|
Forums46
Topics537,996
Posts9,731,578
Members87,053
| |
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
 Re: ATN ThOR HD 384 vs. Pulsar APEX 384
[Re: dfwroadkill]
#6690596
02/28/17 11:30 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,355
TXGH
Pro Tracker
|
|
Pro Tracker
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,355 |
This says a lot about his experience with thermal. You have to NUC all manual thermals at intervals. It's not a downside of that particular product. That is just the way it is with the modality. In my experience, every automatically NUCing thermal waits too long between NUC's and you end up manually NUCing anyway. Some Thermal Units Like the new Pulsar Trail XP38 is auto and do not have to manually NUC the units. This is what I meant byt that statement. But then again I am sure you already knew that since you know so much about it.
|
|
|
|
Re: ATN ThOR HD 384 vs. Pulsar APEX 384
[Re: SachalATN]
#6690708
03/01/17 12:59 AM
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,239
Double Naught Spy
THF Trophy Hunter
|
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 8,239 |
There are 3 levels/modes of NUCing.
You have Automatic where the unit does it at a given interval. Some are too slow and some are too frequent. It is on a timer which almost never meets actual needs. In Automatic, the unit covers the sensor and initiates the NUC without user input.
You have Manual whereby the user has to both cover the sensor (via covering the lens) and initiate the NUC.
Then some units have a Semi-auto NUC whereby the user initiates the NUC and the unit covers the sensor and the user does not have to do this step.
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, txcornhusker
|
