texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Cypress_Rick, TopOfTexas, MarshallA, Field & Cave, Robert Stevens
67872 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 104,810
bill oxner 76,931
stxranchman 57,148
SnakeWrangler 55,033
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Gravytrain 41,480
BMD 41,112
Forum Statistics
Forums45
Topics593,789
Posts11,167,106
Members82,872
Most Online19,184
Feb 5th, 2020
Print Thread
So technically... #8064274 11/25/20 06:02 PM
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,485
D
DeRico Online Sick OP
Pro Tracker
OP Online Sick
Pro Tracker
D
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,485
Since you’re paying the $200 tax stamp on a machine gun, you don’t have to pay another $200 for it being an “SBR” machine gun...

With that being said...

If one were to pay the $200 tax stamp on an AR15, it can be whatever size you register it as?


[Linked Image]
Re: So technically... [Re: DeRico] #8064298 11/25/20 06:30 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,914
U
unclebubba Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
U
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,914
Originally Posted by DeRico
Since you’re paying the $200 tax stamp on a machine gun, you don’t have to pay another $200 for it being an “SBR” machine gun...

With that being said...

If one were to pay the $200 tax stamp on an AR15, it can be whatever size you register it as?

I don't plan on finding out the answer to that question.

Re: So technically... [Re: DeRico] #8064410 11/25/20 08:10 PM
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,984
S
SingleShot85 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,984
Originally Posted by DeRico
Since you’re paying the $200 tax stamp on a machine gun, you don’t have to pay another $200 for it being an “SBR” machine gun...

With that being said...

If one were to pay the $200 tax stamp on an AR15, it can be whatever size you register it as?



to cover all your bases, you would register it w/ the shortest barrel possible, say a 7.5", as the paper work requires you to put the length on the form...... then the gun can be configured any length longer

Re: So technically... [Re: DeRico] #8065367 11/26/20 03:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,157
J
Jimbo1 Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
J
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 6,157
President Trumps eventual victory will make this a moot point.

Re: So technically... [Re: DeRico] #8071346 12/01/20 02:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 603
B
blkt2 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 603
Under the law machine guns, sbr's, and sbs's are not considered firearms. They are legally NFA weapons. An sbr is simply a type of NFA weapon and by registering something as an SBR you are putting it into the NFA weapon category and removing it from the firearm category. Machine guns are already NFA weapons and can have any barrel length that you feel like putting on them.

Re: So technically... [Re: DeRico] #8071384 12/01/20 02:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 139
D
diablodog Online Content
Woodsman
Online Content
Woodsman
D
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 139
It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate .

Re: So technically... [Re: diablodog] #8071719 12/01/20 06:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 603
B
blkt2 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 603
Originally Posted by diablodog
It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate .


If that's true they sure are taking their sweet time about going around and doing it. The purpose of the NFA was to use congress's taxation Authority to prevent people from buying NFA weapons in the first place by making them very expensive. That $200 transfer tax is about $5,800 in today's dollars. The really funny thing is that you can find the transcripts of the Congressional testimony when they were passing the National Firearms Act and if you read what was said it is pretty eye-opening. It exposes the lefts revisionist history lie that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with individual rights and instead conveys power to the government by giving the government the right to keep and bear arms.

Re: So technically... [Re: DeRico] #8072450 12/02/20 02:37 AM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 49
U
Uncle Zeek Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
U
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 49
Originally Posted by DeRico
Since you’re paying the $200 tax stamp on a machine gun, you don’t have to pay another $200 for it being an “SBR” machine gun...

With that being said...

If one were to pay the $200 tax stamp on an AR15, it can be whatever size you register it as?


Hypothetically, if Biden's threat were to come true, and all AR type rifles were recategorized as NFA firearms, then ... you know what? I need to pour myself a scotch. The thought of his figurehead Presidency (which will end as soon as Harris decides to get rid of him) nauseates me.

I don't know the answer, because it would depend on what the new hypothetical ATF rules would be from the hypocrite-in-chief.

Re: So technically... [Re: blkt2] #8072540 12/02/20 04:21 AM
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 139
D
diablodog Online Content
Woodsman
Online Content
Woodsman
D
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 139
Originally Posted by blkt2
Originally Posted by diablodog
It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate .


If that's true they sure are taking their sweet time about going around and doing it. The purpose of the NFA was to use congress's taxation Authority to prevent people from buying NFA weapons in the first place by making them very expensive. That $200 transfer tax is about $5,800 in today's dollars. The really funny thing is that you can find the transcripts of the Congressional testimony when they were passing the National Firearms Act and if you read what was said it is pretty eye-opening. It exposes the lefts revisionist history lie that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with individual rights and instead conveys power to the government by giving the government the right to keep and bear arms.


I was not talking about the old NFA , just about what they are going to use it for now . A $200.00 tax will mean little on a AR-15 .

Re: So technically... [Re: diablodog] #8073959 12/03/20 04:36 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,004
E
Earl Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
E
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 4,004
Yeah well if you read that asinine idiots wish list platform he wants to tax EACH magazine over 10 rounds as an NFA item ($200 ea) also...I don't know about you but that's over $100k in Taxes for me - JUST FOR MAGAZINES (before the boating accident, all them magazines sank the damn boat)...F that...

Originally Posted by diablodog
Originally Posted by blkt2
Originally Posted by diablodog
It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate .


If that's true they sure are taking their sweet time about going around and doing it. The purpose of the NFA was to use congress's taxation Authority to prevent people from buying NFA weapons in the first place by making them very expensive. That $200 transfer tax is about $5,800 in today's dollars. The really funny thing is that you can find the transcripts of the Congressional testimony when they were passing the National Firearms Act and if you read what was said it is pretty eye-opening. It exposes the lefts revisionist history lie that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with individual rights and instead conveys power to the government by giving the government the right to keep and bear arms.


I was not talking about the old NFA , just about what they are going to use it for now . A $200.00 tax will mean little on a AR-15 .


Last edited by Earl; 12/03/20 04:37 AM.

Re: So technically... [Re: Earl] #8074489 12/03/20 05:33 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 215
G
GNTX Online Content
Woodsman
Online Content
Woodsman
G
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 215
Originally Posted by Earl
Yeah well if you read that asinine idiots wish list platform he wants to tax EACH magazine over 10 rounds as an NFA item ($200 ea) also...I don't know about you but that's over $100k in Taxes for me - JUST FOR MAGAZINES (before the boating accident, all them magazines sank the damn boat)...F that...

Originally Posted by diablodog
Originally Posted by blkt2
Originally Posted by diablodog
It does not really matter as the only purpose of the registration is to have a list of guns to confiscate .


If that's true they sure are taking their sweet time about going around and doing it. The purpose of the NFA was to use congress's taxation Authority to prevent people from buying NFA weapons in the first place by making them very expensive. That $200 transfer tax is about $5,800 in today's dollars. The really funny thing is that you can find the transcripts of the Congressional testimony when they were passing the National Firearms Act and if you read what was said it is pretty eye-opening. It exposes the lefts revisionist history lie that the Second Amendment has nothing to do with individual rights and instead conveys power to the government by giving the government the right to keep and bear arms.


I was not talking about the old NFA , just about what they are going to use it for now . A $200.00 tax will mean little on a AR-15 .



We all need to coordinate which lake we are going to have our accident on so it doesn’t get too crowded. grin

Seriously though, let us hope that Georgia goes the right direction and we keep the Senate with a Republican majority to stymie most of that idiot’s gun control ideas.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2019 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3