texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
wstu1405, edtx12, mikerobbins, SBell, Lampman Hill
72691 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,840
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 66,366
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
Stub 45,498
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics546,119
Posts9,831,407
Members87,691
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: Bdontexoma] #6615434 01/04/17 04:57 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 977
B
bossbowman Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 977
Just not buying the reasoning for cancelling deer hunting there for 2 years in a row. Its limiting hunter opportunity/access is what it is, complain how bad feral hogs are but this WMA will only let you hunt them for a few weeks in the spring? What is the biological reason for limiting feral hog harvests?

Last edited by bossbowman; 01/04/17 04:59 AM.
Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: Bdontexoma] #6615966 01/04/17 04:38 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3
J
jonboat Offline
Green Horn
Offline
Green Horn
J
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 3
Good question boss. would ask the same about Gus Engeling and their hogs. May be the same fellow running both WMAs?

Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: jonboat] #6616016 01/04/17 05:14 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 977
B
bossbowman Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 977
Originally Posted By: jonboat
Good question boss. would ask the same about Gus Engeling and their hogs. May be the same fellow running both WMAs?



Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: bossbowman] #6618358 01/05/17 10:16 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,556
S
SpoonPlatoon Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,556
Originally Posted By: bossbowman
Just not buying the reasoning for cancelling deer hunting there for 2 years in a row. Its limiting hunter opportunity/access is what it is, complain how bad feral hogs are but this WMA will only let you hunt them for a few weeks in the spring? What is the biological reason for limiting feral hog harvests?


Im not quite sure you understand the severity of this flood. At the Trinidad river gauge this was the second largest flood of record. But in actuality it was the largest flood on record. When every gate on Richland Chambers lake was open the Trinity river flowed north because of the amount of water dumped directly onto the WMA. WMA staff rode the area in boats and found deer stranded on "high ground" then the lake release happened which raised the water level approximately 6'. We are talking a 700 year flood with a lake release on top of that.

I would HIGHLY HIGHLY encourage anyone with questions as to how the WMA is run and questions regarding such to call the RC or Gus office.


[Linked Image]
Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: TOMCAT21] #6618412 01/05/17 10:53 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 163
A
a74aggie Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
A
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 163
Thanks for the Fishermans Cove info. That's good to know


�The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.� Edmund Burke

I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person
Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: Bdontexoma] #6618776 01/06/17 03:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 869
B
Bdontexoma Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 869
Here are a couple of pics from the North side of the WMA from the flood. Pretty crazy high water.



Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: Bdontexoma] #6618974 01/06/17 12:31 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,556
S
SpoonPlatoon Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 8,556
That's a good pic but here is a pic closer to the peak of flooding. You can barely see the roof of the registration Kiosk in the background.



[Linked Image]
Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: bossbowman] #6817282 07/09/17 06:36 PM
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,469
R
rickt300 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
R
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,469
Originally Posted By: bossbowman
Originally Posted By: SpoonPlatoon

Thats quite a statement to make. I highly doubt the guys running the place hate bowhunters as the vast majority of the staff bowhunts. I know that all the WMAs under Gunnels have at least one archery hunt every year and you can bow hunt on any GDA or GDE hunt.

To get this back on track, I know Gunnels is a bowhunter, thats why I was shocked to hear him say what he did. As far as the deer density dropping so your just saying they all drowned? hard to believe they wouldn't not move to higher ground, and deer are surprisingly excellent swimmers.



Last edited by rickt300; 07/10/17 03:48 AM.
Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: NDN98] #6817360 07/09/17 07:57 PM
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 13,847
1
1860.colt Online Content
emoji colt.45
Online Content
emoji colt.45
1
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 13,847
Originally Posted By: NDN98
popcorn

popcorn cheers
First time glanced at this thread...
confused2 lots of different views...
years ago did a doe & spike hunt their...
The OSBWMA was a lease before it opened ta public... Way out of my price range...
They were talking bout flooding that area, had maps at store of what it would look like...
Spent many hours on river when it flooded, boat, canoe, & kayaking... They even turned loose turkeys that first year... Flooding pushed em out...
From Hoard Rd ta almost 155 it looks like a lake... At Hoard water betwwen both bridges & they had ta raise bridge on 14, while as a volanteer fireman went on a rescue call when some one tried ta cross old bridge & current swept it away...
Deer & hog population good... Actualy seeing more deer...
As said in different thread... WMA's limited hunts, for the $48.00 permit, (foodstamp) its archery only for deer, & just like with hogs, gives a sactuary...

flag



i'm postaddic
Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: Bdontexoma] #6857568 08/15/17 08:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 822
M
Mohawk Man Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
M
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 822
Spent a lot of hours setting in a stand there back when it was a type II. It was tuff hunting but good memories. They sold that place and all of the other type II as a way for people that could not afford to pay $1500. For a season lease to have a place to go and that is what it was. I harvested a lot of deer there, and if you got one it ment something. Now it is draw only and they mange for trophys. Not nearly enough people get to enjoy it. Makes me sad. What is better one guy killing a trophy or 100 guys getting to enjoy sitting in a tree stand. The new 13" rule would mange it especially if it was bow only. I would like to see them open it up again.


[Linked Image]
Re: Richland Creek WMA [Re: Bdontexoma] #6858802 08/16/17 09:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 977
B
bossbowman Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
B
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 977
Your not the only one that would like to see it go back the type 2 land, d@mn shame and with the new online draw system odds of getting draw are worse than ever. It been since 1999 that place has been draw only, and the last 2 or 3 years its been closed because of the flood damage, sure seems like a long time.

Last edited by bossbowman; 08/16/17 09:34 PM.
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3