texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
4Notch, Niknoc76, breederbuck33, Breakin25, Jee
72039 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,514
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,845
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,757
Posts9,728,733
Members87,039
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Thermal monoculars #6846652 08/05/17 10:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 454
D
Dalep Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
D
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 454
Looking for entry level thermal to scan with. See the flir and leuopold options are about $600 a peace. Was able to play with the Leuopold in store today and seemed good on human targets at 10 yds but obviously not real likely use. I hunt semi-dense woods so everything's under 100yds.

Is one better then the other? Is there similar monocular in price I'm not looking at?

Thanks
Dale

Re: Thermal monoculars [Re: Dalep] #6846763 08/06/17 12:45 AM
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 698
R
rogerh Online Content
Tracker
Online Content
Tracker
R
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 698
Courious myself. popcorn

Re: Thermal monoculars [Re: Dalep] #6846982 08/06/17 04:50 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,984
T
Texas buckeye Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 10,984
if your price range is $600, then you probably won't find much worth the money you are spending on it....

A decent thermal monocular is going to run about 2K.

I will say that using a thermal in dense woods is going to be a frustrating endeavor. Thermal gets blocked by brush very easily, and the trees and brush will put off thermal footprint as well, so if you are only hunting woods, it may be frustrating without having some clearings within the woods you will be sitting over.

Having said all that, a decent thermal for what you are looking to do (hunt woods) will need to have sufficient resolution to make out prey vs background. Thus, the cost will go up. Any of the sub 1K units will be useless for your application.

Re: Thermal monoculars [Re: Dalep] #6847381 08/06/17 07:37 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,069
MDMORROW Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,069
Nothing really in that price range unfortunately. Least option of any decent quality is the base model pulsar.


[Linked Image]
Re: Thermal monoculars [Re: Dalep] #6848329 08/07/17 04:23 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 637
Outdoor Legacy Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 637
Dale, I'd like to hear a little more about what you are wanting to do with the thermal.

What animals will you be scanning for?

Is this primarily for recovering a dead animal or spotting animals for hunting?

How far will your open areas or thin brush/trees give you a clear line of sight?

If you are night hunting, what NV will you be shooting with?

Sorry for all the questions, but since it sounds like you are hoping to spend less than something like the higher end Pulsar XQ23V ($1,699), I want to see if the Leupold or Flir might work for you. Unfortunately there isn't much in between the $600-$700 options and the $1,699+ options.


Jason


Outdoor Legacy - Owner
The Late Night Vision Show - Co-Host
[Linked Image]
Night Vision, Thermal & Accessories
OutdoorLegacyGear.com
(877)350-1818


Re: Thermal monoculars [Re: Dalep] #6849812 08/08/17 09:47 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,872
G
GLC Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
G
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,872
Stay away from the $600 Flir, not really worth the money. That may be the wrong statement. I do not think it will do what you want, at least it did not for me. I sent mine mack.


Re: Thermal monoculars [Re: Dalep] #6857801 08/15/17 11:49 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 406
F
fr3db3ar Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
F
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 406
Get into the bottom end of Pulsar. You won't be disappointed.

Re: Thermal monoculars [Re: Dalep] #6858262 08/16/17 01:02 PM
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,789
Z
ZenArchery Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
Z
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,789
All night vision struggles when it comes to dense woods. Thermals are better then other generations of night vision but thick foliage is thick foliage. Once the foliage dies away in the fall/winter months it's awesome but dense woods is going to put off heat signature that will cover majority of the animal making it difficult to identify.

Re: Thermal monoculars [Re: Dalep] #6861681 08/19/17 05:40 PM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 406
F
fr3db3ar Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
F
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 406
I don't find that be the case at all. Does brush block your sight? Sure, just like in the daytime but, heat still pops and your in total darkness and stand a good chance at a shot. Pick your woods, open is better for seeing but odds are you're going to call them in close.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3