texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Pkmc03, bobby38, wingmaster23, 4x4erik, Everydaylimits
66655 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 101,034
bill oxner 67,649
stxranchman 55,617
SnakeWrangler 51,673
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,451
BMD 41,064
Big Orn 37,484
Facebook
Forum Statistics
Forums45
Topics453,361
Posts6,584,496
Members66,655
Most Online19,184
Feb 5th, 2020
Print Thread
Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: HuntTXhogs] #5800405 06/22/15 06:52 PM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 5,194
M
mikei Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
M
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 5,194
Right on, HuntTXhogs! As an old Wart Hog pilot, I would say that the coordinates in which Sachal and ATN were located have been thoroughly and completely strafed. Let's try to figure out what's wrong with .288, and wish the folks well that want to continue bombing and strafing Sachal and ATN but have them do so on two separate threads. Entitle one thread: Killing Sachal; entitle the other one: Killing ATN. They can make 3/4 sorties a day to these threads and use the same ordnance until their fingers get tired. And we won't have to sort through repeated Bomb Damage Assessments that all read exactly the same.
Originally Posted By: HuntTXhogs
Do you know why this emoticon exists

offtopic

When you have fellow forum members respectfully asking you to post negative (deservedly so) comments in other threads (designated for) it would be the respectable thing to do, so that we can get

back


Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800410 06/22/15 06:54 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,972
HuntTXhogs Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,972
If you've loaded 288 firmware i highly suggest rolling back to 266 and awaiting a more stable firmware build.

I'm not at liberty to discuss why 288 was pulled but I'd hate to see anybody have an issue in the field.

Have a good day all, IM OUT

flag

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: HuntTXhogs] #5800418 06/22/15 07:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
S
s6275 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
Originally Posted By: HuntTXhogs
If you've loaded 288 firmware i highly suggest rolling back to 266 and awaiting a more stable firmware build.

I'm not at liberty to discuss why 288 was pulled but I'd hate to see anybody have an issue in the field.

Have a good day all, IM OUT

flag


cry

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800439 06/22/15 07:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 226
M
MetroCat07 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
M
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 226
LOL LOL rolleyes

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: MetroCat07] #5800445 06/22/15 07:25 PM
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,972
HuntTXhogs Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 2,972
Originally Posted By: s6275
Originally Posted By: HuntTXhogs
If you've loaded 288 firmware i highly suggest rolling back to 266 and awaiting a more stable firmware build.

I'm not at liberty to discuss why 288 was pulled but I'd hate to see anybody have an issue in the field.

Have a good day all, IM OUT

flag


cry
Originally Posted By: MetroCat07
LOL LOL rolleyes



Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800455 06/22/15 07:34 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 226
M
MetroCat07 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
M
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 226
Who's hijacking now? At least we were talking about the scope, grow up.

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800461 06/22/15 07:38 PM
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 112
T
TomH FW Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
T
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 112
I did install .288. Not sure what changed, or why they pulled it. Did not seem to fix anything for me, but by the same token did not seem to break anything further either. ?????Ben - IF you can say, is there a safety reason for me to roll back to .266? If not, I will probably just hang tight. Note, I did "shim" to zero, so am not affected by loss of zero issues.

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800472 06/22/15 07:43 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Beaubien Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Guys, some of us want to work with this scope. This thread was intended to be for discussion on a firmware build and not a discussion on how people feel about ATN.

In the other thread which IS intended for feelings about ATN and remedies, it was specifically asked that none of us who choose to work with the scope post in it.

Please give us the same respect so that we can be part of the solution and not part of the problem.

Last edited by Beaubien; 06/22/15 07:47 PM.


Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800484 06/22/15 07:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 11
B
Beltfed Offline
Light Foot
Offline
Light Foot
B
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 11
Wow I just read 6 pages(5 of which had nothing to do with .288) to learn that I'm better off doing nothing.

Someone call the AG.. lol sorry ;-)

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: Beltfed] #5800539 06/22/15 08:37 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
S
s6275 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
Originally Posted By: Beltfed
Wow I just read 6 pages(5 of which had nothing to do with .288) to learn that I'm better off doing nothing.

Someone call the AG.. lol sorry ;-)


Bro, be part of the SOLUTION, and here that means only talk about what works really well from any given firmware. Never mind that at this point there is a 50/ 50 chance that for v .288, at this point, that seems to be NOTHING...and even ATN doesn't think so.

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: mikei] #5800541 06/22/15 08:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
S
s6275 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
Originally Posted By: mikei
Right on, HuntTXhogs! As an old Wart Hog pilot, I would say that the coordinates in which Sachal and ATN were located have been thoroughly and completely strafed. Let's try to figure out what's wrong with .288, and wish the folks well that want to continue bombing and strafing Sachal and ATN but have them do so on two separate threads. Entitle one thread: Killing Sachal; entitle the other one: Killing ATN. They can make 3/4 sorties a day to these threads and use the same ordnance until their fingers get tired. And we won't have to sort through repeated Bomb Damage Assessments that all read exactly the same.


That is taking things a bit far, don't you think? The company is one thing, but an individual life? This post explains so much to me. SO MUCH.

Anyway...I managed to snag v.288, but never got around to loading it up. Evidently it is screwed up enough that people "aren't at liberty to say" what was majorly wrong. Lucky me, eh?

Now, let's all get ourselves back on over to the .266 board! .288 was just a figment of our imaginations. Whadahyahsay? walking

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800560 06/22/15 08:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Beaubien Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Lest you want your thread to denigrate to the level this one has, post over there.



Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: Beaubien] #5800572 06/22/15 08:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
S
s6275 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
Originally Posted By: Beaubien
Lest you want your thread to denigrate to the level this one has, post over there.


A threat? MY thread? Huh.

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800744 06/22/15 10:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 259
S
SachalATN Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 259
I know I am going to get a lot of heat for this but I think I should say something. First of all, everyone must understand my position. I do work for ATN and represent the company here, but I do not call all the shots. I joined the forum only for one reason - take your feedback to my company and deliver a product you all will be happy with.

I know as a user of any good, I really admire when a company joins a public forum and listens to its customer's feedback. Well I wanted to be your listening "ear" for ATN.

I have been personally attacked by few members here, and initially I understood their frustration, but then they got personal and I had to start ignoring them. There are individuals that I personally refuse to help, just because despite trying to help them their taunts and rudeness didnt subside.

As for the .288 firmware, as far as I know, this firmware was not meant to be released. Someone somewhere wasnt paying attention and put something out that was still being tested.

I would agree with members who have advised to revert back to .266. It is the current most stable firmware.

I am sorry for what some of you had to go through but believe you me, no body here is intentionally doing this. We do not have some sick conspiracy here where we enjoy seeing our customers displeased. We do mean well for our customers and are doing everything, within our capabilities and resources, to fix these issues.

Last edited by SachalATN; 06/22/15 10:25 PM.

ATN Corporation, USA
The Future of Optics
www.atncorp.com



Please note: I do not read private messages here.
Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800749 06/22/15 10:19 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Beaubien Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Thanks Sachal. I completely understand.



Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: mikei] #5800759 06/22/15 10:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,243
R
RiverRider Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 8,243
Originally Posted By: mikei
Right on, HuntTXhogs! As an old Wart Hog pilot, I would say that the coordinates in which Sachal and ATN were located have been thoroughly and completely strafed. Let's try to figure out what's wrong with .288, and wish the folks well that want to continue bombing and strafing Sachal and ATN but have them do so on two separate threads. Entitle one thread: Killing Sachal; entitle the other one: Killing ATN. They can make 3/4 sorties a day to these threads and use the same ordnance until their fingers get tired. And we won't have to sort through repeated Bomb Damage Assessments that all read exactly the same.




ROTFLMAO!


[Linked Image]

"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty."

-Augustus McRae
Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: SachalATN] #5800764 06/22/15 10:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,261
hopalong Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,261
Originally Posted By: SachalATN
I know I am going to get a lot of heat for this but I think I should say something. First of all, everyone must understand my position. I do work for ATN and represent the company here, but I do not call all the shots. I joined the forum only for one reason - take your feedback to my company and deliver a product you all will be happy with.

I know as a user of any good, I really admire when a company joins a public forum and listens to its customer's feedback. Well I wanted to be your listening "ear" for ATN.

I have been personally attacked by few members here, and initially I understood their frustration, but then they got personal and I had to start ignoring them. There are individuals that I personally refuse to help, just because despite trying to help them their taunts and rudeness didnt subside.

As for the .288 firmware, as far as I know, this firmware was not meant to be released. Someone somewhere wasnt paying attention and put something out that was still being tested.

I would agree with members who have advised to revert back to .266. It is the current most stable firmware.

I am sorry for what some of you had to go through but believe you me, no body here is intentionally doing this. We do not have some sick conspiracy here where we enjoy seeing our customers displeased. We do mean well for our customers and are doing everything, within our capabilities and resources, to fix these issues.






lake fork FISHERMANS COVE MARINA - 903 474 7479 reservations

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800788 06/22/15 10:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
S
s6275 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 255
Board profanity filters were circumvented by you, Sachal. I stated that every time you did something like that, I lost another 5 lbs. of respect for YOUR COMPANY (you made that distinction just now, not me). I got banned for a month. You stayed.

I understand that you work for the company. We all work for some company, to varying extents. However, I purchased a warranted product from yours. You originally offered help, and so long as this scope remains unmounted and uncorrected, I am going to get helped through whatever means are necessary. There is absolutely an easier path here, and ATN can still take it.

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800793 06/22/15 10:42 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,591
T
Texas buckeye Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 6,591
Let's stop this thread then if the .288 release wasn't intended to be public and wait for the next update.

I suggest any further comments be made via PM, as any further banter between people isn't productive and is simply meant to be a soap box moment. Mods please close this thread!!

Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: s6275] #5800800 06/22/15 10:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 259
S
SachalATN Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
S
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 259
Originally Posted By: s6275
Board profanity filters were circumvented by you, Sachal. I stated that every time you did something like that, I lost another 5 lbs. of respect for YOUR COMPANY (you made that distinction just now, not me). I got banned for a month. You stayed.

I understand that you work for the company. We all work for some company, to varying extents. However, I purchased a warranted product from yours. You originally offered help, and so long as this scope remains unmounted and uncorrected, I am going to get helped through whatever means are necessary. There is absolutely an easier path here, and ATN can still take it.


I am more than happy to help you, but again, when you send me emails do not use profanity or personal taunts.


ATN Corporation, USA
The Future of Optics
www.atncorp.com



Please note: I do not read private messages here.
Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800802 06/22/15 10:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 187
D
deereguy Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
D
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 187
There you go S6275...you have your out now and can put your money where your mouth is.


Happy Hunting
Bob

Disclosure: Pro Staff for Pulsar as of 8-3-2015
Pro Staff Predator Hunter Outdoors
Re: X-Sight Owners forum for the (1.8.06.288) firmware update [Re: cyberpyrot] #5800804 06/22/15 10:49 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Beaubien Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
4 weeks of peace and quiet and we are back to this.



Page 4 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2019 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3