Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
19car69, Brittanypointer, BBRANDL, AHAB, StevenAg03
63591 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 86977
stxranchman 52559
bill oxner 46109
RWH24 44568
rifleman 44356
BOBO the Clown 43459
BMD 40834
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 35148
SnakeWrangler 34883
facebook
Forum Stats
63591 Members
45 Forums
450990 Topics
6231620 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
#6253661 - 04/09/16 07:09 PM GP100 vs S&W 686
Palehorse Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 10/22/07
Posts: 4618
Loc: Surfside Beach, TX
Ok, I'm jonesin bad for a new revolver. I've narrowed it down to either a Ruger GP100 .357 w/ 4" barrel or a S&W 686, also .357 w/ 4" barrel. The S&W is about $200 dollars more. Do yall think the S&W is worth the extra $$$$?
_________________________
“He grouped his last five shots right in the center of the bull’s-eye. Then I showed him my technique of scattering shots randomly around the target because, as I explained, you never know which way the deer might jump just as you pull the trigger.”

Top
#6253720 - 04/09/16 07:41 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
Nighteagle Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 11/17/12
Posts: 348
Loc: burleson, tx
I'm a fan of the gp 100. It fits my hand better than the 686.

Top
#6253879 - 04/09/16 09:38 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
Big Fitz Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 12/06/09
Posts: 2411
Loc: Prosper, TX
I personally think the 686 is the best 357 mag revolver that has ever been made.
_________________________
Originally Posted By: syncerus
I prefer to think of myself as a control enthusiast. wink

Top
#6253889 - 04/09/16 09:50 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
RiverRider Online   content
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 11/11/07
Posts: 7971
Loc: Wise Co.
I think S&W is a finer revolver, but the Ruger is likely tougher (and not a bad gun by any stretch!). Whether it's $200 worth of finer or not is something only you can decide. I think I'd rather have the Smith, though.
_________________________


I'm here to give and receive knowledge, not affirmation or adoration. If you don't like it, mierda dura. Intellectual honesty is not for fragile egos.

Top
#6253898 - 04/09/16 09:57 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
tth_40 Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 04/05/10
Posts: 14050
Loc: North Texas.
I've always liked the GP100.

Don't have one at the moment, though I do have a vintage Security Six. Great revolver, built like a tank.
_________________________
Originally Posted By: theserxtremedays
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

Top
#6253907 - 04/09/16 10:05 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
KC Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 09/29/08
Posts: 16484
Loc: Hunt County
686 was the first gun I ever bought. Couldn't even guess how many thousands of rounds has gone through it, and it's still like a Swiss watch.

That being said I wouldn't pay $200 more for it though. Ruger revolvers are simple and tough. Reminds me of the quote "perfection is achieved not when there is nothing left to add, but rather nothing left to take away."

Top
#6253908 - 04/09/16 10:05 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
QuitShootinYoungBucks Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 11/01/12
Posts: 8775
Loc: Lubbock, TX
If I liked them both, I'd save the $200
_________________________

Top
#6253992 - 04/10/16 12:17 AM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
blackcoal Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 01/19/12
Posts: 9209
Loc: 60 Mi North of DFW
I have both the GP100 and the 686. Both are earlier non-locking models. Out of the box the 686 was smoother, both in single and double action. However, with a little simple work the GP100 can rival the 686 in the action area. The plus of the GP100 is that it is much easier to disassemble to its basic parts and easier to clean. That is about all I can say, in my opinion the only way to test for accuracy would be with a Ransom Rest which I no longer have. I can't imagine anyone loading up the 357 mag to such stout loads that "built like tank" would matter, both of these wheelguns are solid.
_________________________
The Greatest Enemy of knowledge is not ignorance,
it is the illusion of knowledge.--Stephen Hawking

Top
#6254190 - 04/10/16 09:22 AM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
z71dustin Online   content
THF Celebrity

Registered: 10/27/09
Posts: 11551
I've had a GP100 for 7 years now and I love it. It fits my hand perfectly and is very accurate.

Top
#6254243 - 04/10/16 10:41 AM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
Palehorse Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 10/22/07
Posts: 4618
Loc: Surfside Beach, TX
After some research, I've decided to get the Ruger. The main reason is the point that Blackcoal brought up, it is much easier to break down for cleaning and maintenance/repair. I like that. Any money I save on the purchace, I'll put into a trigger job if I find that I don't like it.
Thanks guys!
_________________________
“He grouped his last five shots right in the center of the bull’s-eye. Then I showed him my technique of scattering shots randomly around the target because, as I explained, you never know which way the deer might jump just as you pull the trigger.”

Top
#6254319 - 04/10/16 11:40 AM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
Red Cloud Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 09/04/09
Posts: 1941
Loc: Weatherford, Texas
I'm late to this party (story of my life) but for what it's worth the S&W 686 is one of the best .357 revolvers ever made. Operationally smooth, excellent balance and rugged.

Top
#6254336 - 04/10/16 11:54 AM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Red Cloud]
sig226fan (Rguns.com) Offline
duck & cover

Registered: 11/21/05
Posts: 31611
Loc: Hickory Creek, Fannin Co. Texa...
Originally Posted By: Red Cloud
I'm late to this party (story of my life) but for what it's worth the S&W 686 is one of the best .357 revolvers ever made. Operationally smooth, excellent balance and rugged.


I don't think that's even close. I understand adding the cost into it changes it for a lot of people, but the gun its the 686 is far and away a better gun.

That said, the very first 686's had a extractor issue, which smith worked hard to correct and replace on every one of them, if it was a used early serial number gun, I'd research that.

Top
#6254484 - 04/10/16 02:44 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
texasdude28 Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 06/12/11
Posts: 2917
Loc: Clairette
Several years ago I was in the same situation, went to a gun store, held them, carried them, really spent time with both. Ended up getting the Ruger for the lower price and because Smith refused to send me a brochure and catalog after I requested one. Still have the GP and am glad I bought it.

Top
#6254565 - 04/10/16 04:32 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
beatarmy Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 10/01/09
Posts: 373
Loc: dallas
Rugersupposedly hold up better with hot & heavy loads. Smiths supposedly have better out of the box triggers. I have a gp-100 because I wanted ammo versatility.

Top
#6254772 - 04/10/16 08:10 PM Re: GP100 vs S&W 686 [Re: Palehorse]
patriot07 Online   content
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 11/06/11
Posts: 2371
Loc: Royse City, TX
I'd save the $200. They're both great guns. Ruger fits me better.

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



© 2004-2018 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide