texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
TraeMartin, Beatixre, MooseSteed, Trappernewt, casyoo
71987 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,788
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,416
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,769
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,021
Posts9,719,489
Members86,987
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Bergmann's Rule #7116827 03/20/18 01:03 AM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 12,547
C
chital_shikari Offline OP
Minor in training
OP Offline
Minor in training
C
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 12,547
I glanced at the Wiki article because I remember reading in another article about 500lb WT that as latitude increases, so does body size in white tail deer.

I was talking to my "uncle" in GA this past week while we visited his cabin and lease near West Point, GA. He said Texas has much bigger deer than Georgia. I took him for his word but have been thinking about it since.

I know we have big deer, that's for certain. But how big?

In a rough guesstimation, I told him an average mature buck in Texas weighs around 180lb live weight--don't kill me, I don't know how accurate this is! He replied with "If a deer is 180lb here, it's like a 12-pt." Completely unscientific, but I think we can all understand the nonscientific backwoods comparison the two of us made: 180lb is a big deer in GA.

Mr. Paul Simone at Texana Springs Ranch in Hunt, TX once told me that the average WT doe in that area (his work with TPWD concentrated on Kerr WMA and of course management efforts on his current workplace of 2000 acres) weighed 80lb dressed out. We hunted with them in February of 2016 and all of our deer dressed out past 70lb with the biggest in the high 80s, if I remember correctly (all were doe except for 1 nubbin buck, which the ranch wanted dead anyway). I shot a 3.5/4.5 year old Madison County buck in 2010 that was around 100lb of meat and bone. I shot a Menard County 2.5/3.5 year old buck that was likely 60lb of meat and bone. That's how I got to the 180lb average weight for mature deer, considering that a) doe are smaller than bucks and b) I haven't shot a WT deer in the south or north of Texas, where I've heard (and witnessed) bigger deer and c) the bucks I've shot were not truly "mature."

Let me know your thoughts. I'm probably grossly ignorant on most of what I'm saying here (the paragraph above) and would like to know more. How closely does the white tail deer follow Bergmann's Rule, in your opinion, across both the USA and Texas?

Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7116944 03/20/18 03:08 AM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 13,591
1
1860.colt Online Content
emoji colt.45
Online Content
emoji colt.45
1
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 13,591
cheers think your fairly spot on. Never heard of the Bergmann Rule, but generaly farther north, bigger the deer. scratch thinking further north cooler temps, it needs the extra body weight ta servive. Their is differance in average size here than texas cool thread
flag



i'm postaddic
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7117208 03/20/18 01:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,769
W
Wytex Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
W
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 3,769
You can also see Bergmann's rule effects on antelope. If you travel up farther north you will definitely see the influence on whitetails.
Much larger body size and smaller ears. I've noticed the mule deer in Texas and south have much larger ears for heat dissipation. In agricultural areas up here and especially in Canada you will find bucks that push 300 lbs, mostly in agricultural areas of Canada and North Dakota. By ag I mean even just irrigated meadow hay .
The rule manifests itself even just up into Kansas and Nebraska.

Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7117209 03/20/18 01:37 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,218
Double Naught Spy Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Happy
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,218
Bergmann's Rule is a "rule" and not a "law." It only refers to generalities size clades in warm blooded animals and is not tied to latitude, but temperature/climate. Latitude only comes into play when there is a significant difference in temperature/climate. Warm-blooded animals in colder areas tend to be bulkier. Bergmann's Rule was formulated in the 1800s without consideration for contrary genetic factors, nutrition, etc.

So you are comparing Georgia and Texas. Georgia is within the same latitudes of Texas. So by latitude, the rule doesn't work at all. Texas extends farther north and south. So I would not expect to see a huge difference in size based on latitude. Georgia is slightly cooler than Texas, however, but this is not a latitude issue, but a weather pattern issue. Even so, it is not significantly different throughout much of the year.

Bergmann's doesn't even work in Texas for latitude or temperature where warmer south Texas deer are often larger than cooler central Texas deer.


Hogdalorian - Si vis pacem cum sus, para bellum.
My Videos https://www.youtube.com/user/HornHillRange
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7117215 03/20/18 01:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,780
T
txtrophy85 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,780
Genetics and local nutrition play a part in it too.

A big south texas whitetail will weigh 240 or better on the hoof pre rut

I have buddies from Mississippi who shoot deer the same size as we do in south Texas, but they drive 40 miles and get into the delta and body weights increase 50 lbs. better groceries is the main factor

But as a whole I agree with Bergman’s rule.



For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7117451 03/20/18 04:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,102
Bbear Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,102
In support of the 'better foods - more weight' side of the discussion; on a Llano county lease when we started taking more does off of the property as well as some of the old spikes and leaving deer to get older, our records showed:
When we started-
-average doe field dressed was 68 pounds
-average 8 point dressed was 74 pounds
-average age of a doe was 4.5 years of age (oldest was 9 or so)
-average age of an 8 pt was 2.5 (oldest was 3.5)
After 5 years of reducing the herd-
-average doe field dressed 52 lbs
-average 8 pt field dressed 105 lbs
-average age of a doe was 1.5
-average age of an 8pt was 4.5

I moved to Missouri after year 5 and took a whitetail doe there that field dressed 150 lbs. I would see several pictures at local check stations there of bucks weighing from 175-250 lbs live weight.

I hunted in Finland (about as far north as southern Alaska) and a white tail doe one of the guys took was estimated to weigh 100 kilos (approx 220 lbs) field dressed. I saw a 6 pt that looked to be about the size of a young steer.


[IMG][/IMG]

Pay it forward - Kids are the future.

Rifles are similar to boats and young women...there's no end to how much money you can pour into them without making them any more useful.
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: Bbear] #7117461 03/20/18 04:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: Bbear
In support of the 'better foods - more weight' side of the discussion; on a Llano county lease when we started taking more does off of the property as well as some of the old spikes and leaving deer to get older, our records showed:
When we started-
-average doe field dressed was 68 pounds
-average 8 point dressed was 74 pounds
-average age of a doe was 4.5 years of age (oldest was 9 or so)
-average age of an 8 pt was 2.5 (oldest was 3.5)
After 5 years of reducing the herd-
-average doe field dressed 52 lbs
-average 8 pt field dressed 105 lbs
-average age of a doe was 1.5
-average age of an 8pt was 4.5

I moved to Missouri after year 5 and took a whitetail doe there that field dressed 150 lbs. I would see several pictures at local check stations there of bucks weighing from 175-250 lbs live weight.

I hunted in Finland (about as far north as southern Alaska) and a white tail doe one of the guys took was estimated to weigh 100 kilos (approx 220 lbs) field dressed. I saw a 6 pt that looked to be about the size of a young steer.


Maybe those figures reversed?


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7117494 03/20/18 04:57 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
S
stxranchman Offline
Obie Juan Kenobi
Offline
Obie Juan Kenobi
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
In the same location and in the same state, nutrition and age play a huge part.


Are idiots multiplying faster than normal people?[Linked Image]
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118115 03/21/18 02:39 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 441
V
VAFish Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
V
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 441
We have little deer here in VA. And we are definitely further north than Texas.


"If your plan is for one year, plant rice.
If your plan is for ten years, plant trees.
If your plan is for one hundred years, educate children."
-- Confucius
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118159 03/21/18 03:42 AM
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,091
W
Wacm Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
W
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,091
Doesn’t really apply. Our hill country does that are fully mature might average 80 lbs but a mesquite country south TX doe will easily push over 120.

North Tx panhandle deer get even bigger. I shot a doe last year the cleared 180.

Poplulation density and food quality play a role without a dought.

Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118160 03/21/18 03:42 AM
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,091
W
Wacm Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
W
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,091
Doesn’t really apply. Our hill country does that are fully mature might average 80 lbs but a mesquite country south TX doe will easily push over 120.

North Tx panhandle deer get even bigger. I shot a doe last year the cleared 180.

Poplulation density and food quality play a role without a dought.

Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118225 03/21/18 10:53 AM
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,810
R
RattlesnakeDan Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
R
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,810
There is a reason that cattle drives that started in Texas ended in Montana. Food quality especially grasses are that much better to make that journey worth while. Then off to the Dakota's to auction.


Just like Jesus, sometimes you gotta kill some hogs.
Lone Star Mesquite . com
RattleSnake Dan's Shredding Service
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118370 03/21/18 01:03 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,364
C
Choctaw Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,364
How many cattle drives started in Texas and went all the way to Montana? Which trail did they use?

Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: RattlesnakeDan] #7118866 03/21/18 08:57 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,270
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,270
Originally Posted By: RattlesnakeDan
There is a reason that cattle drives that started in Texas ended in Montana. Food quality especially grasses are that much better to make that journey worth while. Then off to the Dakota's to auction.


Negative

Cattle doing good or bad in Montana is an example of Bergman’s as to why certain variants of the two Aurochs sub sets do better in colder clients( the bigger species evolved in cold clients with regards to winter and the smaller evolved in warmers clients). Since Cattle are imported/cross breed etc to America they would be a poor example of an evolutionary change.

Really cattle are bad example of Bergman’s because of cross breeding of cattle over such a short time span, they don’t have a natural evolution for say anymore

Polar bears are the largest bears in the world, “Canadian” wolves are bigger then “Mexican” Wolves Etc are better examples.

Over all Bergman’s is just a small peice a whole lot of factors in animal size, and Bergman’s is often proven inaccurate, example would be African Elephants


Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118904 03/21/18 09:35 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481
Wonder how elephants in Africa compare in size to whooley mamoths that I would "think" lived in colder climates.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118905 03/21/18 09:37 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481
If you take supplemental feeding out of the question and agriculture how much do south texas bucks weigh? Most of the deer I see or hear about being well over 200 lbs are very well fed.

On a place we used to hunt in the hill country we observed long term dressed weights increase by about 20 lbs by bringing population numbers down.


It's hell eatin em live
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118915 03/21/18 09:46 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,422
J
jeffbird Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,422
Chital,

very good topic. There are some confounding variables. First, there are several subspecies of White-tailed deer. Before hunting was regulated with seasons and bag limits, deer numbers were dramatically reduced. Then during the Great Depression, they were hunted heavily for subsistence and really reduced in numbers, down into the 100's of 1,000's, and completely extirpated in many areas. After WW2, efforts were made around the country to reintroduce deer to areas where they had been wiped out. So, there are Texas subspecies in Georgia, as well as northern subspecies in Georgia. So, things are a mixed bag at this point. But to your point, body weights can vary significantly based on subspecies, food and water availability, hunting pressure and regulations affecting age, and other factors such losses to habitat destruction, degradation of water quality, and disease.

Please consider joining the Quality Deer Management Association. Their magazine provides some excellent content, and has nice deer photos too.


https://www.qdma.com/


Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118917 03/21/18 09:51 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
It’s a general rule of thumb only.
It is an inter-species rule. It does not attempt to say there are not big animals in warm climates.


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: redchevy] #7118948 03/21/18 10:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
S
stxranchman Offline
Obie Juan Kenobi
Offline
Obie Juan Kenobi
S
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 60,296
Originally Posted By: redchevy
If you take supplemental feeding out of the question and agriculture how much do south texas bucks weigh? Most of the deer I see or hear about being well over 200 lbs are very well fed.

On a place we used to hunt in the hill country we observed long term dressed weights increase by about 20 lbs by bringing population numbers down.

There were some 200 lb field dress deer killed in parts of South Texas back in the 60's and 70's in areas within CC and in wet years well before HF and feed was the craze.


Are idiots multiplying faster than normal people?[Linked Image]
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: stxranchman] #7118953 03/21/18 10:26 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,270
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,270
Originally Posted By: stxranchman
Originally Posted By: redchevy
If you take supplemental feeding out of the question and agriculture how much do south texas bucks weigh? Most of the deer I see or hear about being well over 200 lbs are very well fed.

On a place we used to hunt in the hill country we observed long term dressed weights increase by about 20 lbs by bringing population numbers down.

There were some 200 lb field dress deer killed in parts of South Texas back in the 60's and 70's in areas within CC and in wet years well before HF and feed was the craze.


We probably had 200lb hill country deer before fire suppression

Last edited by BOBO the Clown; 03/21/18 11:09 PM. Reason: CWD moment

Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: BOBO the Clown] #7118975 03/21/18 10:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 12,547
C
chital_shikari Offline OP
Minor in training
OP Offline
Minor in training
C
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 12,547
Originally Posted By: BOBO the Clown
Originally Posted By: stxranchman
Originally Posted By: redchevy
If you take supplemental feeding out of the question and agriculture how much do south texas bucks weigh? Most of the deer I see or hear about being well over 200 lbs are very well fed.

On a place we used to hunt in the hill country we observed long term dressed weights increase by about 20 lbs by bringing population numbers down.

There were some 200 lb field dress deer killed in parts of South Texas back in the 60's and 70's in areas within CC and in wet years well before HF and feed was the craze.


Probably 200lb deer hill country became fire suppression
redchevy brought up a great point. stxranchman, I'll ask you since you provided a great answer, was that the norm or the exception? And BOBO I don't really understand what you mean by that.

Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7118994 03/21/18 11:08 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,270
BOBO the Clown Online Content
kind of a big deal
Online Content
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,270
Originally Posted By: chital_shikari
Originally Posted By: BOBO the Clown
Originally Posted By: stxranchman
Originally Posted By: redchevy
If you take supplemental feeding out of the question and agriculture how much do south texas bucks weigh? Most of the deer I see or hear about being well over 200 lbs are very well fed.

On a place we used to hunt in the hill country we observed long term dressed weights increase by about 20 lbs by bringing population numbers down.

There were some 200 lb field dress deer killed in parts of South Texas back in the 60's and 70's in areas within CC and in wet years well before HF and feed was the craze.


Probably 200lb deer hill country became fire suppression
redchevy brought up a great point. stxranchman, I'll ask you since you provided a great answer, was that the norm or the exception? And BOBO I don't really understand what you mean by that.


I fixed it I had a CWD moment.

Essentially the landscape has changed also, historically Hill country wasn’t a cedar forrest, and natural fires increased forage.

Modern Applications of Bergman’s are more generalizations because of changes.

Another example of a rift is largest Elk in North America are Rasberry and afognak island, but they are not native to the area, imported....

I use to think Predator wise Bergman’s was always spot on, except south east blk bears tend to toss a few wrenches in though,



Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: BOBO the Clown] #7119012 03/21/18 11:21 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 12,547
C
chital_shikari Offline OP
Minor in training
OP Offline
Minor in training
C
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 12,547
Originally Posted By: BOBO the Clown
I fixed it I had a CWD moment.

Essentially the landscape has changed also, historically Hill country wasn’t a cedar forrest, and natural fires increased forage.

Modern Applications if Bergman’s are more generalizations because of changes.

Largest Elk in North America are Rasberry and afognak island, but they are not native to the area, imported

I gotcha

Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: chital_shikari] #7119023 03/21/18 11:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,829
Adchunts Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,829
I agree with this being a valid premise. Of course, there are exceptions to every rule. Lots of southern deer herds have had different genetics brought in, and deer breeders have managed their herds for larger deer. Pretty sure that sans human manipulation, the average deer size in southern (warmer) climates would be substantially smaller than their northern cousins.

Having said that, food plays a significant role. I have seen Arkansas River bottom deer (think soybean and corn country) that were almost twice the size of the mountain deer just 50 miles away.

Re: Bergmann's Rule [Re: BOBO the Clown] #7119461 03/22/18 01:20 PM
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481
R
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
R
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 39,481
Originally Posted By: BOBO the Clown
Originally Posted By: stxranchman
Originally Posted By: redchevy
If you take supplemental feeding out of the question and agriculture how much do south texas bucks weigh? Most of the deer I see or hear about being well over 200 lbs are very well fed.

On a place we used to hunt in the hill country we observed long term dressed weights increase by about 20 lbs by bringing population numbers down.

There were some 200 lb field dress deer killed in parts of South Texas back in the 60's and 70's in areas within CC and in wet years well before HF and feed was the craze.


We probably had 200lb hill country deer before fire suppression


So leaving out the protein feed and the exceptions to the rule in wet years, what would you consider to be an average weight for a mature south texas buck? Not the biggest one, but an average one? dressed or live?


It's hell eatin em live
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3