texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
nmmuledeerhunter, Dzia-Dzia, TraeMartin, Beatixre, MooseSteed
71989 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,788
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,417
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,769
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,041
Posts9,719,725
Members86,989
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders #6368598 07/14/16 04:43 AM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 313
Ritter Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 313
A few friends and I were shooting prairie dogs and between the four of us we had a Leica, the new Sig Kilo and my G7 rangefinders. When the shooting slowed down in the afternoon we started playing around with them to see how they compared.

They each did a good job of being able to pick out prairie dogs to 600+ yards when held steady enough and never varied more than two yards between them on the same target.

When we started ranging cattle the Leica began to struggle once the distances were over 800 yards. It would usually take two or three attempts to get an accurate range and a few times it failed to give any distance. Both the Sig and the G7 did very well to over 1100 yards as long as they were used with a steady rest and still gave results within a couple of yards of each other. We were ranging cattle in tall grass, behind or next to small scrub brush, in front of tree lines and over small rises, in each of these scenarios all three did well until the Leica started having a hard time on the longer targets. For hunting I think anyone of three rangefinders would work great.

When we started ranging hard targets to see how far we could get a return I was surprised that the Sig came in second to the G7. It may have been because none of us had a lot of experience using it and that I have been hunting with the G7 for better than five years. The farthest range the Sig was able to return was a metal barn just under 2000 yards and the G7 was able to range a water tower at 2600 yards. It would have been interesting to see where the G7 finally gave up but we couldn't find anything farther than 1 1/2 miles to try the rangefinders out on.


I think if I were buying a rangefinder today I would really have a hard time not picking the Sig Kilo 2000. It doesn't have the ballistic computer of the Gunwerks LRF but it's less than 1/3 the price and you can carry it a shirt pocket while the G7 is almost as large as my binoculars.

I'm still a fan of the G7 and have no plans of ever replacing it. I have a confidence in the range it displays and the shot correction it calculates. Plus you can program five different rifles into it and easily switch between them . Even with all of that I think I want to buy a Sig rangefinder for the times I don't really need the capabilities of the G7.

Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6368680 07/14/16 12:34 PM
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,273
BOBO the Clown Offline
kind of a big deal
Offline
kind of a big deal
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 60,273
I'm sure the program feature is handy on the G7 but the auto darkness feature of the sig to me is better for hunting especially if you also bow hunt.


Donate to TX Youth hunting program.... better to donate then to waste it in taxes

https://secure.qgiv.com/for/gtgoh/mobile
Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6368948 07/14/16 03:55 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,909
C
ChadTRG42 Online Happy
THF Celebrity
Online Happy
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,909
Also, make sure the batteries are new and fresh on each unit when testing them. If one LRF is lower on batteries, it can impact the readings and distance.


[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6369426 07/14/16 10:22 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 313
Ritter Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 313
I'm pretty sure the battery was good in the Leica and I know it was a brand new battery in the Sig. I gave him a new battery that afternoon after we killed the other one playing with it. I think the Sig's performance was impacted more by our experience, or more our lack of, with it. I know how to get a return with the G7 because of the time I've spent using it. That was the first time any of us had to really put the Sig Kilo to the test but still, a water tower is a pretty big target.

Each of us tried the three rangefinders and were impressed with them all, even the Leica. If some one was looking for a LRF to hunt with I wouldn't hesitate to recommend any of the three.

AS for the auto dim feature, I would not really consider that when trying to decided on what to buy. It's nice but for someone that's still hunting it would be pretty easy to range a few landmarks then put the rangefinder away for the rest of the day. For the guys that spot and stalk it only takes a few seconds to change the display's brightness and keep hunting.

Factoring in the wind, light, time of day and terrain, I have no problem taking a long shot at a game animal. One thing I won't do is rush the shot. That's just a bad shot waiting to happen.

I really like the G7 and it will be the one I rely on. That's just my preference.
All that being said I went ahead and ordered the Sig Kilo 200 this morning.

Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6369453 07/14/16 10:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,085
Thanks for the comparison. I've been thinking about a SIG for several months. 90% of the year I need a range finder to be reliable 1000 yards, and less. Apparently the SIG would perform just fine.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6369951 07/15/16 12:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,625
D
DStroud Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,625
I had both the Sig 2000 and the G7 but recently got rid of the G7. My plan is to move to the new Sig that has essentially the Kestrel with Applied Ballistic built-in.
It looks to be much more user friendly than the G7 to input data which was a pain IMO.
Another reason was the G7 was too bulky for my application and I found myself not carrying it after getting the Sig 2000.


"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."

Jack O'Connor 1963
Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: DStroud] #6370049 07/15/16 01:51 PM
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 313
Ritter Offline OP
Bird Dog
OP Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 313
Originally Posted By: DStroud
My plan is to move to the new Sig that has essentially the Kestrel with Applied Ballistic built-in.


Is the new Sig going to be a stand alone LRF/Ballistic Calculator or will it need to be paired with a Kestrel via Bluetooth? If they make one that has an internal ballistic calculator and measures atmospheric data like the G7 then I may need to rethink gear selection.

Last edited by Ritter; 07/15/16 01:57 PM.
Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6370144 07/15/16 03:11 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,625
D
DStroud Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,625
It's a stand alone just like the G7 and in performance better than the Sig 2000.
In the tests Applied Ballistics did the G7 was about middle of the pack with the Sig 2000 a little better and
And they gave it number One for best for price.
The new Sig was only out performed by High dollar RF such as Terrapin class.
Hoping this unit will make it to market before hunting season


"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."

Jack O'Connor 1963
Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6371381 07/16/16 08:23 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,625
D
DStroud Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,625
Ok here is the latest I have seen on the new Sig 2400
Doc works AB so he knows

http://www.scout.com/military/snipers-hi...-the-cup?page=2


"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."

Jack O'Connor 1963
Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: J.G.] #6374682 07/19/16 05:18 PM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 868
T
Txhillbilly Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 868
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
Thanks for the comparison. I've been thinking about a SIG for several months. 90% of the year I need a range finder to be reliable 1000 yards, and less. Apparently the SIG would perform just fine.


I just ordered one a couple days ago,this was the best price that I could find on the net.

http://www.savinglots.com/lotprod.asp?item=SOK16701

Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6375463 07/20/16 03:34 AM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,486
K
Kung Fu Widgeon Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
K
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,486
I got the sig. It's great. The first target I ranged was at the store. Fire hydrant 1300 yards

Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: Ritter] #6378108 07/22/16 01:51 AM
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 868
T
Txhillbilly Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 868
Mine came in today. After reading the instruction manual a little,I took it outside and ranged a water tower 3 different times. Each time the Kilo 2000 read 2775 yards. This thing rocks!

Last edited by Txhillbilly; 07/22/16 01:53 AM.
Re: Comparing Leica CRF 1600, Sig Kilo 2000 and Gunwerks G7 BR2 Rangefinders [Re: DStroud] #6378333 07/22/16 10:56 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
Originally Posted By: DStroud
Ok here is the latest I have seen on the new Sig 2400
Doc works AB so he knows

http://www.scout.com/military/snipers-hi...-the-cup?page=2


I got to look at it first hand in Oklahoma last weekend. It's pretty neat but won't be cheap from what I hear.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3