Forums46
Topics537,970
Posts9,731,200
Members87,051
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
#6521730
11/01/16 05:32 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257 |
Much has been shared about how the current AR's protect what some might call "Top Hat" bucks, these being older bucks with tall, narrow racks that don't satisfy the 13-inch rule. They are bucks at the same age (or even older) as their wider racked peers that now qualify for harvest.
Since a buck's brow tines (G1's) typically grow longer with age, perhaps the current AR's could be updated in the future to allow hunters to take ANY buck with brow tines of a minimum length.
Such a rule update might also result in hunters being able to judge mature bucks as being legal more quickly.
Last edited by Texas Dan; 11/01/16 07:13 PM.
"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Texas Dan]
#6521744
11/01/16 05:43 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 12,865
PMK
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 12,865 |
guessing that second paragraph first sentence should have been "Since a buck's brow tines (G1's) typically grow LONGER (NOT older) with age,"???
the place I have out near Ozona (non-AR county) would be the reverse of an AR rule ... lots of mature bucks without or very minimal G1 (brow tine, dog catcher, etc.) ...
Last edited by PMK; 11/01/16 05:44 PM.
"everyone that lives dies but not everyone who dies lived..."
~PMK~
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Texas Dan]
#6521882
11/01/16 07:09 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 21,617
pegasaurus
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 21,617 |
TPWD says the antlers are supposed to grow wider with age but that doesn't always happen either.
Funny thing about getting older: Your eyesight starts getting weaker but your ability to see through people's BS gets much better.
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: PMK]
#6521887
11/01/16 07:14 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257 |
guessing that second paragraph first sentence should have been "Since a buck's brow tines (G1's) typically grow LONGER (NOT older) with age,"??? Good catch!
"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Texas Dan]
#6521891
11/01/16 07:15 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
postoak
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124 |
How about you can shoot any buck if you are sure it is at least 3.5 years old. If you are wrong then you have to pay a fine.
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Texas Dan]
#6522042
11/01/16 08:44 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 11,534
rickym
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 11,534 |
I think for 5 years they should change to the 4 on one side rule and then switch back to current ar rules.
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: postoak]
#6522064
11/01/16 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257 |
How about you can shoot any buck if you are sure it is at least 3.5 years old. If you are wrong then you have to pay a fine. I could go with that.
"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: rickym]
#6522066
11/01/16 09:05 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257 |
I think for 5 years they should change to the 4 on one side rule and then switch back to current ar rules. This would not protect the younger basket-racked bucks we need to protect most.
"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Texas Dan]
#6522092
11/01/16 09:20 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,694
krmitchell
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 4,694 |
I think for 5 years they should change to the 4 on one side rule and then switch back to current ar rules. This would not protect the younger basket-racked bucks we need to protect most. Nope, but it would knock out some of the genetics for high and tight racks.
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: krmitchell]
#6522114
11/01/16 09:34 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 11,534
rickym
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 11,534 |
I think for 5 years they should change to the 4 on one side rule and then switch back to current ar rules. This would not protect the younger basket-racked bucks we need to protect most. Nope, but it would knock out some of the genetics for high and tight racks. Exactly, nothin is gonna be perfect. You cant expect everyone out there to be able to judge age so that wont work. Everyone can count, and for a short period you could get rid of alot of your mature deer that will never make 13" and stop them from breeding. I doubt as many young promising deer would get shot as you think if they opened it up to shoot all those big narrow racked bucks.
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Texas Dan]
#6522151
11/01/16 09:54 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,642
QuitShootinYoungBucks
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 15,642 |
I think the 'top hat' bucks are an over-blown problem. Are there some? Sure, I believe it, but hunters from those areas would have you believe they're under every rock and behind every bush. If the problem is as regional as suggested, maybe they should do a test scenario on a few counties and see what happens.
If you allow 3.5 yr old bucks to be shot, you're going to get a whole bunch of burly 2.5 yr old deer killed by guys that have no idea or don't care.
https://web.archive.org/web/20170223065011/http:/www.rrdvegas.com/silencer-cleaning.html
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: QuitShootinYoungBucks]
#6522538
11/02/16 12:52 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257 |
If the problem is as regional as suggested, maybe they should do a test scenario on a few counties and see what happens. Without a mechanism in place (outside of LAMP-managed properties) so that hunters can report harvest data, there's no way to detect if high-grading is occurring.
"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: pegasaurus]
#6522701
11/02/16 02:11 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 20,366
Curly
Overrated
|
Overrated
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 20,366 |
TPWD says the antlers are supposed to grow wider with age but that doesn't always happen either.
preach!
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Texas Dan]
#6522918
11/02/16 09:55 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,593
decook
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,593 |
I think TPWD should allow a "field tag" for non AR deer in addition to your deer tag. Call it an AR tag. The hunter should have to provide a photo to either a warden or a TPWD biologist who makes the call based on the picture. To keep it honest, there should also be a check in after the shot.
I don't think there is a better way to make ARs work then this - there has to be some exception process to the hard rule that makes up for mother nature's exceptions.
Last edited by decook; 11/02/16 09:56 AM. Reason: spelling
Press for an AMERICAN.
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: QuitShootinYoungBucks]
#6522937
11/02/16 10:54 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257
Texas Dan
OP
THF Celebrity
|
OP
THF Celebrity
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 22,257 |
I think the 'top hat' bucks are an over-blown problem. Ironically, the claim by those who are most opposed to AR's would support this. According to them, you can't change the genetic makeup of the herd on LF settings through selective harvesting. If that's true, then it's impossible to high grade or shoot the width out of the deer in a given area. In the end, it would seem what is most important on LAMPS managed properties, is that these "top hat" bucks be allowed to walk, just as they are everywhere else where AR's are in place. Otherwise, evidence of high grading will never be confirmed.
"Some people will never like you because your spirit irritates their demons."
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Texas Dan]
#6522941
11/02/16 11:02 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 165
CTR
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 165 |
I think TPWD should stay at a minimum from making decisions for me. The less rules to operate under the better. They could do away with the rule and I'd be fine... To me it's silly just like steel shot... Or 3 in the tube...
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: CTR]
#6523093
11/02/16 12:55 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,806
Deerhunter61
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,806 |
I think TPWD should stay at a minimum from making decisions for me. The less rules to operate under the better. They could do away with the rule and I'd be fine... To me it's silly just like steel shot... Or 3 in the tube... I wonder how old you are...and I'm not being disrespectful! I grew up hunting the piney woods on timber land before it leased it to the state. And frankly back then we were lucky to see a deer with antlers. When Type II came about it took all of one year to utterly destroy what little opportunity was there on the timber land. People who didn't know about the land before came in like hordes...I hunted it the first year on opening weekend and had 5 shots zip by me before 9am....I scurried down my lean to and sat at the bottom of the stand until about 10:30 and then went to camp, packed and headed home. Back then the "brown it's down" was utterly true. The idea that hunters can and will be responsible and let deer walk is simply wishful thinking. Without the AR restrictions in some of these counties you would experience what I used to experience...and that was if you "saw" a DOE you had a successful weekend of deer hunting. There is simply no good way to manage the deer herd...and limiting the number of bucks thru tags does not work! Because if it's brown it's down still exists! So for all of its problems the ARs are still the most effective way to protect the buck herd. And now you actually have a chance to see a buck when you go to the woods.
Last edited by Deerhunter61; 11/02/16 12:57 PM.
|
|
|
Re: A possible solution to "top hat" bucks
[Re: Deerhunter61]
#6523114
11/02/16 01:06 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 165
CTR
Woodsman
|
Woodsman
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 165 |
I think TPWD should stay at a minimum from making decisions for me. The less rules to operate under the better. They could do away with the rule and I'd be fine... To me it's silly just like steel shot... Or 3 in the tube... I wonder how old you are...and I'm not being disrespectful! I grew up hunting the piney woods on timber land before it leased it to the state. And frankly back then we were lucky to see a deer with antlers. When Type II came about it took all of one year to utterly destroy what little opportunity was there on the timber land. People who didn't know about the land before came in like hordes...I hunted it the first year on opening weekend and had 5 shots zip by me before 9am....I scurried down my lean to and sat at the bottom of the stand until about 10:30 and then went to camp, packed and headed home. Back then the "brown it's down" was utterly true. The idea that hunters can and will be responsible and let deer walk is simply wishful thinking. Without the AR restrictions in some of these counties you would experience what I used to experience...and that was if you "saw" a DOE you had a successful weekend of deer hunting. There is simply no good way to manage the deer herd...and limiting the number of bucks thru tags does not work! Because if it's brown it's down still exists! So for all of its problems the ARs are still the most effective way to protect the buck herd. And now you actually have a chance to see a buck when you go to the woods. Im pushin 50, my experience differs from yours. Im not saying the program doesn't work, just saying the less gov the happier I am...
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|