texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
4Notch, Niknoc76, breederbuck33, Breakin25, Jee
72039 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,514
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,848
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,765
Posts9,728,902
Members87,039
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
This ought to be interesting #6532604 11/08/16 03:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
Blinds on public? We all know the two sided coin when it comes to publc blinds. There is the camp that says 'don't hunt my blind' and the other camp that says 'don't build on public and it won't get hunted'. This fat has been chewed for decades now. There is no question of of the law. Blinds on public are just that, public. Debating the legalities orthe ethics of that is not the intention of this post.

Tell me your thoughts. A duck blind on a pontoon boat With TX numbers and an LED anchor light. No motor no nothing else. Legal to park with an anchor light, TX numbers make it personal property, not public.

How does the public opinion react?

Last edited by wal1809; 11/08/16 03:32 PM.
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532607 11/08/16 03:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,645
garrett Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,645
glad I sold all my gear and became a deer hunter so I dont have to bother with this stuff clap


Attention rickym, this is not a troll post, just a good hearted fun type of post
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: garrett] #6532630 11/08/16 03:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
Originally Posted By: garrett
glad I sold all my gear and became a deer hunter so I dont have to bother with this stuff clap


You're a deer hunter? loser8

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532646 11/08/16 03:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,645
garrett Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,645
I am, I find that sitting in a box blind with a heater out of the elements 100 yards away from a feeder thats been feeding year round is very sporty


Attention rickym, this is not a troll post, just a good hearted fun type of post
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532663 11/08/16 04:07 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 18,554
D
ducknbass Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 18,554
If i saw a pontoon boat blind sitting id make a crappie brush pile out of it.

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532675 11/08/16 04:11 PM
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 408
B
BULSPRG Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
B
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 408
IMO- Stationary blind on public water = first come, first served.


Let em Work
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: BULSPRG] #6532680 11/08/16 04:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
Originally Posted By: BULSPRG
IMO- Stationary blind on public water = first come, first served.


Legalities with TX numbers? What say you?

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: ducknbass] #6532681 11/08/16 04:13 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
Originally Posted By: ducknbass
If i saw a pontoon boat blind sitting id make a crappie brush pile out of it.


I am going with you then. Crappie are my favorite even though I suck the worst at catching them.

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532707 11/08/16 04:24 PM
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 328
O
outfitter1 Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
O
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 328
We used to do this all the time in Illinois on the Mississippi. Rule was if not in the blind 30 min. before legal it was fair game but the blind had to move every 72 hrs. by the length of the blind. Only once did we have a problem with someone in the blind before we got there, but when you hunt with 2 State Troupers and a Federal game warden not much of a problem.

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532727 11/08/16 04:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,231
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,231
Kind of a silly question. It is titled property. It is yours no one can argue that fact and if they did you just tell them you are hooking up and taking it to the trailer.

Having said all of that...to show up 15min before legal and someone sitting it and expecting them to move is a richardhead move on your part. Really anything less than an hour prior would classify as such in my book.


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: Judd] #6532762 11/08/16 04:48 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
Originally Posted By: Judd
Kind of a silly question. It is titled property. It is yours no one can argue that fact and if they did you just tell them you are hooking up and taking it to the trailer.

Having said all of that...to show up 15min before legal and someone sitting it and expecting them to move is a richardhead move on your part. Really anything less than an hour prior would classify as such in my book.


I agree on titled property, don't agree on silly question, wondering how the assumption of showing up 15 minutes prior got in this conversation.

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532812 11/08/16 05:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,928
Sniper John Offline
gumshoe
Offline
gumshoe
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,928
Wording and actual rule depends on what lake but it would fall under unattended property, or abandoned property. For example if it is a lake that falls under tpwd aphp, you have to be within 200 yards of it otherwise it becomes unattended property.

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532938 11/08/16 06:06 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,149
T
TxDuck24 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,149
Thad almost like going to set out the decoys the night before to hold a spot only to show up and someone be near your spot.

Plus anchors and lines come untied sometimes

Never know where the blind might end up at lol.


Ruffling Feathers Guide Service
Capt. Brandon Kendrick
936-671-3407
Port O' Connor, Tx
www.rfguideservice.com
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532945 11/08/16 06:10 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,928
Sniper John Offline
gumshoe
Offline
gumshoe
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,928
leaves personal gear, equipment (including decoys), or floating conveyances unattended for more than one hour following the close of legal shooting hours.

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532972 11/08/16 06:25 PM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,185
M
Misfire Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
M
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,185
The following is my opinion.. Public is just that, public. Because someone parked their private property in an effort reserve a spot on public water doesn't make it off limits to whomever shows up first. If you build a permanent blind or park your boat/blind overnight on public water then you take a risk of someone else beating you to it, otherwise you are monopolizing choice spots. I don't believe that permanent blinds should be allowed and everyone should have an equal opportunity to hunt all locations on public water.



"I wanna go fast" -Ricky Bobby

"Mind bottling isn't it?" -Chazz Michael Michaels

.
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6532990 11/08/16 06:33 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
floating conveyances

Don't you just love the state's wording sometimes?

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: Misfire] #6533019 11/08/16 06:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,149
T
TxDuck24 Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
T
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,149
Originally Posted By: Misfire
The following is my opinion.. Public is just that, public. Because someone parked their private property in an effort reserve a spot on public water doesn't make it off limits to whomever shows up first. If you build a permanent blind or park your boat/blind overnight on public water then you take a risk of someone else beating you to it, otherwise you are monopolizing choice spots. I don't believe that permanent blinds should be allowed and everyone should have an equal opportunity to hunt all locations on public water.



When you build a blind you are building for everyone. I have showed up many times to our blinds to have people in them already. Not fit needed. However I do not like when someone leaves there stuff sitting in my blind or decoys out the day before. We have no problem with people beating us to blinds but parking your stuff the night before sucks.

But your right you take that chance and every guide down here knows it. It's the people who aren't from the area or the lazy ones that don't get out and scout and put the time and effort into scouting a place.


Ruffling Feathers Guide Service
Capt. Brandon Kendrick
936-671-3407
Port O' Connor, Tx
www.rfguideservice.com
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6533052 11/08/16 07:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,231
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,231
Originally Posted By: wal1809
Originally Posted By: Judd
Kind of a silly question. It is titled property. It is yours no one can argue that fact and if they did you just tell them you are hooking up and taking it to the trailer.

Having said all of that...to show up 15min before legal and someone sitting it and expecting them to move is a richardhead move on your part. Really anything less than an hour prior would classify as such in my book.


I agree on titled property, don't agree on silly question, wondering how the assumption of showing up 15 minutes prior got in this conversation.


You asked for an opinion...I gave you one, the 15 min I elaborated upon my opinion.


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6533082 11/08/16 07:18 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,278
F
Fooshman Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
F
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 14,278
Throw it in a tree.


[Linked Image]

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: Judd] #6533106 11/08/16 07:34 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
Originally Posted By: Judd
Originally Posted By: wal1809
Originally Posted By: Judd
Kind of a silly question. It is titled property. It is yours no one can argue that fact and if they did you just tell them you are hooking up and taking it to the trailer.

Having said all of that...to show up 15min before legal and someone sitting it and expecting them to move is a richardhead move on your part. Really anything less than an hour prior would classify as such in my book.


I agree on titled property, don't agree on silly question, wondering how the assumption of showing up 15 minutes prior got in this conversation.


the 15 min I elaborated upon my opinion.
On this I agree partyon555

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6533111 11/08/16 07:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,645
garrett Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 10,645
Originally Posted By: wal1809
Originally Posted By: Judd
Originally Posted By: wal1809
Originally Posted By: Judd
Kind of a silly question. It is titled property. It is yours no one can argue that fact and if they did you just tell them you are hooking up and taking it to the trailer.

Having said all of that...to show up 15min before legal and someone sitting it and expecting them to move is a richardhead move on your part. Really anything less than an hour prior would classify as such in my book.


I agree on titled property, don't agree on silly question, wondering how the assumption of showing up 15 minutes prior got in this conversation.


the 15 min I elaborated upon my opinion.
On this I agree partyon555


Judd is from up there north of Waco, cut him some slack confused2


Attention rickym, this is not a troll post, just a good hearted fun type of post
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: garrett] #6533126 11/08/16 07:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,231
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,231
Originally Posted By: garrett
Originally Posted By: wal1809
Originally Posted By: Judd
Originally Posted By: wal1809

I agree on titled property, don't agree on silly question, wondering how the assumption of showing up 15 minutes prior got in this conversation.


the 15 min I elaborated upon my opinion.
On this I agree partyon555


Judd is from up there north of Waco, cut him some slack confused2


Whew...I'll be able to sleep tonite rofl I don't care if you two slap *&#%$ agree with my opinion...that isn't the point, when you ask for others opinion and title it "This ought to be interesting". Was the point just to troll people or did you actually just want opinions so you could kick people in the nuts? I don't understand...if you knew the answer WTF (why not what) did you ask the question? Like I tell my hardheaded wife all the time...don't ask me a question if you already know the answer and just want to argue with me. bang


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6533130 11/08/16 07:44 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
Breath

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: wal1809] #6533238 11/08/16 08:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,071
S
sprigsss Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
S
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,071
The boat is private property, but you are free to setup in that exact same spot in your boat. If blind owner shows up he will have to relocate his blind.


I love how Oklahoma has drawings for locations on their lakes. You get one permit and one location. Most drawings are held at pretty much the same time. So you have to pick your lake and one spot. Randomly drawn, put your permit number on the map.

If you aren't in your blind within 30 minutes of sunrise, anyone can hunt it. Anyone can hunt it at any time, but you can ask them to leave within a certain time period.

Now I understand this might not work so well on lakes near large cities.

Re: This ought to be interesting [Re: sprigsss] #6533252 11/08/16 08:58 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
W
wal1809 Offline OP
THF Celebrity
OP Offline
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,788
Originally Posted By: sprigsss
The boat is private property, but you are free to setup in that exact same spot in your boat. If blind owner shows up he will have to relocate his blind.
Now thats a twist I never thought of, good point.


I love how Oklahoma has drawings for locations on their lakes. You get one permit and one location. Most drawings are held at pretty much the same time. So you have to pick your lake and one spot. Randomly drawn, put your permit number on the map.

There are a couple lakes that do that here. They have both day areas and then blind areas.


If you aren't in your blind within 30 minutes of sunrise, anyone can hunt it. Anyone can hunt it at any time, but you can ask them to leave within a certain time period.

Now I understand this might not work so well on lakes near large cities.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3