texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
garey, SteveG, justin77, Tjh, Clint Mcmullen
72051 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,524
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,908
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,935
Posts9,730,853
Members87,051
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6513496 10/26/16 11:21 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,699
6
603Country Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
6
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,699
X-ray, I went from a 270 to a 260 a few years back. It's lighter, shorter, recoils a good bit less, and seems to kill deer just as well. I used the 100 gr Nosler BT and the 120 gr version. I think the 120 is more effective on deer and pigs, but only a little bit. The 100 gr kicks noticeably less. Ignore the people that will push you to use 140 gr bullets. Not necessary.

I recommend the Tikka T3 lite Stainless with the 20 inch barrel.


Not my monkeys, not my circus...
Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: 603Country] #6513580 10/27/16 12:04 AM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
X
xraytracker84 Offline OP
Woodsman
OP Offline
Woodsman
X
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
603 appreciate your experience and opinion. The information on bullet weight is great. That is what I'm looking for.

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6514031 10/27/16 12:09 PM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,806
D
Deerhunter61 Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,806
Originally Posted By: xraytracker84
I have recently been tossing around the idea of picking up a 6.5 creedmoor for hunting. Not so much for myself, but more so for my wife and oldest son. I have been a longtime .270 guy. The reason I was looking at this round is because of lighter recoil than a 308 and more knockdown than a 243. I know that ammo is quite a bit more expensive and harder to come by than the two aforementioned staples, but as I reload this is not a total deal breaker for me. I was wondering if anyone on here has hunted with, or knows someone who has hunted with one and what they thought the pros and cons were. I would also like to know if there was a significant different in the recoil of the 308 and the 6.5 creedmoor.


I own two and I hunt with one of them. I also own a .308. To me the felt recoil is a lot less with the CM and as for performance it's been outstanding so far. Last season was the first year to hunt with it and took a 9 pt buck, a doe, hog and turkey with it. So I'd definitely recommend it. My daughter is coming to town this coming Thanksgiving to go deer hunting with me and its the gun she will be using..

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6514073 10/27/16 12:40 PM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
X
xraytracker84 Offline OP
Woodsman
OP Offline
Woodsman
X
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
Thanks 61

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6515246 10/28/16 02:07 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 60
B
Burton Ranch Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
B
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 60
I have .243, 7mm-08, and 6.5 cm and they are all excellent for whitetail hunting. I think the 6.5 cm would give you the best of the afore mentioned calibers for your particular needs. Less recoil than the 7mm-08 with a heavier bullet than the .243. I do not think you would be disappointed with any of these, but if I could only buy one (off the self under 1k) it would be the 6.5 cm. Regarding factory ammunition cost, the last 140 grn elds I purchased were $32 a box and I'm embarrassed to say my reloads (after a month of load work up changing bullets, primers, etc., etc.) barely surpassed them in accuracy. Hornadys factory 140s out of 2 different rifles are sub .6 moa at 100 yards most days. Hope this helps.

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6515399 10/28/16 05:12 AM
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,030
S
spg Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
S
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2,030
I like my 6.5CM, not scared to send it out to 600. Basically same ballistic chart as my 300WM running 200gr not much difference between the two. Killing efficiency is not a issue with it for sure, same kind of dead with a 300 or 7mm if you hit high shoulder. Running Norma brass with 140VLD's, my 10 year old son shoots it pretty confidently, hes not big about 85lbs but we shoot at least twice a week when I'm home. Recoil is acute no need for a break IMO.

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6515630 10/28/16 01:39 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,900
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,900
For me a 120gr bullet at around 2900 fps is a sweet spot for Texas deer hunting. Flat trajectory, low recoil, plenty of punch. If I were starting out today, I'd jump on the Creed. As it is, I have too much invested in the 257 Roberts: rifles, brass, bullets, etc., so I'll stick with it.

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: JJH] #6515674 10/28/16 02:03 PM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
X
xraytracker84 Offline OP
Woodsman
OP Offline
Woodsman
X
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
The 257 roberts was one of my first thoughts but man are they high when trying to find one in good shape. Started looking around and reading up on the creed moor and could pick up a quality rifle for half of the price of a 257 m77.

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: Burton Ranch] #6515677 10/28/16 02:05 PM
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
X
xraytracker84 Offline OP
Woodsman
OP Offline
Woodsman
X
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 117
Thanks Burton for the info

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6515863 10/28/16 04:01 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,900
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,900
Originally Posted By: xraytracker84
The 257 roberts was one of my first thoughts but man are they high when trying to find one in good shape. Started looking around and reading up on the creed moor and could pick up a quality rifle for half of the price of a 257 m77.


I don,t doubt that at all!

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6516352 10/28/16 08:59 PM
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 122
A
aggie-01 Offline
Woodsman
Offline
Woodsman
A
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 122
If you are a reloader the .257 Roberts is a great round for Texas. I have a Rem 722 Bob and a Winchester Mod 70 .270. The difference in recoil is really noticeable. You are able to shoot 75gr-120gr in the Bob. You can load them up or down for your son. That is what I do for my son. I have 3 different loads (87gr, 100gr, 117gr) that I shoot in mine. Very fun to shoot and hunt with.


Mitch
Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: aggie-01] #6516527 10/28/16 11:17 PM
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,088
C
Creedmoor Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,088
I'm a fan of the 6.5 Creedmoor (imagine that!). My son shoots a 7mm/08. Honestly, there's very little difference in the 2 until you get out past 500 yards, and then only a GOOD shooter will gain any advantage with the Creedmoor.

The 7mm/08 recoils a good bit less than a 308 with the same weight bullets. The Creedmoor is even less than the 7mm.

In a hunting situation, I can't imagine that any deer walking the earth would die any quicker with one than the other. I killed an antelope with my 6.5 and it dropped like a sack of potatoes. Never took a step. But there's no doubt in my mind that the 7mm/08 would have killed it just as dead.

Personally, I'd pass on the 308 and get the 7mm/08 or 6.5 Creedmoor in the platform that suited my needs and financial situation.


.
There's a fine line between BRAVE ... and STUPID.

The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.
Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: fouzman] #6516627 10/29/16 12:31 AM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 868
T
Txhillbilly Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 868
Originally Posted By: fouzman
It's a somewhat new mousetrap that really isn't measurably better than any other mousetrap it's trying to replace. Unless you're a benchrest shooter.


Either some of you have been living under rocks,or don't stay up on things.
The 6.5 Creedmoor isn't a new cartridge,it's been on the market since 2007. There's been a whole lot of others that have came out since then.
What it does better - It allows the use of the longer/heavier match style bullets to be seated out to or near the rifling lands in most rifles,and still remain under the maximum magazine cartridge length. Something the 260 Remington has always had problems doing.

While I'm a big fan of the Creedmoor,I've assembled a few of them on Savage actions. They all shoot outstanding.
I also shoot the 260 Remington,6.5-06,6.5x6.8 AR,and just finished a 260 AI assembly because I got the barrel for a good deal.

The 6.5 Creedmoor isn't for everyone,but I've never seen one that wasn't very accurate.

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6516644 10/29/16 12:47 AM
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,047
M
mikei Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
M
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 7,047
You can't go wrong with a CM. I like everything about it and it has become my "go to" caliber/rifle for hunting.

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6516711 10/29/16 01:45 AM
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 256
D6Ranch Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 256
I have and use 308, 6.5cr, 260rem, 243's and 223's. They all work but as you can imagine there are differences in recoil and performance at longer distances. I do most of my hunting with the 243 and 223 these days and I don't really feel undergunned unless its a shot past 300yds or so even though I've used the 223 that far.

I'm selling the 260 because its a lightweight compact model and is a little too small for me unfortunately. I thought it would be a good compromise between the 308 and 243.

Re: Good and bad for the 6.5 Creedmoor All thoughts wellcome [Re: xraytracker84] #6517087 10/29/16 01:34 PM
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,174
S
scottfromdallas Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
S
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 5,174
You really can't go wrong with 6.5 creedmoor, 7-08 or 308.

Yes some have better BC bullets that won't really matter within 300 yards. The recoil is all be the same if you use similar weight bullets and try to push them at the similar speeds.

You can use 100-125 grain bullets in all of them and significantly reduce the recoil effect.

A 120 grain bullet from the 6.5/7-08 and a 125 grain bullet from a 308 at 2700 fps will feel very mild to most shooters but will still kill to ranges most people shoot.

You can even go down to 100-110 bullets in all of them.

I have a 257 Roberts, 6.5x55, 7-08 & 308 that I reload and shoot.

I've killed a few animals with the 257R and 115 grain Ballistic Tips at 2750 FPS and they never took a step. In March, I killed two 170lbs hogs with a 308 using 130 grain Federal Barrier bullets at 2750 Fps and neither took a step. Most of my hunting lately has been with a 338 Federal which is just a 308 necked up to 338 shooting 180 grain Ballistic Tips at 2750 fps.

Last edited by scottfromdallas; 10/29/16 01:51 PM.


Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3