I have lucky underwear to that works to an extent as well and am willing to sell them for less than Ozonics.
People swear by HECS suits to stop animals from sensing your electromagnetic fields.
People swear by scent control clothing as if it could magically stop you from exhaling scent or dropping thousands of skin cells per hour.
People swear by certain types of camo.
People swear by solunar tables as if the animals are somehow tied to the position of the moon, not just the fish for which the tables were developed, but ALL animals.
Here is a test that is sometimes cited as proof. Notice how much is going into this. Notice that the target is in an enclosed environment that has been saturated by ozone in preparation before entry and sat inside the box with the ozone generator running. This is NOT how ozone is used in the field and is potentially hazardous to the user. Never mind all the other stuff that was being done as well.https://www.fieldandstream.com/does-scent-control-work/
What is interesting to note is that when people are successful when using a product such a a HECS suit, new camo, scent locker, scent cover, etc., they attribute the success to the product they are using. If they don't have luck despite using said product, there are claims such as "Well, the deer/hogs just weren't moving." "I must have been making too much noise." "Other hunters scared away the game." In other words, there is no way for the product to fail as failure is always attributed to other factors, success only being attributed to the new product. In other words, it becomes non-falsifiable.
Often times, people will modify their own behavior, albeit unconsciously, to make the product work better. There are people who actually got better gas mileage using magnets on their fuel line, using the vornado, etc. Some people really do get better gas mileage when they use them because they start driving better. The products themselves don't actually work. Pretty soon, they are back to their crappy gas mileage despite using the product and that is because their behavior changed.https://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0057-gas-saving-products
Then there is the factor of buyer embarrassment. Nobody wants to admit to spending big bucks on a piece of garbage.
Looking at some reviews, it is interesting to see where you can get better results with a $11 spray (4.5 stars) than with $530 Ozonics generator (3.5 stars).https://smile.amazon.com/Scent-Kill...KBGHJ0YFB2F&psc=1&qid=1584229477https://smile.amazon.com/Ozonics-HR...ds=ozonics&qid=1584229265&sr=8-7
It is your money. If you want to experiment and spend/waste your money on the hunting equivalent of get-rich-quick-schemes, go right ahead.