|
Forums46
Topics537,717
Posts9,728,135
Members87,037
| |
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
 So technically...
#8064274
11/25/20 06:02 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,244
DeRico
OP
Mobius 1
|
|
OP
Mobius 1
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,244 |
Since you’re paying the $200 tax stamp on a machine gun, you don’t have to pay another $200 for it being an “SBR” machine gun...
With that being said...
If one were to pay the $200 tax stamp on an AR15, it can be whatever size you register it as?
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: DeRico]
#8064298
11/25/20 06:30 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,894
unclebubba
THF Trophy Hunter
|
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 9,894 |
Since you’re paying the $200 tax stamp on a machine gun, you don’t have to pay another $200 for it being an “SBR” machine gun...
With that being said...
If one were to pay the $200 tax stamp on an AR15, it can be whatever size you register it as? I don't plan on finding out the answer to that question.
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: DeRico]
#8064410
11/25/20 08:10 PM
|
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,016
SingleShot85
Veteran Tracker
|
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,016 |
Since you’re paying the $200 tax stamp on a machine gun, you don’t have to pay another $200 for it being an “SBR” machine gun...
With that being said...
If one were to pay the $200 tax stamp on an AR15, it can be whatever size you register it as? to cover all your bases, you would register it w/ the shortest barrel possible, say a 7.5", as the paper work requires you to put the length on the form...... then the gun can be configured any length longer
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: DeRico]
#8065367
11/26/20 03:27 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 15,953
Jimbo1
THF Celebrity
|
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 15,953 |
President Trumps eventual victory will make this a moot point.
FJB - Lets Go Brandon
BBB - Bring Back Better
Awake - Not Woke!
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: DeRico]
#8071346
12/01/20 02:05 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,236
blkt2
Veteran Tracker
|
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,236 |
Under the law machine guns, sbr's, and sbs's are not considered firearms. They are legally NFA weapons. An sbr is simply a type of NFA weapon and by registering something as an SBR you are putting it into the NFA weapon category and removing it from the firearm category. Machine guns are already NFA weapons and can have any barrel length that you feel like putting on them.
Trolling? Heck no, I meant every word of it.
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: DeRico]
#8071384
12/01/20 02:26 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 323
diablodog
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 323 |
It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate .
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: diablodog]
#8071719
12/01/20 06:08 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,236
blkt2
Veteran Tracker
|
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,236 |
It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate . If that's true they sure are taking their sweet time about going around and doing it. The purpose of the NFA was to use congress's taxation Authority to prevent people from buying NFA weapons in the first place by making them very expensive. That $200 transfer tax is about $5,800 in today's dollars. The really funny thing is that you can find the transcripts of the Congressional testimony when they were passing the National Firearms Act and if you read what was said it is pretty eye-opening. It exposes the lefts revisionist history lie that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with individual rights and instead conveys power to the government by giving the government the right to keep and bear arms.
Trolling? Heck no, I meant every word of it.
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: DeRico]
#8072450
12/02/20 02:37 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 482
Uncle Zeek
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 482 |
Since you’re paying the $200 tax stamp on a machine gun, you don’t have to pay another $200 for it being an “SBR” machine gun...
With that being said...
If one were to pay the $200 tax stamp on an AR15, it can be whatever size you register it as? Hypothetically, if Biden's threat were to come true, and all AR type rifles were recategorized as NFA firearms, then ... you know what? I need to pour myself a scotch. The thought of his figurehead Presidency (which will end as soon as Harris decides to get rid of him) nauseates me. I don't know the answer, because it would depend on what the new hypothetical ATF rules would be from the hypocrite-in-chief.
"Decency is not news; it is buried in the obituaries - but it is a force stronger than crime" ~ Robert A. Heinlein
Artim Law Firm, PLLC
Estate, probate & taxes
2250 Morriss Road, Suite 205, Flower Mound, Texas 75028
972-746-0758 work
zac@artimlegal.com
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: blkt2]
#8072540
12/02/20 04:21 AM
|
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 323
diablodog
Bird Dog
|
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 323 |
It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate . If that's true they sure are taking their sweet time about going around and doing it. The purpose of the NFA was to use congress's taxation Authority to prevent people from buying NFA weapons in the first place by making them very expensive. That $200 transfer tax is about $5,800 in today's dollars. The really funny thing is that you can find the transcripts of the Congressional testimony when they were passing the National Firearms Act and if you read what was said it is pretty eye-opening. It exposes the lefts revisionist history lie that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with individual rights and instead conveys power to the government by giving the government the right to keep and bear arms. I was not talking about the old NFA , just about what they are going to use it for now . A $200.00 tax will mean little on a AR-15 .
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: diablodog]
#8073959
12/03/20 04:36 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,516
Earl
Extreme Tracker
|
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,516 |
Yeah well if you read that asinine idiots wish list platform he wants to tax EACH magazine over 10 rounds as an NFA item ($200 ea) also...I don't know about you but that's over $100k in Taxes for me - JUST FOR MAGAZINES (before the boating accident, all them magazines sank the damn boat)...F that... It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate . If that's true they sure are taking their sweet time about going around and doing it. The purpose of the NFA was to use congress's taxation Authority to prevent people from buying NFA weapons in the first place by making them very expensive. That $200 transfer tax is about $5,800 in today's dollars. The really funny thing is that you can find the transcripts of the Congressional testimony when they were passing the National Firearms Act and if you read what was said it is pretty eye-opening. It exposes the lefts revisionist history lie that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with individual rights and instead conveys power to the government by giving the government the right to keep and bear arms. I was not talking about the old NFA , just about what they are going to use it for now . A $200.00 tax will mean little on a AR-15 .
Last edited by Earl; 12/03/20 04:37 AM.
![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/BQY4Hjvq/10pt3-1.jpg) ![[Linked Image]](https://i.postimg.cc/155y8GsC/big10down2.jpg)
|
|
|
|
Re: So technically...
[Re: Earl]
#8074489
12/03/20 05:33 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 927
GNTX
Tracker
|
|
Tracker
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 927 |
Yeah well if you read that asinine idiots wish list platform he wants to tax EACH magazine over 10 rounds as an NFA item ($200 ea) also...I don't know about you but that's over $100k in Taxes for me - JUST FOR MAGAZINES (before the boating accident, all them magazines sank the damn boat)...F that... It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate . If that's true they sure are taking their sweet time about going around and doing it. The purpose of the NFA was to use congress's taxation Authority to prevent people from buying NFA weapons in the first place by making them very expensive. That $200 transfer tax is about $5,800 in today's dollars. The really funny thing is that you can find the transcripts of the Congressional testimony when they were passing the National Firearms Act and if you read what was said it is pretty eye-opening. It exposes the lefts revisionist history lie that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with individual rights and instead conveys power to the government by giving the government the right to keep and bear arms. I was not talking about the old NFA , just about what they are going to use it for now . A $200.00 tax will mean little on a AR-15 . We all need to coordinate which lake we are going to have our accident on so it doesn’t get too crowded.  Seriously though, let us hope that Georgia goes the right direction and we keep the Senate with a Republican majority to stymie most of that idiot’s gun control ideas.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|
![[Linked Image]](https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/pics/userpics/2020/05/full-34454-228887-trigger_personal_emblem.png)
