Texas Hunting Forum

license question

Posted By: LUguy08

license question - 11/21/16 02:48 AM

My wife wants to tag along with me on a hunt to see what it is like. She does not have a license and is not going to be hunting or helping. Just sitting and watching. Does she need to have a licesne or anything to just watch and keep me company? Been trying to find a clear answer.
Posted By: Jeff Elder

Re: license question - 11/21/16 02:58 AM

P M sent
Posted By: Duck_Hunter

Re: license question - 11/21/16 03:00 PM

I'm interested in this answer too. My wife doesn't want to hunt, but she has offered to come and help handle our dog. I'm guessing working a dog would be considered hunting, too, even if the law says it's ok to be in the blind as a non-shooter.
Posted By: N.Tx

Re: license question - 11/21/16 11:18 PM

Jeff I'd also like your take on this. I've done some research but would like to confirm.

Thank!
Posted By: ken starling

Re: license question - 11/21/16 11:40 PM

We had a scenario last year where a friend was going to go and just call for my son and his buddy. The guy did not want to buy a Type 2 to hunt, we called the local game warden and was told if he was not hunting then that would be fine. I would recommend to not have a back up gun in your possession.

I would call the local game warden instead of listening to all of us. Just a piece of mind.
Posted By: Jeff Elder

Re: license question - 11/21/16 11:55 PM

Originally Posted By: E.TX.JMart
Jeff I'd also like your take on this. I've done some research but would like to confirm.

Thank!


PM sent
Posted By: 68rustbucket

Re: license question - 11/22/16 12:26 AM

I took my wife with me quail hunting last weekend. I told her we'd stop and get her a license. She insisted she didn't need one because she wasn't hunting, just taking pictures. I didn't want any hassle if we ran into a warden, so we stopped and got her a license. No big deal
Posted By: Duck_Hunter

Re: license question - 11/22/16 12:57 AM

Originally Posted By: Jeff Elder
Originally Posted By: E.TX.JMart
Jeff I'd also like your take on this. I've done some research but would like to confirm.

Thank!


PM sent


The FAQ on your website says non-shooters are required to have a license and duck stamp. Was this learned the hard way or is it interpretation? Genuinely interested. You can send me a PM too, if you like.
Posted By: Dave Speer

Re: license question - 11/22/16 04:11 AM

I haven't read any regs but I think no way a non hunter needs a license. You don't need a license to fish if you're in a boat and someone else is fishing. You don't need a driver's license to ride in a car. I think some or all of APH land is access ONLY by license-- regardless of activity, that's different. If you're hunting a public lake, river, or bay, or on private land, she doesn't need one.
Posted By: Duck_Hunter

Re: license question - 11/22/16 04:18 AM

Originally Posted By: Dave Speer
I haven't read any regs but I think no way a non hunter needs a license. You don't need a license to fish if you're in a boat and someone else is fishing. You don't need a driver's license to ride in a car. I think some or all of APH land is access ONLY by license-- regardless of activity, that's different. If you're hunting a public lake, river, or bay, or on private land, she doesn't need one.


Totally agree, but I'm sure it's been addressed in the field before and I can see it going both ways, even though I would disagree with non-hunters needing a license.
Posted By: krmitchell

Re: license question - 11/22/16 04:23 AM

No, not in any circumstance does a non-hunter need a license if they truly aren't hunting. There is no two ways about it. Not hunting, not fishing, no license needed. I do agree that I wouldn't have an extra shotgun behind them, but in the absence of them picking it up and shooting it, there is no violation. It is nonsense to think you need to buy your spouse a license because they are watching you hunt.

If a GW says your spouse without a gun is hunting, then I would expect to have a two man limit in my possession and it be legal, which we all know isn't going to happen.
Posted By: Pintail711

Re: license question - 11/23/16 11:45 PM

Originally Posted By: rexmitchell
No, not in any circumstance does a non-hunter need a license if they truly aren't hunting. There is no two ways about it. Not hunting, not fishing, no license needed. I do agree that I wouldn't have an extra shotgun behind them, but in the absence of them picking it up and shooting it, there is no violation. It is nonsense to think you need to buy your spouse a license because they are watching you hunt.

If a GW says your spouse without a gun is hunting, then I would expect to have a two man limit in my possession and it be legal, which we all know isn't going to happen.


X2.... that's why it's called a Hunting or Fishing license. Plus you don't have to have a type 2 unless you are hunting. If you want to go scout, you do not have to have a type 2 permit...but you better not have a gun with you that can be a legal means of taking an animal. I've got a friend of mine that is a GW and I asked him about it
Posted By: Sniper John

Re: license question - 11/24/16 12:10 AM

Originally Posted By: Pintail711

X2.... that's why it's called a Hunting or Fishing license. Plus you don't have to have a type 2 unless you are hunting. If you want to go scout, you do not have to have a type 2 permit...but you better not have a gun with you that can be a legal means of taking an animal. I've got a friend of mine that is a GW and I asked him about it


If by type 2, your talking about the now called APH permit, non hunters or hunters wanting to scout before buying an APH permit for most areas still need at least the LPU permit.
"A $12 Limited Public Use (LPU) Permit provides access to the same areas as the APH at a reduced cost for fishing, hiking, camping, bird watching, picnicking, wildlife viewing and equestrian use"

Another wrench in the works if hunting a WMA or APH unit is the non hunter would be required to wear hunter orange. Only the licensed hunter would be exempt from the requirement for hunting migratory birds.
"Notice: to archery hunters and recreational users: You must wear hunter orange during daylight hours at any time when firearm hunting for any species is authorized on the unit."

As for the hunting license, the person tagging along and not hunting of course does not need a license. But know the moment a GW sees them holding a shotgun, the assumption will be that they are hunting, so just use some common sense.
Posted By: Dave Speer

Re: license question - 11/24/16 07:11 AM

I always figured the only reason people had non-hunters buy a license was to attempt to kill over the limit laugh Sorry to see people buying licenses that don't need them.
Posted By: 68rustbucket

Re: license question - 11/24/16 02:03 PM

Another reason to get the wife a license, She'll already have a license next time we go fishing. Yes I did have her get a super combo. And she will be holding a fishing rod
Posted By: barndoor

Re: license question - 11/24/16 02:40 PM

Originally Posted By: LUguy08
My wife wants to tag along with me on a hunt to see what it is like. She does not have a license and is not going to be hunting or helping. Just sitting and watching. Does she need to have a licesne or anything to just watch and keep me company? Been trying to find a clear answer.


How much is the license? Can you benefit more from obtaining the license. If the license is a small nominal fee and you can get more that you money out of it, then do it. For example, you can now get the double the limit. If your wife can shoot, I would prefer she hold a gun and shoot snakes. A trip to the ER is cheaper than a hunting license.
Posted By: Dave Speer

Re: license question - 11/24/16 03:47 PM

Originally Posted By: barndoor
Originally Posted By: LUguy08
My wife wants to tag along with me on a hunt to see what it is like. She does not have a license and is not going to be hunting or helping. Just sitting and watching. Does she need to have a licesne or anything to just watch and keep me company? Been trying to find a clear answer.


If the license is a small nominal fee and you can get more that you money out of it, then do it. For example, you can now get the double the limit.


Hahaha yup there it is right there...
Posted By: shea.mcphail

Re: license question - 11/24/16 04:11 PM

Originally Posted By: barndoor
Originally Posted By: LUguy08
My wife wants to tag along with me on a hunt to see what it is like. She does not have a license and is not going to be hunting or helping. Just sitting and watching. Does she need to have a licesne or anything to just watch and keep me company? Been trying to find a clear answer.


How much is the license? Can you benefit more from obtaining the license. If the license is a small nominal fee and you can get more that you money out of it, then do it. For example, you can now get the double the limit. If your wife can shoot, I would prefer she hold a gun and shoot snakes. A trip to the ER is cheaper than a hunting license.


Playing with fire..
Posted By: scalebuster

Re: license question - 11/24/16 05:06 PM

Originally Posted By: 68rustbucket
I took my wife with me quail hunting last weekend. I told her we'd stop and get her a license. She insisted she didn't need one because she wasn't hunting, just taking pictures. I didn't want any hassle if we ran into a warden, so we stopped and got her a license. No big deal


That and you can now kill 30 birds.
Posted By: 68rustbucket

Re: license question - 11/24/16 07:09 PM

Heck,
I've never killed 1 limit, so 2 is out of the question.
Posted By: Pintail711

Re: license question - 11/24/16 07:27 PM

Originally Posted By: Sniper John
Originally Posted By: Pintail711

X2.... that's why it's called a Hunting or Fishing license. Plus you don't have to have a type 2 unless you are hunting. If you want to go scout, you do not have to have a type 2 permit...but you better not have a gun with you that can be a legal means of taking an animal. I've got a friend of mine that is a GW and I asked him about it


If by type 2, your talking about the now called APH permit, non hunters or hunters wanting to scout before buying an APH permit for most areas still need at least the LPU permit.
"A $12 Limited Public Use (LPU) Permit provides access to the same areas as the APH at a reduced cost for fishing, hiking, camping, bird watching, picnicking, wildlife viewing and equestrian use"

Another wrench in the works if hunting a WMA or APH unit is the non hunter would be required to wear hunter orange. Only the licensed hunter would be exempt from the requirement for hunting migratory birds.
"Notice: to archery hunters and recreational users: You must wear hunter orange during daylight hours at any time when firearm hunting for any species is authorized on the unit."

As for the hunting license, the person tagging along and not hunting of course does not need a license. But know the moment a GW sees them holding a shotgun, the assumption will be that they are hunting, so just use some common sense.


I've never been on a WMA or Public Hunting Land without other hunters. The OP is the only person I've heard of. Type 2 is what I've always heard and called WMA's or APH land. The Limited Access Permit is something I've never heard of. I'm not in any means saying you are wrong. If that's the case, then the GW needs to enforce it.
© 2024 Texas Hunting Forum