texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
J T, Thomas-J., ProfessorSnake, tshort21, texasgunny78
66094 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 95,451
bill oxner 60,129
stxranchman 55,408
SnakeWrangler 48,687
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,446
BMD 41,029
Big Orn 37,484
Facebook
Forum Statistics
Forums45
Topics442,647
Posts6,422,000
Members66,094
Most Online16,728
Mar 25th, 2012
Print Thread
NIKON SCOPES #7709147 01/06/20 12:26 PM
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,791
D
DLALLDER Online Content OP
Extreme Tracker
OP Online Content
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 3,791
I have heard rumors that Nikon has ceased making rifle scopes. Any truth? Thanks Daniel







Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7709149 01/06/20 12:30 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,755
P
procraft05 Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
P
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 6,755
I heard that too, may have heard it here can’t remember


The Astro’s are cheating scum bags!
Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7709160 01/06/20 12:48 PM
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 129
J
jay baker Online Content
Woodsman
Online Content
Woodsman
J
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 129
From what I understand, they are only dropping their rifle scope lines. I wonder how their warranty is going to work if you have a problem. I own only one and it’s been pretty good on my 45/70.

Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7709171 01/06/20 01:08 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,781
W
wp75169 Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,781
I believe they are history. Many like europtics are running them about 40-50% off right now.

Last edited by wp75169; 01/06/20 01:09 PM.
Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7709191 01/06/20 01:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 30,519
F
FiremanJG Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
F
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 30,519
There's a thread about it in the optics section. They are out of the rifle scope business.

It's a shame, too they historically had pretty dang good glass. But, they failed (like so many optics companies) to hire some shooters to educate them on rifle scopes they should build.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7710140 01/07/20 03:01 AM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,892
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,892
I've always considered Nikon to be the Toyota of rifle scopes. You can pay a lot more but the overall value per dollar is hard to beat.


Dan,

Spring, Texas
Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: Texas Dan] #7710145 01/07/20 03:12 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,781
W
wp75169 Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 6,781
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
I've always considered Nikon to be the Toyota of rifle scopes. You can pay a lot more but the overall value per dollar is hard to beat.



That was absolutely the case when the had the Prostaff, Buckmaster, and Monarch. Then they started changing crap around to where nobody could follow along. They switched the lineup in quality with the Buckmaster and Prostaff, them gave the Prostaff 3 different designations.

I had suggested the original Prostaff to many people with a tight budget as a sure nuff get it done reliably with decent glass scope. Now I don’t even know if they have that offering.

I’m glad the FFII fills that spot now when someone ask what they can do with $200 or less.

Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: wp75169] #7710417 01/07/20 02:41 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,892
T
Texas Dan Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,892
Originally Posted by wp75169
Originally Posted by Texas Dan
I've always considered Nikon to be the Toyota of rifle scopes. You can pay a lot more but the overall value per dollar is hard to beat.



That was absolutely the case when the had the Prostaff, Buckmaster, and Monarch. Then they started changing crap around to where nobody could follow along. They switched the lineup in quality with the Buckmaster and Prostaff, them gave the Prostaff 3 different designations.

I had suggested the original Prostaff to many people with a tight budget as a sure nuff get it done reliably with decent glass scope. Now I don’t even know if they have that offering.

I’m glad the FFII fills that spot now when someone ask what they can do with $200 or less.


Several if not all the scope manufacturers appear to have followed the same course. They've taken the same glass and built something cheaper around it to create a less expensive product, much like Remington did with their rifle barrels.


Dan,

Spring, Texas
Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: FiremanJG] #7710570 01/07/20 04:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,695
G
garyrapp55 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
G
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,695
Originally Posted by FiremanJG
It's a shame, too they historically had pretty dang good glass.

Agreed. I've only ever bought 2 but for what I paid both were great. Still have the 4x fixed on my 10/22 and it works fine. Killed many turtles and cans with it. There seems to be a spike in long range shooting now. I don't know if Nikon was asleep or thought it not to be profitable or what but they were left in the dust in that market. That FX1000 or whatever it is came too little too late. Had they offered a good option for LR, I would have gone Nikon regardless of what the talking heads here had to say. Nikon, decent glass, fair price, no ability to keep up with changing markets.

Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: garyrapp55] #7710577 01/07/20 04:47 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 30,850
B
Brother in-law Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 30,850
No they tried to slide the fx1000 in on a somewhat already educated market. They mushy turrets and cheap plastic was going to cut it at their asking price

Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7710588 01/07/20 05:01 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 32,447
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 32,447
Must be a lot of variation on the lower price scopes. The turrets on my brothers FX-1000 feel identicle to my SS5-20 and the turrets on my vortex gen 1 viper are more positive than either of those. There isn't any plastic I know of on my brothers it has been great and the glass is as good or better than the SS5-20 hd.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7710609 01/07/20 05:13 PM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,114
J
Jgraider Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
J
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 2,114
Given the fact that the parent company Nikon Camera is very anti-gun and anti-hunting, I've never owned a Nikon anything, and have no desire to do so now. Nikon as as a whole is losing money in every sector except their semi-conductor business, or so I've read.

Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7710616 01/07/20 05:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 32,447
R
redchevy Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 32,447
I have no info to the contrary I just don't see why an anti gun company would make scopes?


It's hell eatin em live
Re: NIKON SCOPES [Re: DLALLDER] #7710666 01/07/20 05:58 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 53
G
GNTX Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
G
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 53
I have the first gen Buckmaster 3-9x40 on my lever gun and it has been very reliable. I use the Spot On app to show my hold over yardage with the BDC reticle and there are dead hogs and coyotes that have found out just how accurate those numbers can be.

I think, like many companies, Nikon is feeling the pinch of some decent quality offerings out of China that appeal to the most bang for buck crowd.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2019 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3