texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Josh-04512, dblmikeusa1, Hog-Pro, 4Notch, Niknoc76
72042 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,517
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,848
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,785
Posts9,729,135
Members87,042
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
GMC 6.2? #7415011 01/25/19 08:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 442
J
jcneef Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
J
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 442
Looking at getting new trucks. GMC has some pretty good incentives and gave me a great offer on my trade.

My question is should I go with the 6.2L EcoTec3 or just stay with the 5.3L EcoTec3? is the 6.2 worth the extra money? Thank for any input.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7415013 01/25/19 08:23 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,057
C
ChrisB Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,057
420 hp and 21mpg, I'd say it's worth it.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7415015 01/25/19 08:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 22,716
B
BigPig Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 22,716
That 6.2 is a bad mofo.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7415027 01/25/19 08:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 516
G
Gangly Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
G
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 516
Absolutely worth it, and resale it MUCH better with the 6.2 vs the 5.3.


Aaron

Do it right, do it once.
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: BigPig] #7415045 01/25/19 08:45 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 19,241
T
TEXASLEFTY Offline
THF Whiskey Sommelier
Offline
THF Whiskey Sommelier
T
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 19,241
Originally Posted by BigPig
That 6.2 is a bad mofo.


I agree! 6.2 all the way!


Originally Posted by Chunky Monkey
Never been to a camping world. I prefer Dick's to be honest.
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7415052 01/25/19 08:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 442
J
jcneef Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
J
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 442
looks like 6.2 for the win. I was between the GMC or the Ford with the Ecoboost… ford just wanted too much money

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7415624 01/26/19 04:00 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,088
J
jakebunch Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
J
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,088
Based on my very negative experience with the 5.3, the 6.2....absolutely.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7415626 01/26/19 04:03 PM
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,234
Chickenman Offline
Extremely Right Wing
Offline
Extremely Right Wing
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,234
The vortec 5.3 lacked too much for me.


[Linked Image]
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417344 01/28/19 10:34 PM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 339
P
Phlash Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
P
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 339
6.2l gets better fuel economy in the hills and towing. Get it and don't look back.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417346 01/28/19 10:39 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639
Q
QuitShootinYoungBucks Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Q
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639
When it comes to trucks, I'm a big fan of getting the largest engine you can in whatever platform you choose. I'd get the 6.2.


[Linked Image]

https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417353 01/28/19 10:50 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,535
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,535
I'd go 6.2 in the GM.

Last I looked the 6.2 was a pretty good option cost, I would have figured you could have gotten a comparable 3.5 ecoboost for less.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417385 01/28/19 11:19 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
I'm running a 6.2 and even with all the tools/gear I carry it out runs the 5.3.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417588 01/29/19 02:54 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,424
BOBO the Clown Offline
kind of a big deal
Offline
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,424
A 5.3 was made for go-carts... single riders ones at that.


Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417604 01/29/19 03:06 AM
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 9,717
M
Mickey Moose Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
M
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 9,717
Aside from my 6.2 "blowing up" and being replaced at about 10k miles I love it.


My botnet is bigger than yours.
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417632 01/29/19 03:40 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
R
REALKILLER Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
R
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,856
Sheww!! thought you were talkin about the 20horse 90s version of a turd


Recently got a gym membership, strange folks! I like to show up the roid zombies with my full motion curls with the 55lb. bells. Not their cheater short stroked light weights. It's holarious.
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417657 01/29/19 04:05 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 22,716
B
BigPig Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 22,716
My wife wanted a Tahoe, she rented one on a business trip for a week and decided that it was too slow, and that the 5.3 wasn’t going to cut it. The 6.2 wasn’t an option on the trim level she wanted. She bought an Armada, that motor will roll out in that 6000 pound pig.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417684 01/29/19 04:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,154
K
KWood_TSU Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
K
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,154
Don't go with the 5.3, terrible fuel mileage, and definitely lacking in the power. My old 4.7 dodge was ten times the motor the 5.3 is.


Amat Victoria Curam - Victory Loves Preparation
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417743 01/29/19 12:25 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,191
L
LonestarCobra Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
L
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 5,191
Sounds like the 5.3 is the modern day 305, that old engine was a turd as well.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: KWood_TSU] #7417802 01/29/19 01:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,535
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,535
Originally Posted by KWood_TSU
Don't go with the 5.3, terrible fuel mileage, and definitely lacking in the power. My old 4.7 dodge was ten times the motor the 5.3 is.

Now that is laughable. Ive never driven a more miserable truck than a 4.7 dodge.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: redchevy] #7417866 01/29/19 02:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,154
K
KWood_TSU Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
K
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,154
Originally Posted by redchevy
Originally Posted by KWood_TSU
Don't go with the 5.3, terrible fuel mileage, and definitely lacking in the power. My old 4.7 dodge was ten times the motor the 5.3 is.

Now that is laughable. Ive never driven a more miserable truck than a 4.7 dodge.

That's interesting, my 5.3 is a joke. I've never had problems with the engines on either one per se, except my gm now has the tick you hear on all of them.
Both trucks ran 20"wheels and the that 4.7 got better mileage with my 21'bass boat hooked up than the GM empty on the highway, and that's no lie.


Amat Victoria Curam - Victory Loves Preparation
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: jcneef] #7417870 01/29/19 02:44 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,535
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,535
You and I have polar opposite results.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: redchevy] #7417877 01/29/19 02:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,154
K
KWood_TSU Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
K
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,154
Originally Posted by redchevy
You and I have polar opposite results.

Hmmm, interesting. I just know I'll not own a GM anytime in the near future


Amat Victoria Curam - Victory Loves Preparation
Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: KWood_TSU] #7417911 01/29/19 03:12 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,448
A
aggiehunter03 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
A
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,448
Originally Posted by KWood_TSU
Originally Posted by redchevy
Originally Posted by KWood_TSU
Don't go with the 5.3, terrible fuel mileage, and definitely lacking in the power. My old 4.7 dodge was ten times the motor the 5.3 is.

Now that is laughable. Ive never driven a more miserable truck than a 4.7 dodge.

That's interesting, my 5.3 is a joke. I've never had problems with the engines on either one per se, except my gm now has the tick you hear on all of them.
Both trucks ran 20"wheels and the that 4.7 got better mileage with my 21'bass boat hooked up than the GM empty on the highway, and that's no lie.


We used to occasionally pull my Ranger bass boat with my grandad's Dodge 4.7. Most gutless engine I've ever seen. It would shift all the way down to second gear to pull hills. My 5.3 pulled just fine.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: LonestarCobra] #7418098 01/29/19 05:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 22,716
B
BigPig Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 22,716
Originally Posted by LonestarCobra
Sounds like the 5.3 is the modern day 305, that old engine was a turd as well.


I wouldn’t go that far. The 5.3 is a dam good engine and can easily see 200k miles with basic maintenance. It produces good power for its size. The problem is the transmission bolted to it. I drove a 5.3 backed by a 4L60E and it pulled like a tank in every gear, fast forward 15 years and it’s now an 8-speed with more power and it just feels gutless.

Re: GMC 6.2? [Re: BigPig] #7418162 01/29/19 07:17 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,535
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,535
Originally Posted by BigPig
Originally Posted by LonestarCobra
Sounds like the 5.3 is the modern day 305, that old engine was a turd as well.


I wouldn’t go that far. The 5.3 is a dam good engine and can easily see 200k miles with basic maintenance. It produces good power for its size. The problem is the transmission bolted to it. I drove a 5.3 backed by a 4L60E and it pulled like a tank in every gear, fast forward 15 years and it’s now an 8-speed with more power and it just feels gutless.

Nothing new and its not going away anytime soon. What do they call it, torque management? It is a safety feature manufacturers use to protect the transmission.

I read somewhere where the heavy duty trucks, or at least I think ram diesels are governed on power output until 3rd or 4th gear etc.


It's hell eatin em live
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3