Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
lone_star, RDC, timberghost, T-Rock, WyomingHunter
62199 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 82266
stxranchman 52092
RWH24 44568
rifleman 44214
BOBO the Clown 42358
BMD 40617
bill oxner 39266
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 34452
sig226fan (Rguns.com) 31323
facebook
Forum Stats
62199 Members
46 Forums
432648 Topics
5960627 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Topic Options
#6880025 - 09/06/17 08:56 AM Ladder test article
TackDriver Online   content
Tracker

Registered: 05/02/14
Posts: 595
For those who like to read about ladder testing. Good article.

http://www.65guys.com/10-round-load-development-ladder-test/

Top
#6880139 - 09/06/17 10:44 AM Re: Ladder test article [Re: TackDriver]
patriot07 Online   content
Pro Tracker

Registered: 11/06/11
Posts: 1559
Loc: Royse City, TX
Interesting article. One point of discussion:
Originally Posted By: article
The following quote from Scott summarizes a key observation with load development, “Im not sure it is optimal charge weight at all but optimal velocity for the bullet weight that determines barrel harmonics. The reason I say this is because I can get the exact same great results in a velocity node using seven different powders. As long as I keep the bullet going the same velocity from powder to powder I get the same result. Powder charge may be slightly different but as long as I’m in the velocity happy place for that bullet and my cartridge, powder is secondary.”
This has not been the case with my Tikka Varmint 223. My optimal summer load with CFE223 shoots faster than my optimal winter load with CFE223. My optimal load with Varget shoots faster (and not quite as tight) as both CFE223 loads. There is about 150 fps difference between my summer CFE223 load and my Varget load, but both shoot 1/2" groups or smaller. My CFE223 load that matches varget speed-wise is awful, and my Varget load that matches CFE223 speed wasn't very good either.

Top
#6880144 - 09/06/17 10:48 AM Re: Ladder test article [Re: TackDriver]
FiremanJG Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 21136
Loc: Wolfe City, TX
Ladder Tests work, plain and simple. They save time, and components, and barrel life especially on the barrel burners.

I have found a terrific load in a mere 9 shot ladder test, followed by a 5 shot group, and was done. That's only 14 rounds fired. Then obtained DOPE on that load from 200 to 800 yards, then let the barrel cool and run the range again.

But unlike what they are speaking about hunting velocity, I am paying attention to where bullets land in relation to each other. When they're not loaded the same, and are grouping sub MOA, that's the node. At the tail end, I find they do in fact have a low ES, when I finally do chronograph them. So I'm not saying he's wrong, we are just approaching it from a different direction. I will not have a Magneto Speed attached to my barrel during testing. I don't care how light they are, they weigh someting, so they're changing barrel harmonics, for all but the heaviest contour barrels, like an MTU contour.

The cartridges I've performed ladder test on:

.223 (bolt action)
.223 (AR)
.22-250
.243
6.5 Creedmoor
.260 Rem
7mm-08
.308 Win (bolt action)
.308 Win (AR)
7 Rem Mag
.300 Win Mag

Every single cartridge worked well with a ladder test.
_________________________

800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available

Top
#6880148 - 09/06/17 10:52 AM Re: Ladder test article [Re: TackDriver]
dee Online   content
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 04/10/10
Posts: 5017
Loc: Red River way
I've done that method before with good luck. Can't say I gotvthe idea from them though. Sat there one night looking at my magneto and decided to try it.
_________________________
"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt

Top
#6880338 - 09/06/17 02:14 PM Re: Ladder test article [Re: TackDriver]
TackDriver Online   content
Tracker

Registered: 05/02/14
Posts: 595
I did 5 ladder tests the last 6 load developments, all 5 is shooting excellent groups of half an inch to less than an inch at 300 yards ( Accubonds, Ballistic tips and SMK) except for the Long Range Accubond. I replaced it with the 160 Accubond which did outstanding. I have stopped shooting 3 round groups during load developments, waste of bullets and time. Ladder tests have been much more efficient and saves time, not only that, gives my barrel burners a longer life. I changed my tactics because of Fireman's successful tests. up

Top
#6880473 - 09/06/17 05:10 PM Re: Ladder test article [Re: TackDriver]
FiremanJG Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 21136
Loc: Wolfe City, TX
up
_________________________

800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available

Top



© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide