Forums46
Topics537,811
Posts9,729,397
Members87,042
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Ammo cost .223 vs 5.56 question
#5576314
02/01/15 04:49 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,693
grout-scout
OP
Extreme Tracker
|
OP
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,693 |
Why is the 5.56 half the price of .223? Is it the FMJ that makes it so much cheaper?
|
|
|
Re: Ammo cost .223 vs 5.56 question
[Re: grout-scout]
#5576331
02/01/15 04:57 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,633
DStroud
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,633 |
Yep that and be aware that some has steel cases and also polymer cases.
"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."
Jack O'Connor 1963
|
|
|
Re: Ammo cost .223 vs 5.56 question
[Re: grout-scout]
#5576375
02/01/15 05:21 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,693
grout-scout
OP
Extreme Tracker
|
OP
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,693 |
So in a bolt action 5.56, should I just use the .223 or are there certain brands of 5.56 that are ok?
Sorry, new gun to me and trying to learn the difference. I know you can use a .223 in a 5.56 and you can't do it the opposite way but I cant find any other info about the differences (casing, tips & such)
Thanks
|
|
|
Re: Ammo cost .223 vs 5.56 question
[Re: grout-scout]
#5576401
02/01/15 05:42 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 26,548
JCB
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 26,548 |
Sorry, new gun to me and trying to learn the difference. I know you can use a .223 in a 5.56 and you can't do it the opposite way but I cant find any other info about the differences (casing, tips & such)
Thanks
The main difference is the pressure in which the 5.56 operates at. Its higher than that of the 223. Main reason the 5.56 is cheaper with all things being equal is that the 5.56 is super mass produced.
|
|
|
Re: Ammo cost .223 vs 5.56 question
[Re: grout-scout]
#5576487
02/01/15 06:32 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,633
DStroud
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,633 |
Talk about a can of worms the old 223 vs 5.56 is about as wormy as it gets. They are the same pressure wise and dimensionally although the NATO pressure specs are measured different. There is a difference in the specs on the actual chambering(reamer spec)with a slight change of the leade. Since no one ever wins this debate and the Wive's tale continues thanks to lawyers from the manufacturers I will just say this.
First find me anywhere anyone who has ever had an actual problem shooting 5.56 in a .223...google it whatever I have not heard of one instance and I know literally thousands and thousands of rounds of 5.56 are fired thru .223's every year by folks who have no idea which chambering they even have.
Next I would use Hornady's Superformance ammo as an example. A 53gr Bullet running 3500fps( I have chrono'd it several times) is hard to duplicate unless you run max loads...hotter than most manuals say 5.56 is supposed to be loaded. It would only be a guess of course but I bet it is loaded to higher pressures than most 5.56 is.
"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."
Jack O'Connor 1963
|
|
|
Re: Ammo cost .223 vs 5.56 question
[Re: grout-scout]
#5576508
02/01/15 06:44 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
Toxarch
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062 |
Good read on the differences: http://www.luckygunner.com/labs/5-56-vs-223/As for the cost, 5.56 is a military round and often fmj. So it's produced in bulk for military contracts and also sold to the public. .223 is a SAAMI standardized round and not made in large quantities like 5.56 is.
It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.
� Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
|
Re: Ammo cost .223 vs 5.56 question
[Re: grout-scout]
#5576510
02/01/15 06:45 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,518
RiverRider
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,518 |
Ammo for the 5.56 NATO originally was limited to the same pressures as SAAMI .223 Remington, but there was an allowed increase of about 3000 psi back in 1999 and I believe is was applicable to M855. Beware of loading data that gives the green light to 62000 psi. Here is how it was to be done in 1984. I have a copy of a 1999 document which indicates the pressure limit was upped to 58700 psi average, but I cannot find a link to it. M855A1 is said to be loaded hotter but I have found no specification documents on it and it may be that it is still classified. In addition to all the positive hoopla that I have read about the A1 round, it has also been said that the military is experiencing longevity problems with rifles firing the M855A1 round. I have not looked into the question for about eight months so there may be newer info out there. Regardless, I am sure that many of us are loading what we intend to be .223 Remington ammo beyond the 55000 psi spec. We have no way of knowing. If the intent is to load to 5.56 NATO spec, it would be foolish, IMO, to strive for 62000 psi. That 62000 number is lifted out of a European spec for 5.56 NATO ammunition that is developed and tested using an entirely different measurement method.
"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty." -Augustus McRae
|
|
|
Re: Ammo cost .223 vs 5.56 question
[Re: grout-scout]
#5576765
02/01/15 09:20 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,693
grout-scout
OP
Extreme Tracker
|
OP
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,693 |
Thanks fellas, so I'll just buy a few boxes of each and see which one shoots the best.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|