I'm pulling my vari-x III 2.5-8x32 and going to a VX-R. I want the 1.25-4x20 but I am afraid I will lose low light quality. I can move up to the 2-7x33 VX-R but like the compact size of the 1.25-4.

Is the glass quality of the VX-R good enough to make up for the objective change to 20mm and still have equal or better light draw to the vari-x III?

I have the VX-R Patrol 1.25-4x20 and believe it or not it does bring in a good amount of light but at night or very low light you can't compare it to the bigger objectives. I have it for sale but if it doesn't I don't have a problem keeping it.



Hitting steel at 200 with ease, I let a few guys at the range shoot behind it and they all had positive things to say about good luck on your choice.

Excuse the chit chat

Thanks for the info and video. I was actually eyeballing yours in the classifieds but decided it was not right for my application but an excellent deal. Given your opinion on low light use I think I will go with the 2-7x33. This will be used for hunting in low light every time it's out. Thanks again.

Not a problem I got my eyes on the vortex 2.5-10x32, perfect at night behind the thermal and good for reaching out during the day.

I have one and its a nice scope if FFP works for you. As far as the OP's concern good glass trumps objective size to a degree. The older VariIII were not very good in low light.... dismal is the word that comes to mind. The newer Leupold's are better for sure.