texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
cpen13, Huntinkid, garey, SteveG, justin77
72053 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,796
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,526
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,920
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,986
Posts9,731,413
Members87,053
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7943934 08/20/20 08:06 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,642
Q
QuitShootinYoungBucks Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Q
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,642
I really like my 6.8 but I could see moving on from it, particularly if the 6mm ARC does what they say it will. We don't have enough hogs to justify needing a few more rounds in the mag versus the extra ft-lbs the ARC may carry and the downrange ballistic capability.


[Linked Image]

https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7944035 08/20/20 09:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 124
R
Retired and hunting Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
R
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 124
The new Kevlar armored deer and hogs justify owning the latest and greatest modern rifle,the ancient 243 is barely minimal and a 30-30 will bounce right off.


Don't know where I'm goin but I'm makin good time
Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7944175 08/20/20 10:54 PM
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 420
R
Roughneck913 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
R
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by RJH1
Originally Posted by garyrapp55
Originally Posted by Roughneck913
it needs only to be better for the users intended purpose.

True statement. A 3030 might be better because it can be had used for dirt cheap to the kid with only $200 in his pocket.



Which makes it not really better, just different. I'll bet the guy you originally quoted would say that basically everything is better than a 30-30. I disagree I think a 30-30 is a fine round there are other cartridges that are different but I don't think they're better. Which was my point all along.


"Is a fine round" is a REALLY low bar. That like saying its "good enough." Lots of things are "good enough." Lots of things are better than those things. Remington 783 is a "good enough" rifle for shooting deer at 100yds. There are also BETTER options for most people. If 30-30 works for you, fine. There are other options that are inarguably BETTER in any given performance metric you pick. That is the objective definition of "better." again, doesnt mean you NEED it, but something being better isn't based on your subjective desire to own it

Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7944214 08/20/20 11:30 PM
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,198
S
Smokey Bear Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 5,198
.243 heads my list and I have no problem with those that love it. Too much punch for preserving fur on varmints. Works for deer but is on the light side of my preference. Great deer rifle for women and kids that can’t handle more recoil. I’m not a woman or a kid and struggle to put it in a category that It would be among my preferred choices to shoot.


Smokey Bear---Lone Star State.
Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: Roughneck913] #7944320 08/21/20 01:13 AM
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,350
R
RJH1 Online Content OP
Pro Tracker
OP Online Content
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,350
Originally Posted by Roughneck913
[quote=RJH1][quote=garyrapp55][quote=Roughneck913]

"Is a fine round" is a REALLY low bar. That like saying its "good enough." Lots of things are "good enough." Lots of things are better than those things. Remington 783 is a "good enough" rifle for shooting deer at 100yds. There are also BETTER options for most people. If 30-30 works for you, fine. There are other options that are inarguably BETTER in any given performance metric you pick. That is the objective definition of "better." again, doesnt mean you NEED it, but something being better isn't based on your subjective desire to own it



If final performance is the only metric you are concerned with then 30-378 is the round for you because it is "better" than any other round. But that is still a VERY subjective metric and really outside the scope of this thread, so i am done messing with it here.

Have a good one

Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7944340 08/21/20 01:29 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,508
syncerus Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,508
I used to get excited about exotic calibers, particularly if they were Euro. As time goes by, I'm more interested in actual hunting and shooting than messing with gear, and I've come to the conclusion that actual performance is virtually identical between cartridges within a given category. I've sold a number of the odd ball chamberings, and I'm sure most of the others will follow over the next few years.


NRA Patriot Benefactor & DSC Lifer
Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7944343 08/21/20 01:32 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
G
GusWayne Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,658
I just got my first 22-250, looking for another

Hate to hear bad about it

I’ll have 2 before long.

Back to topic, .270

Give me a .308 anyday

Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7944504 08/21/20 03:15 AM
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 124
R
Retired and hunting Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
R
Joined: Aug 2020
Posts: 124
Bought my wife a "better" gun ,a beautiful old model Remington 700 with a compact stock and 26 in barrel,first one I ever seen,in the 25-06. Thought I was doing good.so when deer season rolled around last year she cased her tried and true Ruger 22-250 which she is I think 13 out of 14 with.the one doe that got away was my fault .i meant she put it in the case loaded it in the truck and took it hunting

Last edited by Retired and hunting; 08/21/20 03:18 AM.

Don't know where I'm goin but I'm makin good time
Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7945950 08/22/20 02:53 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,607
R
Revoman Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,607
17 Rem
204 Ruger
22-250
25-06
300 Weatherby



Call'm an Kill'm
Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7945955 08/22/20 02:59 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,816
T
TDK Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,816
All calibers still do it, even 6.5 creedless.


A.M. Little Bespoke Gunmakers LLC
Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7945993 08/22/20 03:31 PM
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 85
C
chicken fried Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
C
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 85
243 Winchester every time I shoot a deer I regret it. They always run (shoulder shot) and leave very little trail. There are better choices for light recoil rifles.

Re: Cartridges that no longer "do it" for you [Re: RJH1] #7949194 08/25/20 10:32 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
R
RickC Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
7 Mag. I owned one and will never own another.


NRA Life Member
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3