Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Karl, the Greatest, Leonard Blackburn, TXSportsman82, old badge, Marco808
63598 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 87009
stxranchman 52562
bill oxner 46130
RWH24 44568
rifleman 44356
BOBO the Clown 43465
BMD 40835
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 35148
SnakeWrangler 34887
facebook
Forum Stats
63598 Members
45 Forums
451066 Topics
6232741 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Topic Options
#6624919 - 01/09/17 08:53 PM coal vs powder charge
Matt Hejl Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 05/17/11
Posts: 355
When trying to find a certain load that works best with a specific rifle, how do you work your loads to find the most accurate considering the charge weight and the length of cartridge both factor in. Which do you guys start tweaking first?

Top
#6624922 - 01/09/17 08:55 PM Re: coal vs powder charge [Re: Matt Hejl]
dee Online   content
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 04/10/10
Posts: 5300
Loc: Red River way
Charge first then oal within perspective. If a max load care must be taken enlongating coal for pressure spikes.
_________________________
"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt

Top
#6624937 - 01/09/17 08:59 PM Re: coal vs powder charge [Re: Matt Hejl]
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 09/16/09
Posts: 12697
Loc: Lewisville, TX
Powder first, always. Most of the time I can tune the load with the powder if you seat the bullet correctly to the lands. If the bullet is a tangent ogive, then seating depth will not matter much, as they as not seating depth sensitive. The newer, more aggressive bullets coming out, some have a very aggressive secant ogive, and will need to be seated close to the lands to shoot well. If you are feeding from a short magazine, then these bullets can be difficult to tune with a long jump, no matter the powder charge. So, it really depends on what type of bullet you run, as to what method works best.
_________________________

Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
www.DallasReloads.com
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL

Top
#6625017 - 01/09/17 09:34 PM Re: coal vs powder charge [Re: Matt Hejl]
Matt Hejl Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 05/17/11
Posts: 355
Do you guys just start around .02 off lands?

I am shooting a pro Hunter bullet.

Top
#6625032 - 01/09/17 09:40 PM Re: coal vs powder charge [Re: Matt Hejl]
RHutch Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 05/25/13
Posts: 485
Loc: Frisco
I start at the lands with the long bullets. Only one way to go from there for tuning.

Top
#6625154 - 01/09/17 10:21 PM Re: coal vs powder charge [Re: Matt Hejl]
jeffbird Offline


Registered: 03/09/09
Posts: 2927
Originally Posted By: Matt Hejl
Do you guys just start around .02 off lands?

I am shooting a pro Hunter bullet.


Only test one variable at a time.

I start with bullets 0.010" off the lands and then leave them alone and test increasing charges of powder.

Except for the big boomers, I start 3.0 grains below max, load 1 round moving up 0.3 gr at a time, just to check speed which is an indicator of pressure and also watch for signs of excessive pressure on the brass and bolt lift.

Then with 2.0 grains from max, move up 0.2 gr for three rounds each the last two grains up to max.

Test at least at 200 yards and good loads will be apparent. 300 makes it even more obvious.

The Pro Hunters have a tangent ogive and usually are not sensitive to seating depth.

What round are you loading?

Top
#6625160 - 01/09/17 10:22 PM Re: coal vs powder charge [Re: Matt Hejl]
kmon1 Online   content
junior

Registered: 09/27/06
Posts: 22909
Loc: Texas
I find the lands then check if seated to that depth will work through the magazine, if not shorten them for proper function.

With the GK bullet .02 off the lands should work well that has an ogive that is not that depth sensitive and can usually get very good accuracy with adjusting the powder charge
_________________________
Guidelines / Rules of Conduct
http://www.texashuntingforum.com/rules.htm

RULES for using the TRADING POST
http://texashuntingforum.com/forum/ubbth..._PO#Post6605808

Top
#6625182 - 01/09/17 10:26 PM Re: coal vs powder charge [Re: Matt Hejl]
Matt Hejl Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 05/17/11
Posts: 355
300 blackout supersonic and 243.

Both in single shot rifles.

Top



© 2004-2018 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide