Texas Hunting Forum

Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years

Posted By: tlk

Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 04:36 PM

OFFICIAL BOONE AND CROCKETT BOOK DEER BY COUNTY PAST 30 YEARS
TYPICAL

1. Maverick 50
2. Webb 37
3. Dimmit 34
4. La Salle 33
5. Kleberg 19

NON TYPICAL

1. Maverick 19
2. La Salle 10
3. Dimmit 9
4. Grayson 7
5. Webb 7

TOTAL NON TYPICAL AND TYPICAL

1. Maverick 69
2. Webb 44
3. Dimmit and La Salle 43 each
Posted By: BuffaloSpringsRD

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 04:52 PM

Interesting. I always thought B&C for typical was 172" bur this is what the website says:

typical whitetail deer
160 170
non-typical whitetail deer
185 195
Posted By: jshouse

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 04:57 PM

wonder how high grayson would be if rifles were allowed.
Posted By: fouzman

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 04:58 PM

Buffalo, 170 and 195 net are the minimum scores for entry into the All Time record book. 160 and 185 nets are recognized by B&C in their annual awards, but they do not make "the book".
Posted By: redchevy

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 05:08 PM

Those numbers seem low, not saying your wrong at all, but I would have expect quite a few more in 30 years period.

Anybody have an idea of what percentage the reported ones make up of what is actually killed?
Posted By: redchevy

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 05:08 PM

Originally Posted By: jshouse
wonder how high grayson would be if rifles were allowed.


I wonder how the number would be different after 10 years of gun hunting popcorn
Posted By: Leonardo

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 05:34 PM

Originally Posted By: redchevy
Those numbers seem low, not saying your wrong at all, but I would have expect quite a few more in 30 years period.

Anybody have an idea of what percentage the reported ones make up of what is actually killed?


Most want the jacket I would think!
Posted By: Leonardo

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 05:34 PM

Originally Posted By: Leonardo
Originally Posted By: redchevy
Those numbers seem low, not saying your wrong at all, but I would have expect quite a few more in 30 years period.

Anybody have an idea of what percentage the reported ones make up of what is actually killed?


Most want the jacket I would think!


Guess that's not actually the B&C but the contest.
Posted By: tlk

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 06:30 PM

Originally Posted By: redchevy
Those numbers seem low, not saying your wrong at all, but I would have expect quite a few more in 30 years period.

Anybody have an idea of what percentage the reported ones make up of what is actually killed?


I only listed the top 5 counties - there are a number more listed when you include all Texas Counties.

These are straight out of the records provided by B&C. Many bucks gross the required score but very few net book.

I can get any time frame. Past ten years, etc.

To qualify it is a pretty solid process. Drying period and then an official B&C scorer has to measure and turn in the score sheets to B&C. Hunter has to complete paperwork verifying where killed, etc.
Posted By: tlk

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 06:31 PM

Originally Posted By: fouzman
Buffalo, 170 and 195 net are the minimum scores for entry into the All Time record book. 160 and 185 nets are recognized by B&C in their annual awards, but they do not make "the book".



THIS^^
Posted By: BuffaloSpringsRD

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 06:49 PM

Originally Posted By: tlk
Originally Posted By: fouzman
Buffalo, 170 and 195 net are the minimum scores for entry into the All Time record book. 160 and 185 nets are recognized by B&C in their annual awards, but they do not make "the book".



THIS^^


Thanks for the verfication. I am also shocked the Typical numbers are so much higher than the nontypical
Posted By: M16

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 06:56 PM

Here's a picture of mine from 2004. Maverick County. 182 gross 170 5/8 net.


Posted By: jshouse

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 06:58 PM

Originally Posted By: BuffaloSpringsRD
Originally Posted By: tlk
Originally Posted By: fouzman
Buffalo, 170 and 195 net are the minimum scores for entry into the All Time record book. 160 and 185 nets are recognized by B&C in their annual awards, but they do not make "the book".



THIS^^


Thanks for the verfication. I am also shocked the Typical numbers are so much higher than the nontypical


its the other way around, he mislabeled them on this thread...
Posted By: tlk

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 07:23 PM

Originally Posted By: jshouse
Originally Posted By: BuffaloSpringsRD
Originally Posted By: tlk
Originally Posted By: fouzman
Buffalo, 170 and 195 net are the minimum scores for entry into the All Time record book. 160 and 185 nets are recognized by B&C in their annual awards, but they do not make "the book".



THIS^^


Thanks for the verfication. I am also shocked the Typical numbers are so much higher than the nontypical


its the other way around, he mislabeled them on this thread...

I did on the other thread - I corrected it - these numbers are correct
Posted By: tlk

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 07:26 PM

Originally Posted By: M16
Here's a picture of mine from 2004. Maverick County. 182 gross 170 5/8 net.




Great deer!
Posted By: SouthTXhunter07

Re: Boone and Crockett book entries by county past 30 years - 12/09/15 07:37 PM

that looks like a young deer, nice tho!
© 2024 Texas Hunting Forum