Forums46
Topics537,812
Posts9,729,417
Members87,042
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7060485
01/31/18 08:46 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
tenyearsgone
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418 |
Still doesn’t need it on a 6.8. Buy a better suited scope.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: tenyearsgone]
#7060495
01/31/18 08:49 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
TFF Caribou
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436 |
Just like you don’t need that mount, yet, here we are. You both have things, and you both like them. /thread
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: TFF Caribou]
#7060499
01/31/18 08:51 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
tenyearsgone
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418 |
Just like you don’t need that mount, yet, here we are. You both have things, and you both like them. /thread Mount isn’t hurting my shooting. You can’t win, because I have posted facts.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: tenyearsgone]
#7060517
01/31/18 08:57 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
SapperTitan
Taking Requests
|
Taking Requests
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609 |
Just like you don’t need that mount, yet, here we are. You both have things, and you both like them. /thread Mount isn’t hurting my shooting. You can’t win, because I have posted facts. you have posted an opinion and one that is wrong at that but good try.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7060524
01/31/18 09:02 PM
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418
tenyearsgone
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,418 |
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: tenyearsgone]
#7060660
01/31/18 10:13 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609
SapperTitan
Taking Requests
|
Taking Requests
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 29,609 |
I didn't see any links to an article
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: tenyearsgone]
#7060716
01/31/18 10:40 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,164
J.G.
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,164 |
JG,
I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all. Man sized targets are huge. I have shot against Fort Sill Army snipers. Those were not the optics they were using. And they said all of us were nuts. Small targets, far away, lots of wind. They finished in the middle of 120 shooters.
800 Yard Steel Range Precision Rifle Instruction Memberships and Classes Available
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: tenyearsgone]
#7060742
01/31/18 11:08 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 915
hdfireman
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 915 |
Article is an opinion and not fact. There are no FACTS out there that list a certain magnification range for calibers. It is based on preference of the shooter. Some people like more mag than others and some like less. Therefore it is not the wrong scope for that gun if the shooter wants it.
Last edited by hdfireman; 01/31/18 11:09 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7060752
01/31/18 11:15 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,805
MO
Pro Tracker
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,805 |
This thread has made me smile, why get so worked up over someone else's rifle, He is not asking you to shoot it. Chickenman-- nice rifle, I can make you a good deal on a Leupold mark 4 CQ/T , then everyone can sleep at night MO
MY BACKYARD , 20,000 ACRES , NO MOWING
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7060864
02/01/18 12:24 AM
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,037
Vern1
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,037 |
I really like the wood furniture. It's not just another cookie cutter AR. Go shoot it and have fun with it.
Not a single one of the 300+ pigs I've killed with my 6.8s has ever said anything about using too much magnification.
Cheers, Vern1 Texans since The Old 300 in 1824 NRA Lifetime Member
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Payne]
#7060872
02/01/18 12:30 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 23,631
Payne
Cat Herder
|
Cat Herder
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 23,631 |
That's the great thing about being a Texan, Freedom. OP never said it was a long range rifle, he can do whatever he wants with his gun. Then he has the wrong scope on it. No he doesn't, just because you have an opinion doesn't make it a fact.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: ETexas Hunter]
#7060943
02/01/18 01:20 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 81
pdog2062
Outdoorsman
|
Outdoorsman
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 81 |
Yep it’s time for the winter urinary olympics
Y,all hang on I'm gonna drive closer
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7060959
02/01/18 01:32 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,658
Dustnsand
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,658 |
People also don’t need more than one gun, having multiple is dumb and a dangerous arsenal. I’m sure I could find tons of articles about that.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: ETexas Hunter]
#7060974
02/01/18 01:42 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 551
KK30RAR
Tracker
|
Tracker
Joined: Aug 2017
Posts: 551 |
he's just another person that knows best for everyone and will argue it to the end there’s one in every crowd
Pulsar xq50 trail Pulsar xq30f Helion
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7061094
02/01/18 03:02 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,453
Big Fitz
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,453 |
Ah chit, no sense in trying to debate one's preferences. How about we all just agree that I am the best looking guy on THF? Otherwise
I was wrong...on anything technical. Fitz............. is right, ya know............
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7061946
02/01/18 08:22 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
Toxarch
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062 |
That article was garbage. One person's opinion trying to justify low power scopes based on "what if". For example: Crowd the eyepiece, and you could wind up with a “shooter’s eyebrow.” He seems to think that everyone should be using 4x scopes with 1" tubes on all rifles because it is easier to find a target with a wide field of view, it "gave a clearer view of my target (which has become increasingly important to aging eyes) and allowed me to place my shots with greater precision", and it is lighter to carry. He also thinks the bigger the round, the smaller the scope should be. Sorry, but nobody should be reading that article and using it for suggestions.
It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.
� Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: TFF Caribou]
#7062138
02/01/18 10:43 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568
garyrapp55
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568 |
JG,
I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all. Opinions are rarely wrong or right. If somebody is happy with their build and it is doing what they want it to, then it’s not wrong, it’s just different than yours. My new 10/22 build will have a 4-12x40 on it. It’s way more scope than most people use on a 22. I intend for this rifle to shoot tiny little groups at 75-100 yards. I want the magnification so I can see the dime sized dots I want to shoot at. I also have a 10/22. I shoot pieces of paper, cans, and turtles with it. I use a Nikon 4x fixed. A 4x12 is a ridiculously high powered scope for rimfire. Your build is all wrong. I have owned and modified 1 10/22 and I know what is best for you. Your 4x12 on a 10/22 is too cumbersome to sit on bags. Please revise your build.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: garyrapp55]
#7062144
02/01/18 10:47 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
TFF Caribou
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436 |
JG,
I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all. Opinions are rarely wrong or right. If somebody is happy with their build and it is doing what they want it to, then it’s not wrong, it’s just different than yours. My new 10/22 build will have a 4-12x40 on it. It’s way more scope than most people use on a 22. I intend for this rifle to shoot tiny little groups at 75-100 yards. I want the magnification so I can see the dime sized dots I want to shoot at. I also have a 10/22. I shoot pieces of paper, cans, and turtles with it. I use a Nikon 4x fixed. A 4x12 is a ridiculously high powered scope for rimfire. Your build is all wrong. I have owned and modified 1 10/22 and I know what is best for you. Your 4x12 on a 10/22 is too cumbersome to sit on bags. Please revise your build. You had me going for a second there.
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7062149
02/01/18 10:51 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568
garyrapp55
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568 |
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7062158
02/01/18 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,601
chalet
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 4,601 |
[censored], doesn't make me any difference. 4x or 24x I can earhole a pig out to 400 yds with my AR. I only shoot 5.56 though because .223 won't reach that far.
Shoot. Eat. Repeat.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: garyrapp55]
#7062672
02/02/18 09:04 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
Toxarch
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062 |
JG,
I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all. Opinions are rarely wrong or right. If somebody is happy with their build and it is doing what they want it to, then it’s not wrong, it’s just different than yours. My new 10/22 build will have a 4-12x40 on it. It’s way more scope than most people use on a 22. I intend for this rifle to shoot tiny little groups at 75-100 yards. I want the magnification so I can see the dime sized dots I want to shoot at. I also have a 10/22. I shoot pieces of paper, cans, and turtles with it. I use a Nikon 4x fixed. A 4x12 is a ridiculously high powered scope for rimfire. Your build is all wrong. I have owned and modified 1 10/22 and I know what is best for you. Your 4x12 on a 10/22 is too cumbersome to sit on bags. Please revise your build. But if you read that article, the ace shooter with bad eyes (he says that) recommends going with smaller scopes with less zoom as you increase in caliber and recoil. He recommends a 1.5x4.5 Weaver scope with a one inch tube and small objective for large calibers. That should mean that you should have a bigger scope wirh more zoom as you decrease in caliber and recoil. So clearly a 4x12 with a 40mm objective is not enough scope. You should be using at LEAST a 4.8x35 with a 60mm objective and a 36mm tube on a .22 rim fire or you are not doing it right. The following scope should be considered a good starting point. .22 LR Rifle Scope
It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.
� Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7063234
02/02/18 06:21 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568
garyrapp55
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,568 |
Last edited by garyrapp55; 02/02/18 06:24 PM.
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Toxarch]
#7063595
02/02/18 10:49 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
TFF Caribou
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436 |
JG,
I’m not wrong though. He doesn’t need such a high power scope unless he’s using something crazy like a 50 or 338 Lapua. He’s hurting his shooting and making his rifle unnecessarily cumbersome if he doesn’t ever zoom in. USMC snipers use a fixed 10x. You don’t see them having problems. Carlos Hathcock used what, a 3x9? Buying a Hubble telescope doesn’t account for good training. On a side note (I know it’s a shocker); I need to refresh my lacking long range skills. See, I’m not a pompous know it all. Opinions are rarely wrong or right. If somebody is happy with their build and it is doing what they want it to, then it’s not wrong, it’s just different than yours. My new 10/22 build will have a 4-12x40 on it. It’s way more scope than most people use on a 22. I intend for this rifle to shoot tiny little groups at 75-100 yards. I want the magnification so I can see the dime sized dots I want to shoot at. I also have a 10/22. I shoot pieces of paper, cans, and turtles with it. I use a Nikon 4x fixed. A 4x12 is a ridiculously high powered scope for rimfire. Your build is all wrong. I have owned and modified 1 10/22 and I know what is best for you. Your 4x12 on a 10/22 is too cumbersome to sit on bags. Please revise your build. But if you read that article, the ace shooter with bad eyes (he says that) recommends going with smaller scopes with less zoom as you increase in caliber and recoil. He recommends a 1.5x4.5 Weaver scope with a one inch tube and small objective for large calibers. That should mean that you should have a bigger scope wirh more zoom as you decrease in caliber and recoil. So clearly a 4x12 with a 40mm objective is not enough scope. You should be using at LEAST a 4.8x35 with a 60mm objective and a 36mm tube on a .22 rim fire or you are not doing it right. The following scope should be considered a good starting point. .22 LR Rifle Scope I have one of those on my crossman. Not enough scope.
The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
|
|
|
Re: 6.8 SPC Dissipator
[Re: Chickenman]
#7063743
02/03/18 12:33 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062
Toxarch
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,062 |
"I can shoot the fleas off a dog's back at 500 yards, Tannen. And it's pointed right at your head."
It is far more important to be able to hit the target than it is to haggle over who makes a weapon or who pulls a trigger.
� Dwight D. Eisenhower
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|