Posted By: Flags
I have a question: - 01/10/16 04:28 PM
I recently moved to TX after retiring from the Navy. Prior to this I was a lifelong CO resident but just switched my residency permanently to TX. So next year I'll be doing my hunting here instead of CO and I've been familiarizing myself with the regs. But I do have a question:
Can anyone explain the rationale that prevents a hunter from fully boning a deer in the field and why is a hunter required to bring the entire head home? In my native CO ( and other states in the Rockies) it is legal to bone a deer or elk and leave the bones for the scavengers. To prove evidence of sex you could leave either a nut or a tit attached to a piece of the carcass and if there were antler restrictions you had to bring the rack out but not the whole head. Even if you plan on mounting a head, you don't need the whole thing, just the cape and the antlers on a small piece of skull.
Bringing the bones and the head out means that a hunter has to find a way to properly dispose of them later. Not a big deal if you live in the country but it is a concern if you live in a major city. Since coyotes etc... also have to eat, why not leave the bones for them? I understand different states have different rules and I respect that but I really don't understand the mindset of this law and hopefully one of you can explain it to me.
Can anyone explain the rationale that prevents a hunter from fully boning a deer in the field and why is a hunter required to bring the entire head home? In my native CO ( and other states in the Rockies) it is legal to bone a deer or elk and leave the bones for the scavengers. To prove evidence of sex you could leave either a nut or a tit attached to a piece of the carcass and if there were antler restrictions you had to bring the rack out but not the whole head. Even if you plan on mounting a head, you don't need the whole thing, just the cape and the antlers on a small piece of skull.
Bringing the bones and the head out means that a hunter has to find a way to properly dispose of them later. Not a big deal if you live in the country but it is a concern if you live in a major city. Since coyotes etc... also have to eat, why not leave the bones for them? I understand different states have different rules and I respect that but I really don't understand the mindset of this law and hopefully one of you can explain it to me.