Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
AKC Labrador Puppies, drphilwv, WWiggins, st3w4rt, Babiz
63094 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 84422
stxranchman 52093
RWH24 44568
rifleman 44320
BOBO the Clown 43049
bill oxner 42824
BMD 40628
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 35005
SnakeWrangler 31730
facebook
Forum Stats
63094 Members
46 Forums
443752 Topics
6113287 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#6888521 - 09/15/17 01:43 PM Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle...
DocHorton Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 12/06/10
Posts: 4704
Loc: DFW
The HPA was incorporated into the SHARE act and passed the initial vote in the House Committee of Natural Resources a couple days ago. Up next is a full vote in the House of Representatives.

Story:

https://www.nraila.org/articles/20170913/nra-backed-share-act-passes-committee

Top
#6888598 - 09/15/17 03:19 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: DocHorton]
TexFlip Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 08/18/12
Posts: 10282
Loc: Chambers County

Top
#6888725 - 09/15/17 05:47 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: DocHorton]
P_102 Online   content
Pro Tracker

Registered: 09/23/08
Posts: 1070
Loc: Grapevine
This would be great, but doubtful. Too much lost revenue and too many lost gov't. jobs. P_102.
_________________________
Do not trifle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

Top
#6888748 - 09/15/17 06:19 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: P_102]
rexmitchell Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 02/11/13
Posts: 2367
Originally Posted By: P_102
This would be great, but doubtful. Too much lost revenue and too many lost gov't. jobs. P_102.


I would agree if it was a standalone bill but being lumped in with the SHARE act I think it had a good chance.

Top
#6888757 - 09/15/17 06:34 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: P_102]
scalebuster Online   content
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 11/25/10
Posts: 2808
Originally Posted By: P_102
This would be great, but doubtful. Too much lost revenue and too many lost gov't. jobs. P_102.


I don't think the revenue loss will be that substantial. With 1.3 million suppressors registered in the US. That's only $26 million. That's a drop In the bucket. I don't own one and never will until the government bullsht to own one is lifted. They could still charge for the tax and I'd buy one. I think there a lot of sportsmen that feel this way.

Top
#6888831 - 09/15/17 08:30 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: DocHorton]
P_102 Online   content
Pro Tracker

Registered: 09/23/08
Posts: 1070
Loc: Grapevine
Maybe my numbers are wrong, aren't tax stamps $200 and not $20? In an article 15 months ago about SilencerCo, they were selling 18,000 suppressors a month, had 65% market share and were growing 100% every year. Using those numbers, If you run the math I think you'll find that 2017 tax revenues from the entire market should be somewhere around $150,000,000 and close to $300,000,000 in 2018 if the growth rate stays the same.

P_102
_________________________
Do not trifle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

Top
#6895037 - 09/21/17 08:55 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: DocHorton]
wtjim Offline
Tracker

Registered: 07/18/12
Posts: 607
I'd pay the $200 to cash and carry, no BS

Top
#6895524 - 09/22/17 12:14 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: wtjim]
SnakeWrangler Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 01/22/11
Posts: 31730
Loc: Over yonder.....
Originally Posted By: wtjim
I'd pay the $200 to cash and carry, no BS

Same here....
_________________________
Originally Posted By: bill oxner
Now that food has replaced sex in my life, I can't even get into my own pants.

"Death is permanent...everything else is temporary!"

"You Cannot Simultaneously Be Politically Correct And Intellectually Honest!"

Top
#6895695 - 09/22/17 02:45 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: DocHorton]
Hunter-Steve Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 01/17/10
Posts: 1047
Loc: Plano. TX
We will have to wait and see. If it passes the House vote I will get excited. But even then it could get stripped out.
_________________________
NRA Life Member - NRA Certified Instructor

Top
#6895948 - 09/22/17 07:29 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: DocHorton]
rogerh Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 04/26/13
Posts: 272
Loc: Lampasas
Keep your fingers crossed up

Top
#6896097 - 09/22/17 09:54 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: wtjim]
syncerus Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 12/01/08
Posts: 2557
Loc: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted By: wtjim
I'd pay the $200 to cash and carry, no BS


I understand and sympathize with your view, but suppressors, stripped of Hollywood BS, are simply **safety** devices that reduce noise output by 30 db and nothing more. Having them on the NFA is irrational and is based on factual misinformation.

Look, how many people have you met **in person** who have had hearing damaged caused by firearms? For me, the number is well over 100, and probably over 200. Firearms are a serious danger to hearing and suppressors are the best way to reduce the epidemic of hearing damage within the shooting community.
_________________________
NRA Endowment & DSC Lifer

Top
#6896789 - 09/23/17 08:28 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: SnakeWrangler]
rexmitchell Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 02/11/13
Posts: 2367
Originally Posted By: SnakeWrangler
Originally Posted By: wtjim
I'd pay the $200 to cash and carry, no BS

Same here....


I've been willing to compromise on that for years. I'll put up the money but I want to walk out the door with it that day.

Top
#6908220 - 10/03/17 11:19 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: syncerus]
z71dustin Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 10/27/09
Posts: 11355
Originally Posted By: syncerus
Originally Posted By: wtjim
I'd pay the $200 to cash and carry, no BS


I understand and sympathize with your view, but suppressors, stripped of Hollywood BS, are simply **safety** devices that reduce noise output by 30 db and nothing more. Having them on the NFA is irrational and is based on factual misinformation.

Look, how many people have you met **in person** who have had hearing damaged caused by firearms? For me, the number is well over 100, and probably over 200. Firearms are a serious danger to hearing and suppressors are the best way to reduce the epidemic of hearing damage within the shooting community.


No, hearing protection is. That's just a silly justification

Top
#6908413 - 10/04/17 08:39 AM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: DocHorton]
Buzzsaw Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 10951
Loc: Frisco, Texas
its dead now
_________________________
"I ain't here for a long time, I'm here for a good time"
King George Strait



Top
#6908740 - 10/04/17 12:40 PM Re: Hearing Protection Act passes first hurdle... [Re: DocHorton]
Spacemonkey Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 12/03/09
Posts: 1214
Loc: North Texas
Yep it’s been shelved indefinitely!

They are remaining mum on national retroprocity. My bet is it will die too!


Edited by Spacemonkey (10/04/17 12:42 PM)

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide