texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
cpen13, Huntinkid, garey, SteveG, justin77
72053 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,796
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,526
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,922
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,996
Posts9,731,571
Members87,053
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: Judd] #6284272 05/03/16 12:57 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
Dang!

I was going to experiment with them in .005" jump increments.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6284280 05/03/16 01:04 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
I've never touched my oal on my 6cm load and the rifle has around 1200rds on it. The last time I shot anything remotely close to groups was this group my wife shoot at 400yds on a red flag warning day. Is it overly impressive no but with limited experience in poor conditions it's good.



"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: Judd] #6284283 05/03/16 01:05 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
Originally Posted By: Judd
He's missing every window tuning them like a vld. Most everyone I know who shoots hybrids can find a window between touching and .025 jump.

DUDE......read my posts. They shot lights out with great #s at 10 thou off. That's a cartridge overall length of 2.900 in my rifle....that makes it single feed only. Why would I waste any more time dicking with this bullet? It's not the end all when it comes to a great 6.5 pill there's a TON to choose from.

Last edited by jeff1383; 05/03/16 01:10 AM.
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6284311 05/03/16 01:31 AM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,252
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,252
I'm reading.... There are other windows that will shoot like it does at .010. You're jumping over them and missing them. It's no big deal, as you said (and I agree) there are a lot of good bullets out there. I might be jumping to conclusions but I would guess you've not played with hybrids a bunch because everyone who has played with them a lot say they're easier to tune. You just have the vld's figured out and they are easier for you...nothing wrong with that as vld's are a good bullet and if you have them figured out, then why change. I don't like chasing lands and that is the main reason I dumped them and went to a hybrid.


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6284324 05/03/16 01:44 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
I might be missing them if I'm testing in .020 jumps...but then again they're jump tolerant bullets right? I went with the shorter 130 hybrid as it's loaded to a mag friendly length and shoots tight. That bullets allows me plenty of space to load out longer as the throat wears...as does the 139 or 136 scenars that shot well for me.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: Buzzsaw] #6284782 05/03/16 02:32 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 603
D
Dien Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
D
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 603
Originally Posted By: Buzzsaw
Originally Posted By: jeff1383
Originally Posted By: Dien
Four shots at 100, hybrids.

Even Berger says the Hybrid are not as picky as the VLDs, but YMMV.



Cool.....now shoot 3-4 more groups with .010 jump sequence and I bet you won't produce groups near that size. I'm not saying hybrids suck...they're a great bullet. My personal experience is they require a lot of work to shoot well.


Man you jerked the crap out of shot #5


Man, you called me out!

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: jeff1383] #6285290 05/03/16 08:13 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
Originally Posted By: jeff1383
I might be missing them if I'm testing in .020 jumps...but then again they're jump tolerant bullets right?


Sure they're jump tolerant. I think what the guys are saying is that you probably could have made them shoot had you not jumped in such large increments. And, personally I'd want to know if I could refine my methods to make even better hand loads. I think everyone's motivation is that of wanting to help with information for future projects, rather than calling you dumb


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: J.G.] #6285530 05/03/16 11:14 PM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
Originally Posted By: jeff1383
I might be missing them if I'm testing in .020 jumps...but then again they're jump tolerant bullets right?


Sure they're jump tolerant. I think what the guys are saying is that you probably could have made them shoot had you not jumped in such large increments. And, personally I'd want to know if I could refine my methods to make even better hand loads. I think everyone's motivation is that of wanting to help with information for future projects, rather than calling you dumb

No offense taken trust me. I like hybrids and the concept. I have a 338nm that was purposely built just for the 300 grain hybrid with shorter free bore. I usually find my go to load with a bullet in 2 trips to the range. The hybrid in my creedmoor chamber for 2 different rifles required much effort to fine tune. If I have to seat them in groups of 5 by .005 and shoot a box of bullets over multiple trips to the range....I'll just shoot a more forgiving projectile. Again this is just my personal experience. I'm not here telling anyone not to buy them trust me it's a great bullet.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: jeff1383] #6285821 05/04/16 01:40 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
Funny you mention that. Judd taught me something about a month ago.

We had found "the powder charge". I got behind his rifle while he loaded ammo. I shot two rounds with the bullet even with the lands. I told him the spread in Mils. He jumped them .003", and loaded two. I shot those two, and reported the spread. Moved on with more of a jump, and we repeated. We carried on for several seating depth tests with only two shots. Then it tightened up. He noted the jump, and we carried on. It never got better, so we went back to that specific jump and he loaded me three. I shot that group, and it was pretty darn good. We did all this at 200 yards where it was plenty easy to see bullet holes.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6285850 05/04/16 01:55 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
Seating depth can be super crucial depending on if the bullet needs that specific sweet spot. I always find my charge weight then fine tune with different seating depths. It's how I started and how I still do it to this day.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: jeff1383] #6285926 05/04/16 02:25 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,173
As is the usual process for most of us.

The point I was making is that we shot very few rounds, and did not jump the bullets near as large as twenty thousandth increments.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6286006 05/04/16 03:03 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Are the 6.5 Berger Hybrids only available in 130 grain? It's the Tactical OTM bullets, correct?

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6286024 05/04/16 03:10 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
Originally Posted By: Big Stan
Are the 6.5 Berger Hybrids only available in 130 grain? It's the Tactical OTM bullets, correct?

No there's a 140 hybrid and a 130 otm hybrid. 2800 fps range seems to be the ticket for the 140s. Some guys reporting accuracy with the 130s at a tad over 3000 fps. 2840-2950 is the norm for velocity I've seen for the 130s.

Last edited by jeff1383; 05/04/16 03:14 AM.
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: J.G.] #6286025 05/04/16 03:11 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
As is the usual process for most of us.

The point I was making is that we shot very few rounds, and did not jump the bullets near as large as twenty thousandth increments.


True dat woot

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: jeff1383] #6286036 05/04/16 03:15 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Originally Posted By: jeff1383
Originally Posted By: Big Stan
Are the 6.5 Berger Hybrids only available in 130 grain? It's the Tactical OTM bullets, correct?

No there's a 140 hybrid and a 130 otm hybrid. 2800 fps range seems to be the ticket for the 140s. Some guys reporting accuracy with the 130s at a tad over 3000 fps. 2840-2950 is the norm for velocity I've seen for the 130s.

Right, but I was looking for 130 Hybrids only. Are you referring the velocity to the 6.5 Creedmore or 6.5 x 284?


Last edited by Big Stan; 05/04/16 03:16 AM.
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6286042 05/04/16 03:18 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
Originally Posted By: Big Stan
Originally Posted By: jeff1383
Originally Posted By: Big Stan
Are the 6.5 Berger Hybrids only available in 130 grain? It's the Tactical OTM bullets, correct?

No there's a 140 hybrid and a 130 otm hybrid. 2800 fps range seems to be the ticket for the 140s. Some guys reporting accuracy with the 130s at a tad over 3000 fps. 2840-2950 is the norm for velocity I've seen for the 130s.

Right, but I was looking for 130 Hybrids only. Are you referring the velocity to the 6.5 Creedmore or 6.5 x 284?


The 130 otm hybrid is the bullet I'm referring to. It's the only one as far as the hybrid design in that bullet weight class of 130. I'm referring to 6.5 creedmoor not x284.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6286052 05/04/16 03:23 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899

From another website. I DON'T advise to do that without safely working up. I'm at 43.3 and getting 2922 fps avg. On my 4th firing of the same lot of hornady brass and the primer pockets are still tight.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: jeff1383] #6286054 05/04/16 03:24 AM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Originally Posted By: jeff1383
Originally Posted By: Big Stan
Originally Posted By: jeff1383
Originally Posted By: Big Stan
Are the 6.5 Berger Hybrids only available in 130 grain? It's the Tactical OTM bullets, correct?

No there's a 140 hybrid and a 130 otm hybrid. 2800 fps range seems to be the ticket for the 140s. Some guys reporting accuracy with the 130s at a tad over 3000 fps. 2840-2950 is the norm for velocity I've seen for the 130s.

Right, but I was looking for 130 Hybrids only. Are you referring the velocity to the 6.5 Creedmore or 6.5 x 284?


The 130 otm hybrid is the bullet I'm referring to. It's the only one as far as the hybrid design in that bullet weight class of 130. I'm referring to 6.5 creedmoor not x284.


I heard most of the tournament shooters are winning with the 130's.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6286066 05/04/16 03:30 AM
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
J
jeff1383 Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
J
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 899
Not sure if they are or not. I don't have enough $ or free time to even start to compete with those class of shooters. You should try 140 hybrids or 130s. Let your rifle tell you what it likes.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6286214 05/04/16 11:32 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
D
dee Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 6,219
A lot of guys in PRS run a 140 hybrid toned down to the 2750fps range. Speed is fine and great but comes with higher pressure which can be a issue in damp conditions or after a high shot count fast string.


"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6286547 05/04/16 03:02 PM
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
T
TackDriver Offline OP
Pro Tracker
OP Offline
Pro Tracker
T
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,100
Ordered both Hybrids, thanks guys. Still waiting for the rings for the Creedmore. I'll work up some handloads and see how it does.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6286734 05/04/16 04:58 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 390
O
okierifleman Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
O
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 390
I am shooting 140 Hybrids at the lands out of my 6.5-284 at about 2975.

Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: J.G.] #6286764 05/04/16 05:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,252
J
Judd Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Online Confused
#1 Creedmoor Fan
J
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,252
Originally Posted By: FiremanJG
Funny you mention that. Judd taught me something about a month ago.

We had found "the powder charge". I got behind his rifle while he loaded ammo. I shot two rounds with the bullet even with the lands. I told him the spread in Mils. He jumped them .003", and loaded two. I shot those two, and reported the spread. Moved on with more of a jump, and we repeated. We carried on for several seating depth tests with only two shots. Then it tightened up. He noted the jump, and we carried on. It never got better, so we went back to that specific jump and he loaded me three. I shot that group, and it was pretty darn good. We did all this at 200 yards where it was plenty easy to see bullet holes.


Dude...don't give all my secrets away...especially to the non-paying customers grin

I'm kidding but JG is right, that is how I test seating depth...a Wilson seating die and arbor press make this much easier to do at the range. In my experience you get a more consistent OAL too...keep in mind much like regular seating dies you will need what Wilson calls a "swift" stem for hybrid or VLD bullets...otherwise you'll get a real nice ring around them at the top.


Originally Posted by Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
Re: Hybrid vs VLD [Re: TackDriver] #6289610 05/06/16 05:38 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 351
I
ImBillT Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
I
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 351
I was in a hurry go hog hunting and try some 185 VLD's. I just loaded them to mag length in my FTR rifle and checked sight-in. I figured I would go through Berger's recommended seating depth process later. The darn thing shot as good or better than when they were jammed. VLD's may always shoot well jammed and may sometimes need adjustment to shoot jumped, but they can definitely be made to shoot when jumping, and in my case, they went straight to shooting

Page 2 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3