The Photon is going to be the cheapest thing that will work ok, next would be the pulsar digitals and the X sight. Will they be 3rd gen or thermal good no not even close unless its a full moon but they will work better than lights white/red/green/rainbow whatever. People will argue till they are blue in the face that lights do not scare hogs, digital is as good as 3rd gen, ect the best thing you can do is test it out for yourself either by finding someone that has it or by renting some from a place like ultimate night vision. Hogs can see lights, hogs can see IR illuminators, 3rd gen NV is better in dark situations and thermal is the best, I can say this because I have used and tested them all. But what ultimately works best for you and your wallet and brings you success and fun is all that really matters.
Very well said.The Photon is at the lower limit of what is usable in my opinion. The price relative to the competition is the lowest as far as I know. The only other option that would be less is to make something yourself, but that has it's own inherent drawbacks and limitations.
The Photon is low cost compared to the competition, but look at it in the context of what it costs to make one yourself or against compact digital video recorders. Compare digital recorders, cameras, and such with their much better performance, image quality, technology and functionality (as a camera) and their lower cost and it is plain to see that the Photon XT is expensive relative to performance (what you actually get).
Remember that you will also need to price in a mount for the scope (as low as $30 up to how much you want to spend), possibly the doubler ($200 from UNV), and IR Illuminator ($30 to $50 depending on the model T20 to T67 [the source is given in my thread in optics sub forum] or $195 for a T20 from UNV) and some sort of mounting solution for that. To get to the point where it is usable in large fields it will nickle and dime you up to around $1,000.
Better to go into it with your eyes wide open and realistic expectations than the expectation that these are some wonder NV. The performance is marginal, but in my opinion the form factor (ease of use) is good.
This video captures my albeit limited experience with Photon XT quite well. With current digital imagery technology and it's ever decreasing cost, there is much more potential for better digital products at lower price points, but at the end of the day a seller will charge what the market will pay...
Same guy as posted earlier, only without the doubler at 60 yards. A more honest representation of a stock Photon XT without the doubler ("an unbiased video" - LOL).
In the video of the Photon XT with a doubler you will also notice how much the field of view is reduced when using the doubler... It provides a better image at the cost of a significant reduction in the FOV. The FOV for me is important to be able to pick up targets for follow up shots once they are on the run. So there is no free lunch...