texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Krystian, NTXwhitetail, MichaelC, cnstarr23, Skuff Daddy
72794 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 66,475
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 45,654
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics547,034
Posts9,843,072
Members87,794
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
7mm-08 vs .270 #6093470 12/20/15 08:28 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 648
T
themoonrulz Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 648
Hey fellas I'm planning on purchasing a new tikka and want to get y'all's opinions. I've done a lot of research on the .270 and the 7mm-08 but I'm torn. I've owned a 270 and it was great.

I'm looking for:
1) accuracy
2) power
3) range

The gun will be used mostly for deer/hogs but eventually I want to be able to use it for elk/mule deer.

I don't reload so bullet cost and availability comes into consideration as well. I appreciate y'alls input!!!

Which gun
single choice
Votes accepted starting: 12/20/15 08:27 PM

A real hunter never returns empty handed. Spending time in the wilderness temporarily satifies the soul, but leaves us longing for more.
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093481 12/20/15 08:39 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,200
T
tth_40 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,200
I have both, load for both and love both.

For the ranges I hunt (400 yds. and under) I use them interchangeably.

To be fair however, my go-to is a T3 .30-'06 with my 165 grain handloads.

They ALL do the job well.



Originally Posted By: theserxtremedays
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093490 12/20/15 08:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,514
J.G. Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,514
Because you said accuracy, power, range, mule deer and elk, I have to go with .30-06 from the choices you listed. Long action holding more powder, pushing a higher BC, heavier bullet than the rest of the options. And you not being a hand loader, the .30-06 has a gigantic list of ammo options for you to try. I'd stick with the 180 gr. bullet area. I don't know what kind of range you are talking about, but that can get into a whole other discussion on proper optics.

This will go on for several pages, and many people will throw out lots of other cartridge suggestions, but I stuck with the list you gave.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093514 12/20/15 09:10 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,869
R
RiverRider Online Sleepy
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Sleepy
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,869
JG's right on the money.


[Linked Image]

"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty."

-Augustus McRae
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093553 12/20/15 09:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,606
syncerus Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,606
I also agree with JG and RR.


NRA Patriot Benefactor & DSC Lifer
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: J.G.] #6093557 12/20/15 09:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 23,317
B
BigPig Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 23,317
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
Because you said accuracy, power, range, mule deer and elk, I have to go with .30-06 from the choices you listed. Long action holding more powder, pushing a higher BC, heavier bullet than the rest of the options. And you not being a hand loader, the .30-06 has a gigantic list of ammo options for you to try. I'd stick with the 180 gr. bullet area. I don't know what kind of range you are talking about, but that can get into a whole other discussion on proper optics.

This will go on for several pages, and many people will throw out lots of other cartridge suggestions, but I stuck with the list you gave.


I voted for the 270 because I have that caliber and love it. But if you are serious about chasing elk with it then I'd go 30-06, 270 will prob work, but I like 30 cal holes in large animals


Wade Dews, REALTOR ®
Rendon Realty, LLC
Frontline Real Estate Team
www.RendonRealty.com
WadeDews@gmail.com
214-356-2410
Up to 1% for closing costs for First Responders & Veterans
Proudly partnered with Assist The Officer Foundation https://atodallas.org/
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093640 12/20/15 10:56 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 34
B
brennansgrandpa Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
B
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 34
You can drop down in bullet size to make the 30 caliber feel like the 270, but the 270 will never give you the ft/lbs of energy you need for a big animal like an elk. 30 is the right choice.

Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: brennansgrandpa] #6093662 12/20/15 11:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,137
T
txtrophy85 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,137
Originally Posted By: brennansgrandpa
You can drop down in bullet size to make the 30 caliber feel like the 270, but the 270 will never give you the ft/lbs of energy you need for a big animal like an elk. 30 is the right choice.


You know how many elk have been killed with a .270?


For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: txtrophy85] #6093672 12/20/15 11:17 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,514
J.G. Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,514
How many have been killed with a .30-06?

And so it begins....


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093685 12/20/15 11:20 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,281
J
jeepercreeper Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
J
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 5,281
And how many whitetail that have been killed with a 223?

Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093700 12/20/15 11:31 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 648
T
themoonrulz Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 648
Haha I'm not trying to start a flame war but I honestly just want to know what my best option is if I'm going to buy a nice rifle top it with a nice scope.

I pondered the 30-06 but I've heard that it's a relatively inaccurate round when compared to .270/7mm-08/308. At least that's what some of the old fellas at the lease told me. If anyone can vouch for the accuracy of a Tikka T3 in 30-06 than that may be the route of I have go.

Again, I do apperciate everyone's input. I've lost some sleep over this. sleep


A real hunter never returns empty handed. Spending time in the wilderness temporarily satifies the soul, but leaves us longing for more.
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: J.G.] #6093710 12/20/15 11:35 PM
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,801
C
colt45-90 Offline
Texas colt45
Offline
Texas colt45
C
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,801
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
How many have been killed with a .30-06?

And so it begins....
probably about like how many wt have been killed with .223 cheers


hold on Newt, we got a runaway
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093711 12/20/15 11:36 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,606
syncerus Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,606
The accuracy thing is a fantasy. In target rifles, there is a real and theoretical advantage to short, fat cartridges as pioneered by the 6mm PPC. In a hunting rifle, too many other factors take precedence. The Tikka, in any of the available cartridges, will shoot better than you can.


NRA Patriot Benefactor & DSC Lifer
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: jeepercreeper] #6093716 12/20/15 11:39 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,137
T
txtrophy85 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,137
Originally Posted By: jeepercreeper
And how many whitetail that have been killed with a 223?


7 or 8 at least


For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093727 12/20/15 11:46 PM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 19,983
Roll-Tide Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 19,983
Educate me...I have a 270 and 3030.

There is talk a 270 is not big enough for an elk. I read another topic about 30/30 for elk and everyone on that topic thought a 30/30 was great for elk.

I would rather shoot a deer with my 270 than my 30/30.............

Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: Roll-Tide] #6093744 12/20/15 11:59 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,137
T
txtrophy85 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 33,137
Originally Posted By: Roll-Tide
Educate me...I have a 270 and 3030.

There is talk a 270 is not big enough for an elk. I read another topic about 30/30 for elk and everyone on that topic thought a 30/30 was great for elk.

I would rather shoot a deer with my 270 than my 30/30.............


Exactly

A .270 is a whole heck of a lot more powerful than a .30-30


For it is not the quarry that we truly seek, but the adventure.
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: Roll-Tide] #6093756 12/21/15 12:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,514
J.G. Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 42,514
I'm just ribbing. I like to poke 270 lovers.

Will the 7mm-08 and the .270 kill elk and mule deer? Sure.

Of the options listed, if I had to pick one rifle to hunt with for the rest of my life, I'd pick the .30-06.

As far as .30-06 not being accurate, that's nonsense. Those guys may be repeating what they've been told, and/ or have never tried to make one shoot one ragged hole with a tuned hand load, or have tried a wide variety of mass produced ammo. They put a 3-9X duplex Bushnell, Nikon, or Leuopld on it, load it with Core Lockts, flinch like hell when they shoot it, and blame inaccuracy on the .30-06.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093775 12/21/15 12:19 AM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,090
RedSnake Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 4,090
How bout getting a tikka 270, slap on a 7mm barrel, and have it chambered in 280 Ackley. That's what I did and I love it! Gets you the benefit of high ballistic coefficient 7mm projectiles and the extra case capacity for a little more umph than the 270.

Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093777 12/21/15 12:23 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,499
C
charlesb Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,499
I'd go with the 270, from the choices given. Somewhere in-between a 6.5-06 and a 280, the 270 is... Perfect in many ways.

With the new bullets and new powders, it's not the same old 270 that Jack O'Connor did so well with. - It's better.


Kind regards, charlesb


Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093792 12/21/15 12:36 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,436
S
scalebuster Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 6,436
Why ask these questions? You know what your going to buy. You've studied it on the Internet for weeks and decided they're both the same out to 400. How many men on this forum do you think have killed deer at that distance? Not many.
Most of these folks sit in a stand like you will and shoot a deer at an exact 100 yards. 125 on the long end. Buy what you have confidence in. I shot a .270 my whole life. It was stolen out of my truck and I bought a 7-08. It doesn't kill them any deader.

Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: scalebuster] #6093794 12/21/15 12:37 AM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,247
Grizz Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 12,247
Originally Posted By: scalebuster
Why ask these questions? You know what your going to buy. You've studied it on the Internet for weeks and decided they're both the same out to 400. How many men on this forum do you think have killed deer at that distance? Not many.
Most of these folks sit in a stand like you will and shoot a deer at an exact 100 yards. 125 on the long end. Buy what you have confidence in. I shot a .270 my whole life. It was stolen out of my truck and I bought a 7-08. It doesn't kill them any deader.


Or any less deader. grin


[Linked Image] [Linked Image]
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: Roll-Tide] #6093850 12/21/15 01:14 AM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
N
Nogalus Prairie Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
N
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 27,091
Originally Posted By: Roll-Tide
Educate me...I have a 270 and 3030.

There is talk a 270 is not big enough for an elk. I read another topic about 30/30 for elk and everyone on that topic thought a 30/30 was great for elk.

I would rather shoot a deer with my 270 than my 30/30.............


The .30-30 thread was restricted to a cow elk at 125 yards and under. Those were his stated parameters.


Originally Posted by Russ79
I learned long ago you can't reason someone out of something they don't reason themselves into.


Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6093910 12/21/15 01:52 AM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 16,725
6
603Country Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
6
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 16,725
I'd get the 270. It's all he needs.


Not my monkeys, not my circus...
Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6094137 12/21/15 04:04 AM
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 75
Obi Wan Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 75

Re: 7mm-08 vs .270 [Re: themoonrulz] #6094178 12/21/15 04:49 AM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
P
postoak Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
.280 Remington. smile


Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3