Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
DBill, george86, swatmitchell, Garrett Hallman, James C Davis
60890 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 78782
stxranchman 52092
RWH24 44568
rifleman 43904
BOBO the Clown 41256
BMD 40575
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 34027
bill oxner 33784
sig226fan (Rguns.com) 30844
facebook
Forum Stats
60890 Members
45 Forums
413491 Topics
5759506 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Topic Options
#6609499 - 12/31/16 11:10 AM Sig Sauer Echo 1
six_anthonys Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 09/11/06
Posts: 1059
Loc: DFW Texas
Anyone played with it? Have heard good and bad reports.
_________________________
Thanks
6As

Top
#6611945 - 01/02/17 07:56 AM Re: Sig Sauer Echo 1 [Re: six_anthonys]
Double Naught Spy Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 05/18/11
Posts: 4301
Loc: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
I put one on a .50 Beowulf for a while. Here is a brief video taken with my cell phone behind the scope while watching deer. There is some image bloom on the recording that wasn't actually in the scope.



Here are my take aways from using the scope.

It is comparable to slightly better than a 320 resolution 19mm FLIR PS32 spotting scope even though it has actual less resolution, but it has a much larger display. There were times I could spot animals better with the Echo than I could with the PS32, though the PS32 did a better job of showing objects in the background.

I shot hogs at over 100 yards with it, no problem. I could have shot farther but didn't get the opportunities.

It has a narrower FOV than I would expect for the magnification. That makes it harder to pick up running animals.

This scope can handle much more recoil than most other thermal scopes that are usually only rated to .308.

Controls are easy to use.

Unit is compact and light (compared to other thermals).

The user is definitely backlit by the scope. I would stalk with it covered and then uncover when setting up for a shot so as to reduce the amount of time I was backlighting myself.

This is not a high dollar thermal scope. I would suggest that unless you have a need for a scope that can handle a lot of recoil, you might be better off going with a Pulsar Apex XD38a or XD50a for a bit more money, but for what I think is the best bang for the buck. You would get better capabilities and a better image with the Pulsars and they can handle up to .308.
_________________________
Kill a Hog and Save the Planet
My Videos https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCG6la_HDvAobPBTDtj5B-lQ

Top



© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide