Forums46
Topics537,810
Posts9,729,381
Members87,042
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Dumb Buzz question
#7370710
12/08/18 04:59 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,946
Buzzsaw
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,946 |
ok distance to the lands is 2.869 start at 2.849 ? Is this the magic .02 starting point. sorry math was not my thing
|
|
|
Re: Dumb Buzz question
[Re: Buzzsaw]
#7370731
12/08/18 05:35 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,942
ChadTRG42
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,942 |
Essentially yes. The math is correct. But which bullet and round are you loading this for? Different bullets have different sweet spots for jumping to the lands.
|
|
|
Re: Dumb Buzz question
[Re: Buzzsaw]
#7370737
12/08/18 05:43 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,877
Teal28
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,877 |
beat me to it
Last edited by Teal28; 12/08/18 05:44 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Dumb Buzz question
[Re: Buzzsaw]
#7370792
12/08/18 06:28 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,486
kmon11
junior
|
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,486 |
lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true Mainstream news might be fun to watch
|
|
|
Re: Dumb Buzz question
[Re: Buzzsaw]
#7370799
12/08/18 06:36 PM
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
TackDriver
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100 |
I always liked to start .005" off the lands ( single feed ) and go deeper gradually till I find the sweet spot.
If using magazines, i seat as long as it fits the magazines and go deeper if need be to find the sweet spot.
Last edited by TackDriver; 12/08/18 08:27 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Dumb Buzz question
[Re: Buzzsaw]
#7370835
12/08/18 07:16 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,423
jeffbird
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,423 |
I start 0.010" off of the lands as long as that will fit in the mag, or reduce down to 0.010" below mag length if needed. Shoot three shots of each charge weight on the ladder at 200 or 300 yards and the best load is usually very apparent. Moving to at least 200 yards really improves the quality of information. Many loads can look ok at 100 and really start opening up significantly at just 200 yards. Final loads need to be tested to at least the maximum anticipated shot distance, as groups can open up farther out. Any load that produces tight and accurate groups at long distances will be good at short distances, but the converse most definitely is not true. The ladder charge weights typically are loaded 0.2 grains for the last two grains up to max, or 0.3 for a high volume case like a 338 Lapua. Below that, each step is one shot at 0.3 increments starting at least three grains below max just to work up and make sure there are no excessive pressure warning signs. I have tried several different methods of load workup and found this method of at least three shots to produce the most reliable and repeatable loads. Also, three shots at each powder level reduce the influence of the driver nut coming loose now and then.
|
|
|
Re: Dumb Buzz question
[Re: Buzzsaw]
#7371690
12/09/18 09:49 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639
QuitShootinYoungBucks
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,639 |
Quick question-will seating depth change which load may be more accurate? Could 42.4 .010 off be more accurate than 42.6 .010, while 42.6 .020 off be more accurate than 42.4 .020, but not more than 42.4 .010?
https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
|
|
|
Re: Dumb Buzz question
[Re: Buzzsaw]
#7371756
12/09/18 11:45 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,423
jeffbird
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,423 |
QSYB,
it can, but not necessarily. Only change one variable at a time during testing so that each variable is isolated and optimized..
I have settled on starting with bullets 0.010” off the lands, and change only the charge weight.
That usually produces a good load. If it does not, then the best powder weight is held constant and seating depth tested changing 0.020” with three shots at each length.
|
|
|
Re: Dumb Buzz question
[Re: jeffbird]
#7372379
12/10/18 05:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,164
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,164 |
QSYB,
it can, but not necessarily. Only change one variable at a time during testing so that each variable is isolated and optimized..
I have settled on starting with bullets 0.010” off the lands, and change only the charge weight.
That usually produces a good load. If it does not, then the best powder weight is held constant and seating depth tested changing 0.020” with three shots at each length.
Agreed, though my numbers a a bit different. .005" off the lands, as long as I fit in the mag. Find the best charge, keep it, then change seating depth in .005" until it gets better. I rarely have to go mess with seating depth, though. Once, Judd was loading two rounds, hand them to me, and I'd shoot them. If they weren't very close together, we moved on. Once they tightened up, we kept going. Eventually they opened up again. We went back to the best shooting "jump" and he loaded 5 rounds. That was the winner. This was all done at 200 yards.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|