texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
TraeMartin, Beatixre, MooseSteed, Trappernewt, casyoo
71987 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,788
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,416
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,768
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics536,995
Posts9,719,273
Members86,987
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight #7027892 01/07/18 05:22 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Sometimes I chase my tail chasing accuracy, and I am sure some of you do. I am pretty sure picking the wrong OCW is one of the reasons. When I do a load development, I see ugly groups or three holes but pick the nice one hole group as my go to load but when you see changes of temp, your one hole group is now a 3 shot group. Back to square 1!!
Perhaps you guys can help me with your opinions.

I did two OCW tests today round robin style, top line is the .308 with the IMR4064 and 168 VLD and the bottom line is the 6.5 Creedmoor with H4350 and 140 Hybrids.

If some of you OCW gurus could help me narrow my search for the OCW to pick,,,next will be the jump test. ( Seating depth test )

I looked at the top line on the target which is the .308 and chose #2, 3 and 4 as my OCW.
As for the bottom line on the target which is the 6.5 Creed, I chose #1,2 and 3 as my OCW.

I see those 3 shot groups I picked which are very close on the same line and POI.

Would you guys agree? Of course the jump test is after I pick the middle charge between the 3 groups. What do you guys pick?

I think this is a learning experience most of us could benefit when we do our load developments and learn to read OCW and pick the correct OCW.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/pxhCBiEl.jpg?1[/img]

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028080 01/07/18 01:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
.308 Win, 43.0 gr is where I would stay.

6.5 Creedmoor, I would load up to 43.0 gr and see if it gets better. None of those give me the warm fuzzy. 41.3 gr looks best, and I bet that's your low node. Good chance 41.0 would be pretty good, too.

I'm on the same page as you. When one groups very well, I want the charge lower, and the charge higher to have grouped fairly well, also.

Temp changes do not affect how well one groups if one is using a temp stable powder. Of course, even temp stable powders can over-pressure once summer hits, if the load was at max or above.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028182 01/07/18 03:01 PM
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15,128
Tbar Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 15,128
Originally Posted By: TackDriver
Sometimes I chase my tail chasing accuracy, and I am sure some of you do. I am pretty sure picking the wrong OCW is one of the reasons. When I do a load development, I see ugly groups or three holes but pick the nice one hole group as my go to load but when you see changes of temp, your one hole group is now a 3 shot group. Back to square 1!!
Perhaps you guys can help me with your opinions.

I did two OCW tests today round robin style, top line is the .308 with the IMR4064 and 168 VLD and the bottom line is the 6.5 Creedmoor with H4350 and 140 Hybrids.

If some of you OCW gurus could help me narrow my search for the OCW to pick,,,next will be the jump test. ( Seating depth test )

I looked at the top line on the target which is the .308 and chose #2, 3 and 4 as my OCW.
As for the bottom line on the target which is the 6.5 Creed, I chose #1,2 and 3 as my OCW.

I see those 3 shot groups I picked which are very close on the same line and POI.

Would you guys agree? Of course the jump test is after I pick the middle charge between the 3 groups. What do you guys pick?

I think this is a learning experience most of us could benefit when we do our load developments and learn to read OCW and pick the correct OCW.


Make America Great Again

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: J.G.] #7028211 01/07/18 03:29 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
.308 Win, 43.0 gr is where I would stay.

6.5 Creedmoor, I would load up to 43.0 gr and see if it gets better. None of those give me the warm fuzzy. 41.3 gr looks best, and I bet that's your low node. Good chance 41.0 would be pretty good, too.

I'm on the same page as you. When one groups very well, I want the charge lower, and the charge higher to have grouped fairly well, also.

Temp changes do not affect how well one groups if one is using a temp stable powder. Of course, even temp stable powders can over-pressure once summer hits, if the load was at max or above.


Added the chrono velocities from the test.

.308:
1. 2705-2697-2685
2. 2716-2715-2711
3. 2740-2718-2735
4. 2740-2734-2737
5. 2766-2753-2761
6. 2772-2771-2764
7. 2791-2810-2733

6.5 Creedmoor
1. 2698-2728-2739
2. 2714-2742-2752
3. 2749-2751-2758
4. 2768-2773-2779
5. 2773-2807-2811

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028229 01/07/18 03:44 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
No offense meant when I ask this.

Now that we have chrono data, .308 Win, 42.7 gr looks like a low ES. 6.5 Creedmoor 41.9 gr does as well. Could the worsening of group be shooter error?


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028246 01/07/18 03:59 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 680
E
Eyesofahunter Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 680
I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: J.G.] #7028265 01/07/18 04:15 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
No offense meant when I ask this.

Now that we have chrono data, .308 Win, 42.7 gr looks like a low ES. 6.5 Creedmoor 41.9 gr does as well. Could the worsening of group be shooter error?


For the .308, #4 ES is great as well, but picking that charge with #5 next to it is a disaster, see that bad POI shift.

For the 6.5 Creed, the last two is not shooter error, I was pretty much careful with each shot. But trying the 2nd to last group can be done. I do agree that the 41.9 group does look nice with horizontal grouping.

The 6.5 Hybrid is .020" off the lands, single fed and don't fit in the mag, I wanted to see if it shoots better since my last which is the first test shot pretty well ( virgin brass ) with .080" off the lands and fits in the mag. I like testing with fireformed brass. I should pick a OCW and do the seating depth test round robin style. 6.5 Creed has only 115 rounds down the tube.

Last edited by TackDriver; 01/07/18 04:19 PM.
Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: Eyesofahunter] #7028275 01/07/18 04:20 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.


I would cringe with choosing 43.3 grains. See the next group with bad POI shift. I do agree it has real nice horizontal grouping.

Last edited by TackDriver; 01/07/18 04:21 PM.
Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028276 01/07/18 04:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
It's more difficult to help when things are not referred to in charge weight. I keep having to toggle back and forth.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: J.G.] #7028281 01/07/18 04:25 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
It's more difficult to help when things are not referred to in charge weight. I keep having to toggle back and forth.


Side note, I did not have a Type S full sizing bushing die before I loaded those. I used a body die and ran them through a Redding neck sizer with the bushing. The Type S die just came in, would it make a difference if I shot the same loads again with the new die?

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028290 01/07/18 04:57 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
I doubt it. Those dies you already used are no doubt high quality.

Is it possible to test at 200 yards or more?


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028306 01/07/18 05:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 680
E
Eyesofahunter Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 680
Originally Posted By: TackDriver
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.


I would cringe with choosing 43.3 grains. See the next group with bad POI shift. I do agree it has real nice horizontal grouping.


To each his own, that is the load I would run without reservation based on what I have seen so far.

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028308 01/07/18 05:23 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,791
B
Buzzsaw Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,791
No offense when I say this, but why are you even asking this? its obvious your gun is a shooter @ 100 yards.

I agree with Jason , you have good "node." now stretch it out and quit wasting bullets and powder banana


SPACE FOR RENT


Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: J.G.] #7028313 01/07/18 05:30 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
I doubt it. Those dies you already used are no doubt high quality.

Is it possible to test at 200 yards or more?


I can do that, I'll narrow on the picked charges to .2 increments at 300. See what pops up.

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: Eyesofahunter] #7028316 01/07/18 05:34 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
Originally Posted By: TackDriver
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.


I would cringe with choosing 43.3 grains. See the next group with bad POI shift. I do agree it has real nice horizontal grouping.


To each his own, that is the load I would run without reservation based on what I have seen so far.


I'll include that charge on the next test at 300 yards soon. If your theory is correct, I'll buy you a burger when I am in town. cheers

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028319 01/07/18 05:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 680
E
Eyesofahunter Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 680
Originally Posted By: TackDriver
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
Originally Posted By: TackDriver
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.


I would cringe with choosing 43.3 grains. See the next group with bad POI shift. I do agree it has real nice horizontal grouping.


To each his own, that is the load I would run without reservation based on what I have seen so far.


I'll include that charge on the next test at 300 yards soon. If your theory is correct, I'll buy you a burger when I am in town. cheers


I hope you find the load you want regardless, just sharing what has worked for me, we all have our own way do getting there, and maybe we can learn something from one another along the way. cheers

If it works we can meet at Hill Top Cafe, Fredericksburg. food

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: Eyesofahunter] #7028328 01/07/18 06:18 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,791
B
Buzzsaw Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,791
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
Originally Posted By: TackDriver
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
Originally Posted By: TackDriver
[quote=Eyesofahunter]I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.


I would cringe with choosing 43.3 grains. See the next group with bad POI shift. I do agree it has real nice horizontal grouping.


To each his own, that is the load I would run without reservation based on what I have seen so far.


I'll include that charge on the next test at 300 yards soon. If your theory is correct, I'll buy you a burger when I am in town. cheers


I hope you find the load you want regardless, just sharing what has worked for me, we all have our own way do getting there, and maybe we can learn something from one another along the way. cheers

If it works we can meet at Hill Top Cafe, Fredericksburg. food [/qu
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.


What rifle Eyes? Barrel length? 6.5 Creed


SPACE FOR RENT


Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028329 01/07/18 06:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,083
When shooting a cartridge/ bullet combo I am familiar with. And if I believe the rifle and optic capable, I group shoot 200 yards. The groups are easier to read. It can end up scrutinizing 1/8" rather than hundredths of inch.

Give me a combo I am not familiar with, and if the optic is capable, I will ladder test at 300 or 500 yards, followed by group shooting at the same distance. Even then, a 300 yard ladder test can be tough to read for someone not well practiced in it.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: Buzzsaw] #7028339 01/07/18 06:32 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 680
E
Eyesofahunter Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
E
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 680
Originally Posted By: Buzzsaw
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
Originally Posted By: TackDriver
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
[quote=TackDriver][quote=Eyesofahunter]I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.


I would cringe with choosing 43.3 grains. See the next group with bad POI shift. I do agree it has real nice horizontal grouping.


To each his own, that is the load I would run without reservation based on what I have seen so far.


I'll include that charge on the next test at 300 yards soon. If your theory is correct, I'll buy you a burger when I am in town. cheers


I hope you find the load you want regardless, just sharing what has worked for me, we all have our own way do getting there, and maybe we can learn something from one another along the way. cheers

If it works we can meet at Hill Top Cafe, Fredericksburg. food [/qu
Originally Posted By: Eyesofahunter
I like the 43.3 for the 308. And the 41.9 for the 6.5.
I always look for the lowest vertical dispersion in the powder charge then tune horizontal with seating depths. I shoot mine at 300 or 400 so the vertical is easier to pick out, but the chrono data with those two look good to me. My 6.5 load is 41.9 aa4350 with a 143 eld-x.


What rifle Eyes? Barrel length? 6.5 Creed [/quote]

24 inch HCR Course Rifle

Re: Figuring out Optimal Charge Weight [Re: TackDriver] #7028360 01/07/18 07:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 154
2
240z Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
2
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 154
I would go with load # 4 four the 308, and #3 for the Creedmore. From the looks of the groups you have selected good choices in both powder and primers. Those groups have minimal vertical stringing and good deviation numbers.
I would start tweaking bullet seating depth to see if that might shrink them more.


Harley Davidson Motorcycles.....the most efficent way to convert gasoline into noise, without the side effects of Horsepower.
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3