texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Josh-04512, dblmikeusa1, Hog-Pro, 4Notch, Niknoc76
72042 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,518
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,855
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,812
Posts9,729,417
Members87,042
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7060485 01/31/18 08:46 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
T
tenyearsgone Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
Still doesn’t need it on a 6.8. Buy a better suited scope.

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: tenyearsgone] #7060495 01/31/18 08:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
T
TFF Caribou Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
Still doesn’t need it.


Just like you don’t need that mount, yet, here we are. You both have things, and you both like them. /thread


The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: TFF Caribou] #7060499 01/31/18 08:51 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
T
tenyearsgone Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
Originally Posted By: Tff caribou
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
Still doesn’t need it.


Just like you don’t need that mount, yet, here we are. You both have things, and you both like them. /thread


Mount isn’t hurting my shooting. You can’t win, because I have posted facts.

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: tenyearsgone] #7060517 01/31/18 08:57 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
S
SapperTitan Offline
Taking Requests
Offline
Taking Requests
S
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
Originally Posted By: Tff caribou
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
Still doesn’t need it.


Just like you don’t need that mount, yet, here we are. You both have things, and you both like them. /thread


Mount isn’t hurting my shooting. You can’t win, because I have posted facts.
you have posted an opinion and one that is wrong at that but good try.

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7060524 01/31/18 09:02 PM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
T
tenyearsgone Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
Go read the article.

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: tenyearsgone] #7060660 01/31/18 10:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
S
SapperTitan Offline
Taking Requests
Offline
Taking Requests
S
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
Go read the article.
I didn't see any links to an article

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: tenyearsgone] #7060716 01/31/18 10:40 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,164
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,164
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
JG,

I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all.


Man sized targets are huge.

I have shot against Fort Sill Army snipers. Those were not the optics they were using. And they said all of us were nuts. Small targets, far away, lots of wind. They finished in the middle of 120 shooters.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: tenyearsgone] #7060742 01/31/18 11:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 915
H
hdfireman Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
H
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 915
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone


Here’s one I quickly pulled up. Quite a bit of others and my personal experience. I own a 6.8. It’s not a long range rifle.

https://www.buckmasters.com/Magazines/GunHunter/Articles/ID/196/Are-You-Using-Too-Much-Scope


Article is an opinion and not fact. There are no FACTS out there that list a certain magnification range for calibers. It is based on preference of the shooter. Some people like more mag than others and some like less. Therefore it is not the wrong scope for that gun if the shooter wants it.

Last edited by hdfireman; 01/31/18 11:09 PM.

[Linked Image]
07 FFL
eric@blackstonearms.com
214-945-5520
The 6.8 is the #1 choice for hunting deer and hogs in an AR15
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7060752 01/31/18 11:15 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,805
M
MO Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
M
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,805
This thread has made me smile, smile
why get so worked up over someone else's rifle, He is not asking you to shoot it.

Chickenman--

nice rifle, I can make you a good deal on a Leupold mark 4 CQ/T , then everyone can sleep at
night

MO



MY BACKYARD , 20,000 ACRES , NO MOWING smile


Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7060864 02/01/18 12:24 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,037
V
Vern1 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
V
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,037
I really like the wood furniture.
It's not just another cookie cutter AR.
Go shoot it and have fun with it.

Not a single one of the 300+ pigs I've killed with my 6.8s has ever said anything about using too much magnification.


Cheers,
Vern1
Texans since The Old 300 in 1824
NRA Lifetime Member
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Payne] #7060872 02/01/18 12:30 AM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 23,631
Payne Offline
Cat Herder
Offline
Cat Herder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 23,631
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
Originally Posted By: Payne
That's the great thing about being a Texan, Freedom. OP never said it was a long range rifle, he can do whatever he wants with his gun.


Then he has the wrong scope on it.


No he doesn't, just because you have an opinion doesn't make it a fact.


[Linked Image]
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7060897 02/01/18 12:44 AM
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,930
ETexas Hunter Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,930
what a clown

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: ETexas Hunter] #7060943 02/01/18 01:20 AM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 81
P
pdog2062 Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
P
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 81
Yep it’s time for the winter urinary olympics


Y,all hang on I'm gonna drive closer
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7060959 02/01/18 01:32 AM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,658
D
Dustnsand Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,658
People also don’t need more than one gun, having multiple is dumb and a dangerous arsenal. I’m sure I could find tons of articles about that.

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: ETexas Hunter] #7060974 02/01/18 01:42 AM
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 551
K
KK30RAR Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
K
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 551
Originally Posted By: ETexas Hunter
what a clown
he's just another person that knows best for everyone and will argue it to the end there’s one in every crowd


Pulsar xq50 trail
Pulsar xq30f Helion
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7061094 02/01/18 03:02 AM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,453
B
Big Fitz Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
B
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,453
Ah chit, no sense in trying to debate one's preferences. How about we all just agree that I am the best looking guy on THF? banana2

Otherwise troll


Originally Posted by onlysmith&wesson
I was wrong...on anything technical.

Originally Posted by Sailor
Fitz............. is right, ya know............
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7061946 02/01/18 08:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
T
Toxarch Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
That article was garbage. One person's opinion trying to justify low power scopes based on "what if".
For example:
Quote:
Crowd the eyepiece, and you could wind up with a “shooter’s eyebrow.”


He seems to think that everyone should be using 4x scopes with 1" tubes on all rifles because it is easier to find a target with a wide field of view, it "gave a clearer view of my target (which has become increasingly important to aging eyes) and allowed me to place my shots with greater precision", and it is lighter to carry. He also thinks the bigger the round, the smaller the scope should be.

Sorry, but nobody should be reading that article and using it for suggestions.


It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.

� Dwight D. Eisenhower
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: TFF Caribou] #7062138 02/01/18 10:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568
G
garyrapp55 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
G
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted By: Tff caribou
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
JG,

I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all.


Opinions are rarely wrong or right. If somebody is happy with their build and it is doing what they want it to, then it’s not wrong, it’s just different than yours.

My new 10/22 build will have a 4-12x40 on it. It’s way more scope than most people use on a 22. I intend for this rifle to shoot tiny little groups at 75-100 yards. I want the magnification so I can see the dime sized dots I want to shoot at.


I also have a 10/22. I shoot pieces of paper, cans, and turtles with it. I use a Nikon 4x fixed. A 4x12 is a ridiculously high powered scope for rimfire. Your build is all wrong. I have owned and modified 1 10/22 and I know what is best for you. Your 4x12 on a 10/22 is too cumbersome to sit on bags. Please revise your build.

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: garyrapp55] #7062144 02/01/18 10:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
T
TFF Caribou Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
Originally Posted By: garyrapp55
Originally Posted By: Tff caribou
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
JG,

I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all.


Opinions are rarely wrong or right. If somebody is happy with their build and it is doing what they want it to, then it’s not wrong, it’s just different than yours.

My new 10/22 build will have a 4-12x40 on it. It’s way more scope than most people use on a 22. I intend for this rifle to shoot tiny little groups at 75-100 yards. I want the magnification so I can see the dime sized dots I want to shoot at.


I also have a 10/22. I shoot pieces of paper, cans, and turtles with it. I use a Nikon 4x fixed. A 4x12 is a ridiculously high powered scope for rimfire. Your build is all wrong. I have owned and modified 1 10/22 and I know what is best for you. Your 4x12 on a 10/22 is too cumbersome to sit on bags. Please revise your build.


You had me going for a second there.


The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7062149 02/01/18 10:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568
G
garyrapp55 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
G
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568
I was hoping to

Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7062158 02/01/18 10:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,601
C
chalet Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
C
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,601
[censored], doesn't make me any difference. 4x or 24x I can earhole a pig out to 400 yds with my AR. I only shoot 5.56 though because .223 won't reach that far.


Shoot. Eat. Repeat.
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: garyrapp55] #7062672 02/02/18 09:04 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
T
Toxarch Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
Originally Posted By: garyrapp55
Originally Posted By: Tff caribou
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
JG,

I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all.


Opinions are rarely wrong or right. If somebody is happy with their build and it is doing what they want it to, then it’s not wrong, it’s just different than yours.

My new 10/22 build will have a 4-12x40 on it. It’s way more scope than most people use on a 22. I intend for this rifle to shoot tiny little groups at 75-100 yards. I want the magnification so I can see the dime sized dots I want to shoot at.


I also have a 10/22. I shoot pieces of paper, cans, and turtles with it. I use a Nikon 4x fixed. A 4x12 is a ridiculously high powered scope for rimfire. Your build is all wrong. I have owned and modified 1 10/22 and I know what is best for you. Your 4x12 on a 10/22 is too cumbersome to sit on bags. Please revise your build.


But if you read that article, the ace shooter with bad eyes (he says that) recommends going with smaller scopes with less zoom as you increase in caliber and recoil. He recommends a 1.5x4.5 Weaver scope with a one inch tube and small objective for large calibers. That should mean that you should have a bigger scope wirh more zoom as you decrease in caliber and recoil. So clearly a 4x12 with a 40mm objective is not enough scope. You should be using at LEAST a 4.8x35 with a 60mm objective and a 36mm tube on a .22 rim fire or you are not doing it right. The following scope should be considered a good starting point.

.22 LR Rifle Scope


It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.

� Dwight D. Eisenhower
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7063234 02/02/18 06:21 PM
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568
G
garyrapp55 Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
G
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568

Last edited by garyrapp55; 02/02/18 06:24 PM.
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Toxarch] #7063595 02/02/18 10:49 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
T
TFF Caribou Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
Originally Posted By: Toxarch
Originally Posted By: garyrapp55
Originally Posted By: Tff caribou
Originally Posted By: tenyearsgone
JG,

I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all.


Opinions are rarely wrong or right. If somebody is happy with their build and it is doing what they want it to, then it’s not wrong, it’s just different than yours.

My new 10/22 build will have a 4-12x40 on it. It’s way more scope than most people use on a 22. I intend for this rifle to shoot tiny little groups at 75-100 yards. I want the magnification so I can see the dime sized dots I want to shoot at.


I also have a 10/22. I shoot pieces of paper, cans, and turtles with it. I use a Nikon 4x fixed. A 4x12 is a ridiculously high powered scope for rimfire. Your build is all wrong. I have owned and modified 1 10/22 and I know what is best for you. Your 4x12 on a 10/22 is too cumbersome to sit on bags. Please revise your build.


But if you read that article, the ace shooter with bad eyes (he says that) recommends going with smaller scopes with less zoom as you increase in caliber and recoil. He recommends a 1.5x4.5 Weaver scope with a one inch tube and small objective for large calibers. That should mean that you should have a bigger scope wirh more zoom as you decrease in caliber and recoil. So clearly a 4x12 with a 40mm objective is not enough scope. You should be using at LEAST a 4.8x35 with a 60mm objective and a 36mm tube on a .22 rim fire or you are not doing it right. The following scope should be considered a good starting point.

.22 LR Rifle Scope


I have one of those on my crossman. Not enough scope.


The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator [Re: Chickenman] #7063743 02/03/18 12:33 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
T
Toxarch Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
"I can shoot the fleas off a dog's back at 500 yards, Tannen. And it's pointed right at your head."


It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.

� Dwight D. Eisenhower
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3