texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
garey, SteveG, justin77, Tjh, Clint Mcmullen
72051 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,525
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,914
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,970
Posts9,731,198
Members87,051
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849073 05/24/20 01:10 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
Looks like you shoot at B-Tactical as well. Thats where I was today. I bet I have met you.


[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849075 05/24/20 01:10 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,220
W
wp75169 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,220
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
You probably meant 47 rounds now that I look at it.

It was more like 60. I zeroed the scope with 3 and then shot 10 more foulers since I stripped the barrel clean to foul it a bit before I shot for groups.



Sorry, it was an attempt at being funny. I think theyre heavy. The 47 pounds was an exaggeration. As far as unknown loads I simply meant you’ve yet to do load development yourself, and factory ammo is seldom the best. I bet when you tune handloads it will tighten up.

Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849079 05/24/20 01:14 AM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,879
J
jlsbassman Online Content
Pro Tracker
Online Content
Pro Tracker
J
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,879
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
Looks like you shoot at B-Tactical as well. Thats where I was today. I bet I have met you.


That’s where I mostly shoot thru the week. To busy anymore on the weekends. That pic was probably 4-5 yrs ago. I’ve had 3 other RPR since then, all shot well. I have a Gen 1 6.5CM that’s unfired, getting ready to work up a load for it.

Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: jlsbassman] #7849089 05/24/20 01:21 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
Still bet we have met. I have been shooting there since they opened and go every weekend, sometimes twice a week.


[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849100 05/24/20 01:32 AM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,879
J
jlsbassman Online Content
Pro Tracker
Online Content
Pro Tracker
J
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,879
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
Still bet we have met. I have been shooting there since they opened and go every weekend, sometimes twice a week.


Give me a shout if you want to try some 105 AMAX. That’s what I shoot in my 243. I have about 1700 of them so I’m good for a while. They shoot great.

Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849102 05/24/20 01:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,171
J.G. Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,171
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
Originally Posted by FiremanJG
If you've got the time and the distance to ladder test it, I bet you'll find your load(s).

I've only got experience with 6.5 Creedmoor in the R.P.R. and they were 1/2-3/4 MOA shooters. In other words, right now my opinion of the R.P.R. is pretty high. And yes, Kyle did have a bad barrel, it shot quite bad. And a .308 shooting bad in this day and age is not something that's very common.


Are there any magical 6mm bullets these days? The last time I loaded for .243 the 105 Amax was top dog. The 103s and 108s might be it now days I guess.


I tend to gravitate toward Hornady first.

But, if I were to build a 6 Creedmoor it would have the twist to rin 115 DTACs, or I wouldn't build it. Not sure if the Ruger has the twist for that though. So back to the Hornady list. Course Berger is an option, and Sierras are always easy to make shoot.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: J.G.] #7849114 05/24/20 01:48 AM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,879
J
jlsbassman Online Content
Pro Tracker
Online Content
Pro Tracker
J
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,879
Originally Posted by FiremanJG
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
Originally Posted by FiremanJG
If you've got the time and the distance to ladder test it, I bet you'll find your load(s).

I've only got experience with 6.5 Creedmoor in the R.P.R. and they were 1/2-3/4 MOA shooters. In other words, right now my opinion of the R.P.R. is pretty high. And yes, Kyle did have a bad barrel, it shot quite bad. And a .308 shooting bad in this day and age is not something that's very common.


Are there any magical 6mm bullets these days? The last time I loaded for .243 the 105 Amax was top dog. The 103s and 108s might be it now days I guess.


I tend to gravitate toward Hornady first.

But, if I were to build a 6 Creedmoor it would have the twist to rin 115 DTACs, or I wouldn't build it. Not sure if the Ruger has the twist for that though. So back to the Hornady list. Course Berger is an option, and Sierras are always easy to make shoot.

They have a 7.7 twist. I would think 115 would work. I know those 105 AMAX worked great in the 243 with the 7.7 twist.

Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849116 05/24/20 01:48 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
Its a 1-7.7 twist. At least they got that right.


[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849120 05/24/20 01:49 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
Funny thing is, the 105s worked great in my Remington varmint 243 which had a 1-12 twist.

Eta: all the way to 1100 yards at Battlefield.

Last edited by CharlieSierraDelta; 05/24/20 01:50 AM.

[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849123 05/24/20 01:50 AM
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,879
J
jlsbassman Online Content
Pro Tracker
Online Content
Pro Tracker
J
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,879
I found the Berger required a lot more work to get them to shoot as well in it. I worked for a while to get the 105 Hybrids to shoot as well.

Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849125 05/24/20 01:51 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
Ill have to check on Sierras. They are always easy to get shooting good although they dont have the BC.


[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849132 05/24/20 01:57 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
Looks like Sierras 110 Matchking has a BC of .617 vs the Hornady 108 ELD-M at .536. The 110 ATip has a .604. Hmm. Might have to give the Sierras a shot.


[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849137 05/24/20 01:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,171
J.G. Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,171
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
Ill have to check on Sierras. They are always easy to get shooting good although they dont have the BC.


I agree. However, in the last few years they have stepped up their BC a bit. Hornady and Berger were out performing them. Right now, on these 6's, I don't know, haven't looked into them. Not hard to make you a list. Course, Hornady's are easy to make shoot as well. I see Berger VLD, and expect to have to mess with seating depth. Not so much with Hornady and Sierra. Jump em 5 or 50, or 100, and you'll still find a good load.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849149 05/24/20 02:06 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
P
patriot07 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
P
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
Needs a true load development. Two factory loads and one pre-made handload are hardly a test of a gun's capabilities. No guarantees it will shoot lights out, but it would be an unusual RPR if it didn't.

Jlbassman can make those things sing. I'd sell it to him and let him see what he could do with it. It'll save you $ in the long run.

Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849169 05/24/20 02:44 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,955
B
Buzzsaw Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,955
sell it

Last edited by Buzzsaw; 05/24/20 02:45 AM.

SPACE FOR RENT


Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: patriot07] #7849201 05/24/20 03:19 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
Originally Posted by patriot07
Needs a true load development. Two factory loads and one pre-made handload are hardly a test of a gun's capabilities. No guarantees it will shoot lights out, but it would be an unusual RPR if it didn't.

Jlbassman can make those things sing. I'd sell it to him and let him see what he could do with it. It'll save you $ in the long run.


Thanks for the opinion. I am well versed in handloading and load dev. I was just comparing it to a TIKKA T3 LITE with a 2nd hand barrel that I screwed on in my garage and proceeded to shoot half MOA with factory ammunuition. Like more than 2 different factory loads. I have developed a load for it, and will for this. It just doesnt seem inherently as accurate as what I am used to.


[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849225 05/24/20 03:54 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
P
patriot07 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
P
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,564
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
Originally Posted by patriot07
Needs a true load development. Two factory loads and one pre-made handload are hardly a test of a gun's capabilities. No guarantees it will shoot lights out, but it would be an unusual RPR if it didn't.

Jlbassman can make those things sing. I'd sell it to him and let him see what he could do with it. It'll save you $ in the long run.


Thanks for the opinion. I am well versed in handloading and load dev. I was just comparing it to a TIKKA T3 LITE with a 2nd hand barrel that I screwed on in my garage and proceeded to shoot half MOA with factory ammunuition. Like more than 2 different factory loads. I have developed a load for it, and will for this. It just doesnt seem inherently as accurate as what I am used to.

Some guns shoot some factory loads better than others. My Tikka CTR 6.5 CM shoots 140 ELD-M factory ammo nearly into one hole. It's 1/2 MOA with it, and I assume part of that is shooter-related. Then it's 2" groups with 143 ELD-X.

Guns are like women - they're all different. At least with a gun though, most of the time if something isn't happy, it really is because of something you did.

Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: dee] #7849320 05/24/20 12:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 7,759
S
snake oil Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 7,759
Originally Posted by dee
How many rounds were on it when you got it?


Less than fifty IIRC.


"You may all go to hell and I will go to Texas".
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849343 05/24/20 01:03 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257
[Re: CharlieSierraDelta]

Given you picked it up on a trade, here's someone who appears to pay special attention to barrel life, as well as twist rate when comparing the 6 and 6.5.

"6mm calibers, including the 6mm Creedmoor tend to have shorter barrel life than other calibers."

Link

Last edited by Texas Dan; 05/24/20 01:06 PM.

"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849347 05/24/20 01:10 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,774
P_102 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,774
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
Originally Posted by FiremanJG
If you've got the time and the distance to ladder test it, I bet you'll find your load(s).

I've only got experience with 6.5 Creedmoor in the R.P.R. and they were 1/2-3/4 MOA shooters. In other words, right now my opinion of the R.P.R. is pretty high. And yes, Kyle did have a bad barrel, it shot quite bad. And a .308 shooting bad in this day and age is not something that's very common.


Are there any magical 6mm bullets these days? The last time I loaded for .243 the 105 Amax was top dog. The 103s and 108s might be it now days I guess.


Clint, like FJG mentioned, the 115 DTAC is a current ‘magical’ bullet....If memory serves it holds the current 1000 yard record, 1.09” out of a 6 BR AI. Thinking of changing my .243 over!


Do not trifle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7849369 05/24/20 01:41 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
Originally Posted by CharlieSierraDelta
Originally Posted by FiremanJG
If you've got the time and the distance to ladder test it, I bet you'll find your load(s).

I've only got experience with 6.5 Creedmoor in the R.P.R. and they were 1/2-3/4 MOA shooters. In other words, right now my opinion of the R.P.R. is pretty high. And yes, Kyle did have a bad barrel, it shot quite bad. And a .308 shooting bad in this day and age is not something that's very common.


Are there any magical 6mm bullets these days? The last time I loaded for .243 the 105 Amax was top dog. The 103s and 108s might be it now days I guess.


105 hybrids or 107gr sierra are pretty much a shoe in for easy accuracy. My preference for bullets in the 6 creed is 115 dtacs.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7855211 05/30/20 12:56 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
Well. Im giving it the old college try. Tomorrow i will find out if this thing can shoot. [Linked Image]


[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7855335 05/30/20 03:22 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
110 smk have a horrible reputation for being finicky. The are extremely jump sensitive.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7855340 05/30/20 03:30 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
I guess we will find out tomorrow.


[Linked Image]
Re: Ruger RPR "I am not impressed with your performance" [Re: CharlieSierraDelta] #7855866 05/30/20 08:36 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
CharlieSierraDelta Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 560
No good today either, especially with my handloads with the 110 SMK.

I loaded a ladder test with the new Staball powder. The velocities are there for sure, but I dont think I have enough twist to stabilize them.

Last night I swapped scope rings and leveled my optic. I swapped bipods to my Harris BR.

41.0 = 2835 Avg
41.5 = 2930 Avg
42.0 = 2984 Avg
42.5 = 3028 Avg
42.7 = 3043 Avg. This load was published max, but I saw no pressure signs at all.

Anyways, the first group was a fluke. I attempted to back it up later and the group easily doubled in size. I shot these with bipod and off a bag. Nothing really changed. At this rate I am going to shoot the barrel out before I get a load developed.

[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]


[Linked Image]
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3