Texas Hunting Forum

Blaze pink legislation

Posted By: Gary Olson

Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 01:17 PM

Did you know Blaze Pink is now a legal alternative to Blaze Orange in Wisconsin? Legislation has been introduced in other states also.



Does anyone think this will really attract more women to hunting?

Gary
Posted By: Double Naught Spy

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 01:25 PM

Is that what it is marketed to be doing?
Posted By: Western

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 01:39 PM

May draw more men to the sport peep

I honestly don't know if woman hunters, would associate the color any different.
Posted By: GimmeABuck

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 02:11 PM

I enjoy my pink camo shirts from Wally as much as the next girl, but I think it's pretty silly. I think women who love to hunt or are genuinely interested in taking it up aren't going to give a damn about orange vs. pink. If she's that worried about how she looks in the field, she isn't that into actually going hunting. Just my two cents.
Posted By: Mr. T.

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 02:20 PM

I will make my wife wear blaze orange when she is in the woods. It's about being safe not about walking down a fashion runway.
Posted By: syncerus

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 03:17 PM

I think any of the fluorescent colors (yellow, orange, pink, etc.) are probably equally safe. If its safe and it makes a segment of the hunting public happy then I'm all for it.
Posted By: Sneaky

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 03:23 PM

Originally Posted By: Mr. T.
I will make my wife wear blaze orange when she is in the woods. It's about being safe not about walking down a fashion runway.


I recall reading something years ago that stated blaze pink was actually more visible than orange. I doubt it makes much difference, either way.
Posted By: EddieWalker

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 03:34 PM

I'm all for anything that encourages more people to get out in the woods and have fun. If pink camo makes it more fun for you, then that's awesome. I'm still an orange vest kind of guy that's probably 30 years old without any need for anything newer or fancier.
Posted By: Double Naught Spy

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 03:56 PM

This is interesting, pink is not a color readily seen by red-green colorblind people.

http://www.twincities.com/2015/05/30/hunter-blaze-pink-could-pose-problems-for-the-color-blind/
Posted By: poisonivie

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 04:31 PM

Quote:
Texas Blaze Orange Laws

Man and Boy Hunting
All persons on public hunting lands (state, national forests, and grasslands) during daylight hours when hunting with firearms is permitted must wear at least 400 square inches of hunter orange material with orange headgear, and at least 144 square inches appearing on both chest and back.


The one pictured does not meet the criteria because of the camo pattern. Most states have minimum unbroken requirements.
Posted By: Double Naught Spy

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 05/30/16 06:26 PM

Quote:
The one pictured does not meet the criteria because of the camo pattern. Most states have minimum unbroken requirements.


It would meet the requirements for Wisconsin, which is where the law is being considered.
It would for Texas, as noted. http://tpwd.texas.gov/education/hunter-education/blaze-orange-laws


The only states I find that require unbroken blaze or flourescent orange are Rhode Island, Maine, Maryland, Kentucky South Carolina, and Mississippi.
http://www.examiner.com/article/reqirements-for-blaze-hunter-or-fluorescent-orange
http://www.tbcpress.com/A14-1251-3.html
https://books.google.com/books?id=yMV3nz...lid&f=false

Heck, a bunch of states just strongly suggest orange be worn, LOL.

Posted By: fr3db3ar

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/04/16 10:00 PM

It would meet it in Michigan as well. I would imagine it would be OK anywhere blaze camo is allowed.
Posted By: Aggieman775

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/05/16 12:32 AM

Originally Posted By: Double Naught Spy
Quote:
The one pictured does not meet the criteria because of the camo pattern. Most states have minimum unbroken requirements.


It would meet the requirements for Wisconsin, which is where the law is being considered.
It would for Texas, as noted. http://tpwd.texas.gov/education/hunter-education/blaze-orange-laws


The only states I find that require unbroken blaze or flourescent orange are Rhode Island, Maine, Maryland, Kentucky South Carolina, and Mississippi.
http://www.examiner.com/article/reqirements-for-blaze-hunter-or-fluorescent-orange

http://www.tbcpress.com/A14-1251-3.html
https://books.google.com/books?id=yMV3nz...lid&f=false

Heck, a bunch of states just strongly suggest orange be worn, LOL.




Missouri is another one that require unbroken orange
Posted By: Ramsey

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/05/16 04:28 AM

I like women hunters
Posted By: BOBO the Clown

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/06/16 12:47 AM

My wife hates shrink it and pink it in hunting appeal

Firstlite did it right with thier new women's hunting line. Take note they did their research.
Posted By: nak

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/08/16 04:02 AM

My wife shoots Sporting Clays with a camo pink Beretta 12g, while wearing camo pink shorts and a matching cap.

[img]https://flic.kr/p/2MTWN7[/img]

If she was going to deer hunt, it would be in Blaze Pink .
Posted By: Wacm

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/09/16 05:15 AM

Maybe it's not for women but for homosexual hunters. You know everyone has to recognized these days.
Posted By: texasgal

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/09/16 10:27 AM

Not a color that is in my closet, camo or otherwise.
Posted By: Double Naught Spy

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/09/16 12:54 PM

Quote:
Missouri is another one that require unbroken orange


Sure enough! So we are up to 7 states...still a long ways from "most states" requiring it.
Posted By: Theringworm

Re: Blaze pink legislation - 06/09/16 01:20 PM

Originally Posted By: Double Naught Spy
Quote:
Missouri is another one that require unbroken orange


Sure enough! So we are up to 7 states...still a long ways from "most states" requiring it.


If you are making a list, add to it Colorado. It must be an unbroken pattern as well there.
© 2024 Texas Hunting Forum