texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Chopz, SteveMessana, elitelion, RuthMorrisonMR, FTurner90
66787 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 101,905
bill oxner 68,930
stxranchman 55,805
SnakeWrangler 52,111
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,451
BMD 41,064
Big Orn 37,484
Facebook
Forum Statistics
Forums45
Topics428,663
Posts6,450,640
Members66,787
Most Online19,184
Feb 5th, 2020
Print Thread
TPW Dove survey #5377943 10/24/14 08:32 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,731
M
Mud Offline OP
Extreme Tracker
OP Offline
Extreme Tracker
M
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,731
Do you ever fudge a bit on the numbers on the TPW dove survey? I'm a crappy shot. I know it. I don't really need them to know it too.


Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5378534 10/25/14 02:51 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,887
Sniper John Offline
gumshoe
Offline
gumshoe
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,887
Are you talking about the HIP numbers? Those numbers mean nothing. Or did you receive a survey from TPWD?

Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5378562 10/25/14 03:10 AM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,278
F
Fooshman Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
F
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,278
I speak truth, not trash.

Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5378571 10/25/14 03:14 AM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 47,472
BOBO the Clown Online Content
decoy
Online Content
decoy
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 47,472
Think some one put the Bertram in the water a little early this year


Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5378961 10/25/14 01:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,719
Dave Speer Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,719
Why would you lie on HIP or any other survey?

Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5379295 10/25/14 07:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,226
S
SpoonPlatoon Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,226
HIP is used to estimate total harvest and to find people to donate wings for the national wingbee. Why lie?


[Linked Image]
Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5379341 10/25/14 08:25 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,278
F
Fooshman Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
F
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,278
I got a snipe, rail, gallinule and coot survey in the mail for this season as well. nuts

Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5379350 10/25/14 08:35 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
R
RangerRick Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
R
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 447
I got laughed at and paw pointed by my Brittany... confused2 Only had 1 fair day outta 12 cant make the birds fly,but I can be a better shot!!


The way things should be are not often the way things are.....
Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5379445 10/25/14 10:37 PM
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,660
B
BigAL33 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,660
Are you supposed to count the ones that went down but your bird dog could never find?

Re: TPW Dove survey [Re: Mud] #5379607 10/26/14 12:48 AM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,887
Sniper John Offline
gumshoe
Offline
gumshoe
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 17,887
BigAL33,
It is not important. Just give an estimated number. The HIP numbers for each State are not used in harvest surveys. It is only used as a predictor of your current year's hunting activity and success based on the screening questions. From each State list the FWS sends secondary surveys. In the secondary survey the small group of active/very successful hunters at a high rate, the larger group of less successful hunters at a lower rate, and the very large group of hunters who rarely if ever hunt the species or species-group at a very low rate. So if your off by a few birds or a lot of birds, it makes no difference at all with the HIP numbers.

The way the screening questions categorize hunters, guys like Mudshark that intentionally give small numbers or zero are not likely to receive the survey that counts, and if they do receive a survey they are also not likely to be the kind of guys that turn it in or even open the letter. So the guys like him that intentionally give false numbers on the secondary surveys trying to discredit the survey are going to be very few and fall into the 1% allowed error allowance. He is wasting his time by doing so rather than throwing it in the trash. And if it was a secondary state dove survey that was part of a cooperative national survey they just did, the numbers again were not the main thing they were after anyway, it was hunter opinions and preferences. Especially related to non toxic shot.


Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2019 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3