development instead of just loading everything to max? It’s not uncommon to have big groups in between two good ones. It’s suggested you will find two good nodes, one low and one high. They’re referring to powder charge and velocity, but often the faster load will print lower on the 100 yard target. Hmmm.... wonder if those two nodes are the top and bottom of the arc on the sine wave where the barrel is static for a moment before changing directions? I think JG covered that on the last page though. I guess we have to agree to disagree. Help me understand this. You guys are saying that if you are testing a series of powder charges from low to high at 100 yards, instead of seeing a general trend of the bullets hitting lower and lower until you hit max charge, you will see oscillations up and down in POI of 2" and more? You aren't simply describing finding an accuracy node, you are implying that the barrel is whipping so severely and shifting your POI that no trend can be deduced!
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8143986
01/26/21 03:25 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,958
cxjcherokec
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,958 |
Here is a real world experience Hicks, proving its harmonics. My sons 6.5CM prints a 0 with 140gr AMAX. Put on the AAC can and note there is a POI shift 1" lower than w/o. MV stayed the same, same lot, same bullet, everything is 100% the same minus adding the can. THAT proves harmonics, without a doubt.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8143991
01/26/21 03:27 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,442
kmon11
junior
|
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,442 |
Barrels move, vibrate/whip/what ever. Short stiff barrels do less than long thin barrels but all experience it to an extent. We that are reloaders looking for precision find out "node" for accuracy which generally will be when the barrel is moving less at the time the bullet exits the barrel. Different things have been used over the years to try and minimize the amount of movement. Many production manufactures leave a wood bump in their wood stocks near the end of the forearm to provide a dampening of the resonance of the barrel when firing to reduce the harmonic shifts when shooting. Remington and Sako are a couple that certainly have. Barrel tuners used in 22s are also employed by come in centerfire, think Browning BOSS. There are some interesting videos showing barrel whip using high speed cameras to catch it. Muzzle breaks and other devices enhance it but the bullet has left th barrel before the whip caused by them happens yet there is movement while the bullet is in the barrel.
lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true Mainstream news might be fun to watch
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: cxjcherokec]
#8144016
01/26/21 03:46 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039
HicksHunter
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039 |
Here is a real world experience Hicks, proving its harmonics. My sons 6.5CM prints a 0 with 140gr AMAX. Put on the AAC can and note there is a POI shift 1" lower than w/o. MV stayed the same, same lot, same bullet, everything is 100% the same minus adding the can. THAT proves harmonics, without a doubt. And then as he changes his load, what happens to his POI? I'm sorry, but hanging a weight off the end of a barrel is not conclusive proof that ammunition changes harmonics enough to shift POI 2" or more at 100yd. The question is "why do heavier bullets hit higher at this distance," and the only real answer is "trajectory differences."
Last edited by HicksHunter; 01/26/21 03:47 PM.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144033
01/26/21 03:59 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085 |
Here is a real world experience Hicks, proving its harmonics. My sons 6.5CM prints a 0 with 140gr AMAX. Put on the AAC can and note there is a POI shift 1" lower than w/o. MV stayed the same, same lot, same bullet, everything is 100% the same minus adding the can. THAT proves harmonics, without a doubt. And then as he changes his load, what happens to his POI? I'm sorry, but hanging a weight off the end of a barrel is not conclusive proof that ammunition changes harmonics enough to shift POI 2" or more at 100yd. The question is "why do heavier bullets hit higher at this distance," and the only real answer is "trajectory differences." Only trajectory difference is the heavier bullet left the muzzle when the muzzle was flexed upward. The lighter bullet, the muzzle was not at apex of the sine wave. Heavier bullet left higher, so it hits higher. Barrel harmonics. I've shot countless 500 yard ladder tests .224" bullets, everything in between up to .338" bullets, short action to big magnums. Same components, only difference is powder charge. Many times, with high end custom rifles, I've seen sub 1/4 MOA groups with three different charges in the group. I've also seen hotter charges land lower than lighter charges. Why? The lighter charges were not in the accuracy node. And the accuracy node is a muzzle at apex of sine wave. Barrel harmonics.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: J.G.]
#8144038
01/26/21 04:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039
HicksHunter
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039 |
Here is a real world experience Hicks, proving its harmonics. My sons 6.5CM prints a 0 with 140gr AMAX. Put on the AAC can and note there is a POI shift 1" lower than w/o. MV stayed the same, same lot, same bullet, everything is 100% the same minus adding the can. THAT proves harmonics, without a doubt. And then as he changes his load, what happens to his POI? I'm sorry, but hanging a weight off the end of a barrel is not conclusive proof that ammunition changes harmonics enough to shift POI 2" or more at 100yd. The question is "why do heavier bullets hit higher at this distance," and the only real answer is "trajectory differences." Only trajectory difference is the heavier bullet left the muzzle when the muzzle was flexed upward. The lighter bullet, the muzzle was not at apex of the sine wave. Heavier bullet left higher, so it hits higher. Barrel harmonics. I've shot countless 500 yard ladder tests .224" bullets, everything in between up to .338" bullets, short action to big magnums. Same components, only difference is powder charge. Many times, with high end custom rifles, I've seen sub 1/4 MOA groups with three different charges in the group. I've also seen hotter charges land lower than lighter charges. Why? The lighter charges were not in the accuracy node. And the accuracy node is a muzzle at apex of sine wave. Barrel harmonics. As I posted earlier, I'd be interested to hear your guess as to what would happen here: "Help me understand this. You guys are saying that if you are testing a series of powder charges from low to high at 100 yards, instead of seeing a general trend of the bullets hitting lower and lower until you hit max charge, you will see oscillations up and down in POI of 2" and more? You aren't simply describing finding an accuracy node, you are implying that the barrel is whipping so severely and shifting your POI that no trend can be deduced!" Again, please keep in mind that we're talkng about short distances where the bullet is still on the rise, not a 500yd ladder test.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144043
01/26/21 04:09 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481 |
As I posted earlier, I'd be interested to hear your guess as to what would happen here:
"Help me understand this. You guys are saying that if you are testing a series of powder charges from low to high at 100 yards, instead of seeing a general trend of the bullets hitting lower and lower until you hit max charge, you will see oscillations up and down in POI of 2" and more? You aren't simply describing finding an accuracy node, you are implying that the barrel is whipping so severely and shifting your POI that no trend can be deduced!"
Again, please keep in mind that we're talkng about short distances where the bullet is still on the rise, not a 500yd ladder test.
So do you believe that all horizontal dispersion in grouping is caused by shooter inconsistency alone?
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144052
01/26/21 04:15 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,958
cxjcherokec
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,958 |
Here is a real world experience Hicks, proving its harmonics. My sons 6.5CM prints a 0 with 140gr AMAX. Put on the AAC can and note there is a POI shift 1" lower than w/o. MV stayed the same, same lot, same bullet, everything is 100% the same minus adding the can. THAT proves harmonics, without a doubt. And then as he changes his load, what happens to his POI? I'm sorry, but hanging a weight off the end of a barrel is not conclusive proof that ammunition changes harmonics enough to shift POI 2" or more at 100yd. The question is "why do heavier bullets hit higher at this distance," and the only real answer is "trajectory differences." My point was that barrel harmonics play a factor in POI shift. You claim its all based on MV and BC and harmonics play no role. I proved that wrong
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8144054
01/26/21 04:17 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,162
wp75169
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,162 |
Mine is not “on the rise” @ 100 yards. Some may be.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8144057
01/26/21 04:19 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039
HicksHunter
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039 |
I guess I'll have to bow out of the thread here. If you guys want to perpetuate fuddlore, go for it.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144068
01/26/21 04:25 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481
redchevy
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481 |
I guess I'll have to bow out of the thread here. If you guys want to perpetuate fuddlore, go for it. A lot is learned through disagreements. Keep it civil and its all ok. Dont ask one side to see it your way if your not willing to look at it from the other side as well.
It's hell eatin em live
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: redchevy]
#8144115
01/26/21 04:57 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,416
TLew
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 3,416 |
Dont ask one side to see it your way if your not willing to look at it from the other side as well. Repeat for bunker?
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144119
01/26/21 05:01 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085 |
Here is a real world experience Hicks, proving its harmonics. My sons 6.5CM prints a 0 with 140gr AMAX. Put on the AAC can and note there is a POI shift 1" lower than w/o. MV stayed the same, same lot, same bullet, everything is 100% the same minus adding the can. THAT proves harmonics, without a doubt. And then as he changes his load, what happens to his POI? I'm sorry, but hanging a weight off the end of a barrel is not conclusive proof that ammunition changes harmonics enough to shift POI 2" or more at 100yd. The question is "why do heavier bullets hit higher at this distance," and the only real answer is "trajectory differences." Only trajectory difference is the heavier bullet left the muzzle when the muzzle was flexed upward. The lighter bullet, the muzzle was not at apex of the sine wave. Heavier bullet left higher, so it hits higher. Barrel harmonics. I've shot countless 500 yard ladder tests .224" bullets, everything in between up to .338" bullets, short action to big magnums. Same components, only difference is powder charge. Many times, with high end custom rifles, I've seen sub 1/4 MOA groups with three different charges in the group. I've also seen hotter charges land lower than lighter charges. Why? The lighter charges were not in the accuracy node. And the accuracy node is a muzzle at apex of sine wave. Barrel harmonics. As I posted earlier, I'd be interested to hear your guess as to what would happen here: "Help me understand this. You guys are saying that if you are testing a series of powder charges from low to high at 100 yards, instead of seeing a general trend of the bullets hitting lower and lower until you hit max charge, you will see oscillations up and down in POI of 2" and more? You aren't simply describing finding an accuracy node, you are implying that the barrel is whipping so severely and shifting your POI that no trend can be deduced!" Again, please keep in mind that we're talkng about short distances where the bullet is still on the rise, not a 500yd ladder test. You can see POI shift of 2" and more at 100 yards, absolutely. I don't load test at 100 yards. But I will foul and check zero at 100 yards. And yes, sometimes you cannot see a trend on a BAD powder charge. It is what is called erratic. My charges are within .02 gr from one case to the next, so the ammo shot to shot is extremely consistent. But extremely consistent on an improper powder charge will still shoot poorly. Find the right charge and the load tightens up.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144122
01/26/21 05:02 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085 |
I guess I'll have to bow out of the thread here. If you guys want to perpetuate fuddlore, go for it. Fuddlore? Add all of us together and it is over 100,000 rounds of experience.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8144145
01/26/21 05:26 PM
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,157
Smokey Bear
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,157 |
Hicks, I’ve been following along here and you are off the mark. I respect the fact you have given a lot of thought to cause and effect however your logic is flawed. A 100 yard zero is load specific in a given rifle. Only after we have various Bullets leaving the muzzle in the same exact same direction can we compare trajectories. When the cartridge goes off, the barreled action writhes like a snake in all directions, not just up and down. Precise bedding, heavy barrels and pressure points are among the things used to dampen the shock wave that bounces up and down the barreled action until it dissipates after the cartridge is fired. We go to great lengths to shore up the bedding in order to find a powder charge where the shock wave has bounced back into the action and the muzzle is at its most stable when the bullet leaves the bore. The reality is until we shoot the various loads in a given rifle, the point of impact is a mystery due to barrel harmonics. Once we find a load that leaves the muzzle where it is in a stable position it is utterly repeatable.
Last edited by Smokey Bear; 01/26/21 05:44 PM.
Smokey Bear---Lone Star State.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: Smokey Bear]
#8144267
01/26/21 07:25 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,320
Crews
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,320 |
Hicks, I’ve been following along here and you are off the mark. Worth repeating.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: Crews]
#8144328
01/26/21 08:24 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,541
patriot07
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,541 |
Hicks, I’ve been following along here and you are off the mark. Worth repeating. +2
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8144332
01/26/21 08:26 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,215
Texas Dan
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,215 |
Yes, there is a bit of a "swamp" in this as well as the Ammo Forum.
"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8144383
01/26/21 09:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039
HicksHunter
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039 |
Again, I challenge anyone here to shoot their two best shooting loads of different grains and/or velocity at a distance closer than their zero (thanks for helping clarify this, WP), and post a picture of your results. 100% the slower bullet will impact higher, negating the idea that it's due to harmonics.
I'll even film a video next time I go to the range demonstrating this with several firearms. Handguns and rifles of both centerfire and rimfire varieties.
Last edited by HicksHunter; 01/26/21 09:11 PM.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144396
01/26/21 09:13 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085 |
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8144400
01/26/21 09:16 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039
HicksHunter
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039 |
I can relate.
For pete's sake, why is it such a common thing to suggest changing bullet weights in a pistol when it doesn't shoot to POI with fixed sights? It's definitely not barrel whip because 100% of the time it's suggested to go with a heavier, slower bullet.
Last edited by HicksHunter; 01/26/21 09:19 PM.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144413
01/26/21 09:29 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,766
P_102
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,766 |
Again, I challenge anyone here to shoot their two best shooting loads of different grains and/or velocity at a distance closer than their zero (thanks for helping clarify this, WP), and post a picture of your results. 100% the slower bullet will impact higher, negating the idea that it's due to harmonics.
I'll even film a video next time I go to the range demonstrating this with several firearms. Handguns and rifles of both centerfire and rimfire varieties. The two BEST SHOOTING loads are likely leaving the barrel at the top of the ‘wave’ which may make your statement correct...unfortunately that has ZERO to do with the question Mr. Fudd.
Do not trifle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: P_102]
#8144418
01/26/21 09:31 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039
HicksHunter
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,039 |
Again, I challenge anyone here to shoot their two best shooting loads of different grains and/or velocity at a distance closer than their zero (thanks for helping clarify this, WP), and post a picture of your results. 100% the slower bullet will impact higher, negating the idea that it's due to harmonics.
I'll even film a video next time I go to the range demonstrating this with several firearms. Handguns and rifles of both centerfire and rimfire varieties. The two BEST SHOOTING loads are likely leaving the barrel at the top of the ‘wave’ which may make your statement correct...unfortunately that has ZERO to do with the question Mr. Fudd. Ahh, so you're saying that the two best shooting loads would have an identical POI? Even with different velocities? Because this is demonstrably false.
Last edited by HicksHunter; 01/26/21 09:31 PM.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: onlysmith&wesson]
#8144423
01/26/21 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,766
P_102
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,766 |
Please point out where I said that.......or do you have a difficult time with English?
Do not trifle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
|
|
|
Re: POI of heavier vs. lighter bullets
[Re: HicksHunter]
#8144424
01/26/21 09:33 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,541
patriot07
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,541 |
Again, I challenge anyone here to shoot their two best shooting loads of different grains and/or velocity at a distance closer than their zero (thanks for helping clarify this, WP), and post a picture of your results. 100% the slower bullet will impact higher, negating the idea that it's due to harmonics.
I'll even film a video next time I go to the range demonstrating this with several firearms. Handguns and rifles of both centerfire and rimfire varieties. I'm not burning a $20 range fee and $20 in ammo to prove what we already know to someone who refuses to consider the fact that they might be wrong.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|