texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
4Notch, Niknoc76, breederbuck33, Breakin25, Jee
72039 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,514
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,847
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,757
Posts9,728,758
Members87,039
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: If one was to build a suppressed hunting rifle.... [Re: TXRobTRX] #7639691 10/23/19 12:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 142
F
FRA Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
F
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 142
Originally Posted by TXRobTRX
I do not claim to have anywhere near the experience that you guys have, but it seems to me that some are making this way too complex or expensive.

If you are staying short action, it seems to me a 308/6.5 in a decent aftermarket stock (or upgraded factory stock) with an 18" barrel shooting proven hunting rounds will be sub 1 MOA, function flawlessly, and will DRT at anything below 300 yards, which is 98% of the hunting being done. If you look at long action, then 270/30-06 or equivalent is the same thing.

Remington, Savage, Tikka, or Ruger all get the job done and your out the door built for less than $1,000 not counting optic or suppressor.

Genuinely curious - am I missing something in this discussion?


Sort of. As I posted earlier, with a velocity capped at around 1,000fps to be subsonic, you can only gain energy by more bullet mass. While the 6.5s and .308s are great supersonic, 6.5 bullets generally top out around 140gr. and pushed at subsonic velocity will give you about 300ft-lbs of energy at the muzzle...about 50-70ft-lbs less than a 115gr. 9mm. I don't think any of us are likely to recommend hunting with a 9mm, and certainly not out to 300 yards. .308 subsonic can give you a bit more energy, but you're still only at around 480ft-lbs, or about what a .45ACP pistol will give you.

If the original post-er is willing to remove the subsonic velocity cap and shoot supersonic through a suppressor, everything changes and you aren't missing a thing.

Re: If one was to build a suppressed hunting rifle.... [Re: txtrophy85] #7639803 10/23/19 02:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 854
Shane431 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 854
I had Chad build me a gun specifically for hunting and hitting some plates. It's a Tikka action, Krieger #5 barrel cut to 17", in a Manners EHTA stock. I also had him load up come ammo and went with Hornady 162 Eldm. I may change ammo for hunting as it didn't exactly do what I prefer in a hunting bullet tested on two Axis deer. But for shooting targets, the ammo is very accurate! Chad knows his stuff!

[Linked Image]

Re: If one was to build a suppressed hunting rifle.... [Re: FRA] #7639922 10/23/19 04:07 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,637
Q
QuitShootinYoungBucks Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Q
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,637
Originally Posted by FRA
Originally Posted by TXRobTRX
I do not claim to have anywhere near the experience that you guys have, but it seems to me that some are making this way too complex or expensive.

If you are staying short action, it seems to me a 308/6.5 in a decent aftermarket stock (or upgraded factory stock) with an 18" barrel shooting proven hunting rounds will be sub 1 MOA, function flawlessly, and will DRT at anything below 300 yards, which is 98% of the hunting being done. If you look at long action, then 270/30-06 or equivalent is the same thing.

Remington, Savage, Tikka, or Ruger all get the job done and your out the door built for less than $1,000 not counting optic or suppressor.

Genuinely curious - am I missing something in this discussion?


Sort of. As I posted earlier, with a velocity capped at around 1,000fps to be subsonic, you can only gain energy by more bullet mass. While the 6.5s and .308s are great supersonic, 6.5 bullets generally top out around 140gr. and pushed at subsonic velocity will give you about 300ft-lbs of energy at the muzzle...about 50-70ft-lbs less than a 115gr. 9mm. I don't think any of us are likely to recommend hunting with a 9mm, and certainly not out to 300 yards. .308 subsonic can give you a bit more energy, but you're still only at around 480ft-lbs, or about what a .45ACP pistol will give you.

If the original post-er is willing to remove the subsonic velocity cap and shoot supersonic through a suppressor, everything changes and you aren't missing a thing.


Unless I missed it, the original poster never mentioned subsonic, just suppressed.


[Linked Image]

https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
Re: If one was to build a suppressed hunting rifle.... [Re: QuitShootinYoungBucks] #7639931 10/23/19 04:19 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 142
F
FRA Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
F
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 142
Originally Posted by QuitShootinYoungBucks


Unless I missed it, the original poster never mentioned subsonic, just suppressed.


Rectal memory on my part combining what I read here and Chad's .28 Nosler subsonic thread.

Re: If one was to build a suppressed hunting rifle.... [Re: txtrophy85] #7639964 10/23/19 04:49 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,755
C
ccoker Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,755
I have two shorter barreled bolt actions, 16" 308 and 17" 7mm08
Both in McMillan stocks
the 308 started as a Tikka CTR that Morgan chopped and threaded at 16, sttock trigger and Mountain Tactical DBM for AI mags
I have ran 150g to 178 ELDX which is what I have settled on. It is very deadly and since I dial for elevation past 200 I wanted the heavy bullet for out to 500 yards hunting, more energy and less wind drift.

The 7mm08 started as a Savage lightweight hunter that had the barrel swapped for a McGowen that was tapered like an AR barrel, I run 140 Accubonds out of, Nosler's factory ammo, it was more accurate than anything else. Timney trigger, CDI DBM for AI mags

Both run Crux cans

This is my son's buck from last year, nice cull buck
[Linked Image]

My 308
[Linked Image]

Re: If one was to build a suppressed hunting rifle.... [Re: txtrophy85] #7641444 10/25/19 03:11 AM
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 132
T
TXRobTRX Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
T
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 132
FRA - agree with you if we are only discussing subsonic....

Re: If one was to build a suppressed hunting rifle.... [Re: FRA] #7641739 10/25/19 02:10 PM
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,320
C
Crews Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,320
Originally Posted by FRA


Sort of. As I posted earlier, with a velocity capped at around 1,000fps to be subsonic


Who gives a $hit about subsonic? I thought we were talking about hunting rifles. Subsonic and hunting shoudln't even be used in the same sentence for 99.99% of the practical use cases out there. You are really muddying up the waters here.

Re: If one was to build a suppressed hunting rifle.... [Re: Crews] #7641750 10/25/19 02:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 142
F
FRA Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
F
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 142
Originally Posted by Crews


Who gives a $hit about subsonic? I thought we were talking about hunting rifles. Subsonic and hunting shoudln't even be used in the same sentence for 99.99% of the practical use cases out there. You are really muddying up the waters here.


We've already hashed this out once that I was confusing two threads I was following about suppressed rifles. But, for your benefit as a fellow window-licker, here is the link to the other one on the Texas "Hunting" Forum about "subsonic."

https://texashuntingforum.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/topics/7630263/28-nosler-subsonic#Post7630263

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3