Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Karl, the Greatest, Leonard Blackburn, TXSportsman82, old badge, Marco808
63598 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 87009
stxranchman 52562
bill oxner 46130
RWH24 44568
rifleman 44356
BOBO the Clown 43465
BMD 40835
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 35148
SnakeWrangler 34885
facebook
Forum Stats
63598 Members
45 Forums
451063 Topics
6232714 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
#7034707 - 01/11/18 03:28 PM Jarheads new rifle - H&K
dkershen Online   content


Registered: 05/14/09
Posts: 18370
Loc: Denton/Argyle
http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/the-heckler-koch-m27-the-marines-new-rifle-24019

Anyone have a civilian version of this rifle (The HK416)? Thoughts?
_________________________

To be sure of hitting the target, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target.
www.NewHopeEquine.com

Top
#7034800 - 01/11/18 04:54 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: dkershen]
Theringworm Offline
Tracker

Registered: 03/02/13
Posts: 523
Loc: Midland, TX
“I could kit out every grunt in the Marine Corps with the coolest sh*t head-to-toe for $100 million,” Neller said. “And I intend to do that.”

Who cares about the gun, this guy ^^^^^^^^ sounds like someone I want on my side! Cool gun by the way.

Top
#7034860 - 01/11/18 05:58 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: dkershen]
FiremanJG Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 24556
Loc: Wolfe City, TX
5.56mm bang
_________________________

800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available

Top
#7034881 - 01/11/18 06:13 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: FiremanJG]
jeffbird Online   content


Registered: 03/09/09
Posts: 2927
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
5.56mm bang


Not even a serious option to change right now for a rifleman/infantryman.

Logistics needs to supply all of them and they have to have compatibility with the NATO and allied forces.

5.56 is the universal option at this point.

For an infantryman, the number and weight of rounds is important.

100 rounds of 5.56 is about 2.7 pounds.

100 rounds of 7.62, the only other viable option, is 5.25 pounds.

So for the same amount of weight on the back, they can carry twice as many rounds of 5.56 as 7.62.

A sniper or designated marksman is a whole different issue than guys out on patrol needing to haul as much ammo as possible.

One other factor for the logistics guys, a bullet that uses half as much brass, lead, copper, and powder allows for production of twice as many rounds in a time of war when commodities and supplies may be stretched thin.

Soldiers win battles, logistics can lose a war.

Like Gen. Neller's thinking, nice rifle. up

Hope Leupold will build to the level of quality they are capable of.




Top
#7034931 - 01/11/18 06:52 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: dkershen]
Kevin1 Offline
Tracker

Registered: 04/06/11
Posts: 666
Loc: Allen Tx
.224 valkyrie bolt

Top
#7034946 - 01/11/18 07:05 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: Theringworm]
2Beez Online   happy
Chihuahua

Registered: 07/17/15
Posts: 10296
Loc: Lake Texoma, TX
Originally Posted By: Theringworm
“I could kit out every grunt in the Marine Corps with the coolest sh*t head-to-toe for $100 million,” Neller said. “And I intend to do that.”

Who cares about the gun, this guy ^^^^^^^^ sounds like someone I want on my side! Cool gun by the way.


GD right flag
_________________________

Top
#7034963 - 01/11/18 07:15 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: jeffbird]
FiremanJG Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 24556
Loc: Wolfe City, TX
Originally Posted By: jeffbird
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
5.56mm bang


Not even a serious option to change right now for a rifleman/infantryman.

Logistics needs to supply all of them and they have to have compatibility with the NATO and allied forces.

5.56 is the universal option at this point.

For an infantryman, the number and weight of rounds is important.

100 rounds of 5.56 is about 2.7 pounds.

100 rounds of 7.62, the only other viable option, is 5.25 pounds.

So for the same amount of weight on the back, they can carry twice as many rounds of 5.56 as 7.62.

A sniper or designated marksman is a whole different issue than guys out on patrol needing to haul as much ammo as possible.

One other factor for the logistics guys, a bullet that uses half as much brass, lead, copper, and powder allows for production of twice as many rounds in a time of war when commodities and supplies may be stretched thin.

Soldiers win battles, logistics can lose a war.

Like Gen. Neller's thinking, nice rifle. up

Hope Leupold will build to the level of quality they are capable of.





If this isn't the time to switch over to the 6.5 Grendel, when is the time?

I've had customers that are combat veterans. Several have told me of the enemy "fanning" themselves when hit with a 5.56mm at 300+ yards. They don't go down, and stop fighting. Guess where those SOBs fight from? Go back in the annals of "American Rifleman" and look at the article "Taking back the half mile". The 5.56mm is not effective at 400+ yards. They revamped the designated marksman program and pulled M-14's out of storage. Test fired, and scoped the best ones.

Give those Marines, and soldiers 6.5 Grendels and see an improvement of the number of dead and wounded enemy.
_________________________

800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available

Top
#7034974 - 01/11/18 07:21 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: dkershen]
SR025 Online   shocked
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 09/01/10
Posts: 5934
Loc: DFW
Plenty of souls have been snatched with 5.56

Top
#7035020 - 01/11/18 07:45 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: SR025]
FiremanJG Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 24556
Loc: Wolfe City, TX
Originally Posted By: SR025
Plenty of souls have been snatched with 5.56


Well of course.

And what I wrote above, is also true.
_________________________

800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available

Top
#7035045 - 01/11/18 08:04 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: dkershen]
scottfromdallas Online   content
Tracker

Registered: 06/23/15
Posts: 830
Loc: TX
5.56 would be much more effective with bullets specifically designed to create as much damage as possible, not something that is yaw dependent.

Give them 77 grain bonded tip bullet with a high BC.
_________________________
Scott

Top
#7035055 - 01/11/18 08:10 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: dkershen]
jeffbird Online   content


Registered: 03/09/09
Posts: 2927
Not disagreeing with you about ballistics.

But, changing ammo for all of NATO and allied armies is a monumentally huge task. It can happen, but takes a lot of political buy-in and will be led by the Army. They are working on it. Seems like the new Commander-in-Chief is pretty good at kicking bureaucratic butts to get things moving. Would not be surprising to see a change on the horizon sooner rather than later, unless the swamp creatures drag him down.


Top
#7035090 - 01/11/18 08:32 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: jeffbird]
SapperTitan Online   content
Taking Requests

Registered: 11/17/10
Posts: 24903
Loc: Killeen/Ft Hood, TX
Originally Posted By: jeffbird
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
5.56mm bang


Not even a serious option to change right now for a rifleman/infantryman.

Logistics needs to supply all of them and they have to have compatibility with the NATO and allied forces.

5.56 is the universal option at this point.

For an infantryman, the number and weight of rounds is important.

100 rounds of 5.56 is about 2.7 pounds.

100 rounds of 7.62, the only other viable option, is 5.25 pounds.

So for the same amount of weight on the back, they can carry twice as many rounds of 5.56 as 7.62.

A sniper or designated marksman is a whole different issue than guys out on patrol needing to haul as much ammo as possible.

One other factor for the logistics guys, a bullet that uses half as much brass, lead, copper, and powder allows for production of twice as many rounds in a time of war when commodities and supplies may be stretched thin.

Soldiers win battles, logistics can lose a war.

Like Gen. Neller's thinking, nice rifle. up

Hope Leupold will build to the level of quality they are capable of.



I walked almost 2000 kilometers my last deployment on combat patrols and dismounted route clearance. The last thing I cared about with all that BS gear on was how much my ammo weighed. With all the SAPI plates, smoke grenades, GPS, combat groin protector/armor, weapon, IOTV body armor, ACH, mine detector, heavy azz packs on our backs to protect against RCIEDs, the list goes on. I wouldn’t have had an issue carrying a few extra pounds of ammo in something like 6.8 SPC. Hell my SAW gunner carried 600 rounds on every patrol in his pack. I’d sacrifice the light weight of 5.56 for something that would punch a little bigger hole.
_________________________
If you have IG or FB go give me a follow at TexasKillingFields



Top
#7035137 - 01/11/18 09:07 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: scottfromdallas]
Tactical Cowboy Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 08/23/11
Posts: 3500
Loc: Snyder
Originally Posted By: scottfromdallas
5.56 would be much more effective with bullets specifically designed to create as much damage as possible, not something that is yaw dependent.

Give them 77 grain bonded tip bullet with a high BC.


Or with fast 55 grain or lighter bullets, like it was designed for.

And using it at 300 yards or less, like it was designed for.

The .223/M16/M4 is not a do-all, fits all platform. However, that’s what it is being forced to do.
_________________________
The secret to a long life is to try not to shorten it

Powder coated cast bullets available. https://www.facebook.com/lazyhbullets/

Top
#7035157 - 01/11/18 09:23 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: jeffbird]
FiremanJG Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 24556
Loc: Wolfe City, TX
Originally Posted By: jeffbird
Not disagreeing with you about ballistics.

But, changing ammo for all of NATO and allied armies is a monumentally huge task. It can happen, but takes a lot of political buy-in and will be led by the Army. They are working on it. Seems like the new Commander-in-Chief is pretty good at kicking bureaucratic butts to get things moving. Would not be surprising to see a change on the horizon sooner rather than later, unless the swamp creatures drag him down.



These things are what frustrate those of us that are expected to see, assess, solve, and move to the next problem as efficiently, and correctly as humanly possible. I hate seeing things take years, that could take months, in the hands of do-ers that'll kick in the door amd sort some [censored] out.
_________________________

800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available

Top
#7035159 - 01/11/18 09:24 PM Re: Jarheads new rifle - H&K [Re: SapperTitan]
FiremanJG Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 24556
Loc: Wolfe City, TX
Originally Posted By: SapperTitan
Originally Posted By: jeffbird
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
5.56mm bang


Not even a serious option to change right now for a rifleman/infantryman.

Logistics needs to supply all of them and they have to have compatibility with the NATO and allied forces.

5.56 is the universal option at this point.

For an infantryman, the number and weight of rounds is important.

100 rounds of 5.56 is about 2.7 pounds.

100 rounds of 7.62, the only other viable option, is 5.25 pounds.

So for the same amount of weight on the back, they can carry twice as many rounds of 5.56 as 7.62.

A sniper or designated marksman is a whole different issue than guys out on patrol needing to haul as much ammo as possible.

One other factor for the logistics guys, a bullet that uses half as much brass, lead, copper, and powder allows for production of twice as many rounds in a time of war when commodities and supplies may be stretched thin.

Soldiers win battles, logistics can lose a war.

Like Gen. Neller's thinking, nice rifle. up

Hope Leupold will build to the level of quality they are capable of.



I walked almost 2000 kilometers my last deployment on combat patrols and dismounted route clearance. The last thing I cared about with all that BS gear on was how much my ammo weighed. With all the SAPI plates, smoke grenades, GPS, combat groin protector/armor, weapon, IOTV body armor, ACH, mine detector, heavy azz packs on our backs to protect against RCIEDs, the list goes on. I wouldn’t have had an issue carrying a few extra pounds of ammo in something like 6.8 SPC. Hell my SAW gunner carried 600 rounds on every patrol in his pack. I’d sacrifice the light weight of 5.56 for something that would punch a little bigger hole.


^^And there you have it.
_________________________

800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available

Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >



© 2004-2018 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide