texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Josh-04512, dblmikeusa1, Hog-Pro, 4Notch, Niknoc76
72042 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,517
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,848
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,785
Posts9,729,129
Members87,042
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: Regular Guy] #6114327 01/02/16 10:27 AM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
HWY_MAN Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 31,055
Originally Posted By: Regular Guy
Originally Posted By: Sneaky
Originally Posted By: HWY_MAN
Originally Posted By: Sneaky
Americans have been slow to catch on to the 6.5. Thankfully, that is changing.



I was shooting a 6.5-284 40 years ago. Hell the 6.5-300 Weatherbys been around longer than that. It was originally called the 6.5-Weatherby Wright Magnum. 6.5-280 was another popular round, oh and don't forget the 6.5 Remington Magnum that was a newby in the early 60's.


They've been around. They just haven't been near as popular as others until recent.


The Swedish military have been shooting heavy for caliber, high bc 6.5 mm bullets out of fast twist barrels since the late 1800's. We caught on last


And so were we with the 220 grain in the 30 US. Then dropped to the 150 in 06 and eventually to 30 M1 Ball 174 grain spitzer boat tail in 1926 and again in 1936 switching back to a 154 spitzer flat base The little Swede didn't switch to the 140 grain Spitzer Boat tail until 1941.


Yes! A Weatherby does kill them deader.
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: RiverRider] #6114388 01/02/16 01:27 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 255
R
Regular Guy Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
R
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 255
Originally Posted By: RiverRider
Originally Posted By: Regular Guy


They understood ballistic coefficients as well. Just because they weren't shooting boattails yet, doesn't mean they were clueless. Whether it was accidental or not, they beat us to it and they ran with it. They continued shooting long, heavy bullets long after the advent of modern gunpowder.

Edit- and compared to bullets of the day, it had very good ballistics.

Edit again- and it wasn't a black powder cartridge


Okay, so it wasn't black powder, my chronological error...it was very early on in the smokeless era and powder selection was not a concept at the time and heavy bullets were still the trend because of the limitations of black powder. To say that they were all about BC back then is completely ridiculous. Sectional density for penetration's sake, maybe. But not BC.

Looks like "BC-on-the-brain" is in full epidemic mode.


Not all about BC. But the 6.5x55 swede was and is still ballistically superior to even a lot of modern catridges. Compare muzzle endrgy to snergy at 1,000 yards of the swede, it actually catches up to within around ten percent of most magnums, and the trajectory does too. With little recoil.
I didnt even know the 6.5 swede existed until maybe a year or a and a half ago. Someone I worked for and trusted turned me on to it, because i was looking for an adequate deer rifle around $200. I never found a swedish mauser, but I saw the ruger american for $180 and pounced.
Anyway dude wasca swedish mauser fanboy, he said he pulled his,out from under his bed after ten years and ringing steel at 600 without touching the sights. Dude was an 18B and knew a thing or two about guns.
The swedes were not "all about bc" BUT they knew they were onto something with a bullet that has less recoil but hits as hard at long range. Otherwise why would they have experimented and settled during a time almost all the rest of the world shot 30 cal?

Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6114400 01/02/16 01:40 PM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,946
B
Buzzsaw Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
B
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 33,946
Seems like the up-swing for the 6.5, other than the LR Benchrest guys with their 6.5X284's and 6.5X47's, started when GA Precision started shooting sniper matches with the .243 105gr bullets, they weren't quite good enough, so they tried the .260, it took off followed by the 6.5 Creedmoor with all the marketing and Hype by the boys at Ruger & Hornady brought to its place at the top as "the caliber" to have now.

Then GA Precision came out with their 6.5 SAUM which lit a few pants on fire but has since faded. I ate the bait when I watched Brush Country Monsters TV Show and saw the McWhorter Rifle boys shooting deer a long way off with their 6.5 Weatherby Magnums & Berger 140gr VLD, so I jumped on that band wagon.

I guess my point is, these are ALL, GREAT cartridges, are some a tiny bit better? Sure, do the ALL get the job done? Sure.

As it always goes on this forum, everyone LOVES what they have because they have a Chit load of money invested and have to justify it. That's what there are SO many choices and thank God there are all these choices.

So, it don't make a hill of beans if you like Tikka, Swarovski, Mils or MOA, Dialing or holding off, Vortex, BSA, Weatherby, Winchester, Yada, Yada, Yada, if you got it and like it then God Bless.

So can this thread be left alone to die now? cheerleader

Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: Buzzsaw] #6114413 01/02/16 01:50 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
T
TFF Caribou Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
T
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 4,436
Originally Posted By: Buzzsaw
Seems like the up-swing for the 6.5, other than the LR Benchrest guys with their 6.5X284's and 6.5X47's, started when GA Precision started shooting sniper matches with the .243 105gr bullets, they weren't quite good enough, so they tried the .260, it took off followed by the 6.5 Creedmoor with all the marketing and Hype by the boys at Ruger & Hornady brought to its place at the top as "the caliber" to have now.

Then GA Precision came out with their 6.5 SAUM which lit a few pants on fire but has since faded. I ate the bait when I watched Brush Country Monsters TV Show and saw the McWhorter Rifle boys shooting deer a long way off with their 6.5 Weatherby Magnums & Berger 140gr VLD, so I jumped on that band wagon.

I guess my point is, these are ALL, GREAT cartridges, are some a tiny bit better? Sure, do the ALL get the job done? Sure.

As it always goes on this forum, everyone LOVES what they have because they have a Chit load of money invested and have to justify it. That's what there are SO many choices and thank God there are all these choices.

So, it don't make a hill of beans if you like Tikka, Swarovski, Mils or MOA, Dialing or holding off, Vortex, BSA, Weatherby, Winchester, Yada, Yada, Yada, if you got it and like it then God Bless.

So can this thread be left alone to die now? cheerleader


I don't think it can...

Since nobody mentioned how the .250 Savage is truly the greatest of all.


The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference. -George Washington
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6114530 01/02/16 03:25 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,954
H
huntwest Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
H
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,954
I am very biased as I have worked for Weatherby since 1995. So I'll just add this.
You don't hear of many people shooting at 600 yards with a Weatherby because the majority of people that own them only hunt with them and are not target shooters.
Does it the help the guy that doesn't shoot a whole lot but hunts a lot? Yes a little, especially out to 400 yards. With a little studying a person and sight in correctly and kill a deer size target with ease out to those ranges. That covers the bulk of deer and elk hunting. I know this is true for most all calibers but the extra speed does help in the wind and being a little flatter is an advantage to the common guy. The added velocity at longer shots also delivers more pounds of energy.
Are Weatherby calibers faster and shoot flatter than others without reloading. Yes with a few exceptions.
Are there people that shoot Weatherby calibers past 600?
Yes lots. I know of two shooting schools that Include a Weatherby 30-378 with a custom scope in the price of their school. The schools specialize in teaching 1000 yard shooting. They sell around 700 packages a year at each school so I know 1400 people a year learn to shoot at 1000 yards with a Weatherby caliber.
The comments that a Weatherby thread always get my attention. As they say there ain't no such thing as bad advertising as long as people are talking about it.
Everyone deserves their opinion and thankfully 60k people thought Weatherby was the gun to buy last year!
By the way I follow and read the stuff JG and Chad do pretty close. I appreciate it all and wish I had the time to do the stuff these guys do.
Happy New Year Guys

Last edited by huntwest; 01/02/16 04:06 PM.
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: huntwest] #6114655 01/02/16 04:58 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 255
R
Regular Guy Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
R
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 255
Originally Posted By: huntwest
I am very biased as I have worked for Weatherby since 1995. So I'll just add this.
You don't hear of many people shooting at 600 yards with a Weatherby because the majority of people that own them only hunt with them and are not target shooters.
Does it the help the guy that doesn't shoot a whole lot but hunts a lot? Yes a little, especially out to 400 yards. With a little studying a person and sight in correctly and kill a deer size target with ease out to those ranges. That covers the bulk of deer and elk hunting. I know this is true for most all calibers but the extra speed does help in the wind and being a little flatter is an advantage to the common guy. The added velocity at longer shots also delivers more pounds of energy.
Are Weatherby calibers faster and shoot flatter than others without reloading. Yes with a few exceptions.
Are there people that shoot Weatherby calibers past 600?
Yes lots. I know of two shooting schools that Include a Weatherby 30-378 with a custom scope in the price of their school. The schools specialize in teaching 1000 yard shooting. They sell around 700 packages a year at each school so I know 1400 people a year learn to shoot at 1000 yards with a Weatherby caliber.
The comments that a Weatherby thread always get my attention. As they say there ain't no such thing as bad advertising as long as people are talking about it.
Everyone deserves their opinion and thankfully 60k people thought Weatherby was the gun to buy last year!
By the way I follow and read the stuff JG and Chad do pretty close. I appreciate it all and wish I had the time to do the stuff these guys do.
Happy New Year Guys


cheers

Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6114812 01/02/16 06:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,517
R
RiverRider Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,517
There are lots of cartridges to choose from out there, and there are a lot of different folks out there choosing them based on some pretty unique outlooks and purposes. Each and every cartridge is a compromise in some respect, so it has to come down to what appeals to the guy who's looking at them. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

An example...I have absolutely NO interest in the .300 Blackout. It seems silly to me. Other guys look at it and their hearts throb. They have their reasons for loving it and I have my own reasons for not ever glancing at it ever again. I don't see any point in feuding over such things or trying to push beliefs off on others.


[Linked Image]

"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty."

-Augustus McRae
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: RiverRider] #6114855 01/02/16 07:21 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
T
tth_40 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
Originally Posted By: RiverRider
There are lots of cartridges to choose from out there, and there are a lot of different folks out there choosing them based on some pretty unique outlooks and purposes. Each and every cartridge is a compromise in some respect, so it has to come down to what appeals to the guy who's looking at them. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

An example...I have absolutely NO interest in the .300 Blackout. It seems silly to me. Other guys look at it and their hearts throb. They have their reasons for loving it and I have my own reasons for not ever glancing at it ever again. I don't see any point in feuding over such things or trying to push beliefs off on others.


+1. cheers

Call me boring, but to me one of my "exotic" cartridges is the .270 Winchester. I just recently (last 5 years) started playing with and handloading for it. I've taken one decent buck, a few hogs and quite a few raccons with it. I normally stick with the .30-06, I have a fickle but interesting relationship with the .300 Savage and I really like the 7mm-08 too. I'm sure if I had a rifle in .257 Weatherby I'd be fascinated with it as well.

To me it's a personal preference thing. I really don't think there's a wrong answer.


Originally Posted By: theserxtremedays
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: RiverRider] #6114869 01/02/16 07:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
B
bo3 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
Originally Posted By: RiverRider
There are lots of cartridges to choose from out there, and there are a lot of different folks out there choosing them based on some pretty unique outlooks and purposes. Each and every cartridge is a compromise in some respect, so it has to come down to what appeals to the guy who's looking at them. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

An example...I have absolutely NO interest in the .300 Blackout. It seems silly to me. Other guys look at it and their hearts throb. They have their reasons for loving it and I have my own reasons for not ever glancing at it ever again. I don't see any point in feuding over such things or trying to push beliefs off on others.


cheers
My only problem is I sometimes can't help but to respond to statements made out if ignorance.

Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6114890 01/02/16 07:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
P
postoak Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
P
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
Why compare the .257 WBY to the .270? It would make more sense to compare it to the .25-06. From the charts I consulted:

257 - 120 gr. 3305 fps

.25-06 - 120 gr. 2990 fps


Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6114937 01/02/16 08:40 PM
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,694
6
603Country Online Content OP
THF Celebrity
OP Online Content
THF Celebrity
6
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 15,694
Post oak, that's probably true if it was a 25 caliber comparison. It's just that I was intrigued by that new 110 gr Accubond for the 270. At 3500 fps, it's a bullet I'd consider using, in that it's supposedly tougher than a Ballistic Tip. It should work quite well. While I was wishing that they made a 110 Accubond in 26 caliber, I had a look at what other cartridges would do with a 110 gr bullet. I found that the 257 Wby had that available, and that the MV was about the same. Very interesting. I then assumed that the trajectory would favor the Wby, and it did, but not enough to matter at all. Also very interesting. Then I started this chat. I probably could have done a better job with the chat and not irritated the Wby guys. I underestimated their loyalty to the round.

Anyhoo, the 270 has a new option, with a fast bullet that should have the accuracy of the Ballistic Tip but be tougher than the BT, which would be good at the higher velocity.


Not my monkeys, not my circus...
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6114958 01/02/16 08:58 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
B
bo3 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
Is the 270 110 accubond designed for 270 speeds or for a 6.8?

Last edited by bo323; 01/02/16 08:59 PM.
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: bo3] #6114974 01/02/16 09:09 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,831
D
Drop Tine Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
D
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,831
Originally Posted By: bo323
Is the 270 110 accubond designed for 270 speeds or for a 6.8?


All accubonds are designed for 3200 fps are less....but I'm sure if shooting lungs, it would be fine on deer


[Linked Image]
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6115012 01/02/16 09:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 97
Sled2live Offline
Outdoorsman
Offline
Outdoorsman
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 97
I want to thank the Original Poster for bringing this information about the 110 Accubond to the forum. I was feeling sorry for myself for giving my 25-06 (in a Weatherby by the way) to my daughter so I replaced it with a 270 (in a Winchester). A bonded bullet should hold together well on game at the uber velocities anticipated. So I am feeling much better now...maybe I didn't need to get the 28 inch barreled version. :-)

Again, thanks for the heads-up.

Scott

Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6115024 01/02/16 09:58 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,517
R
RiverRider Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,517
Nosler's website says the Accubond has no limit for maximum velocity. The hunting BT is rated to 3200 fps.


[Linked Image]

"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty."

-Augustus McRae
Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6116018 01/03/16 03:01 PM
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,900
J
JJH Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
J
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,900
Just another option, if you are concerned about the ABs at that velocity. . Barnes makes a 110gr TTSX that works very well at 3400fps on WTs. Ask me how I know 😀

Re: 270 Win vs 257 Wby [Re: 603Country] #6116059 01/03/16 03:35 PM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,484
kmon11 Offline
junior
Offline
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,484
Accubonds and partitions will work fine at that velocity.


lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true
Mainstream news might be fun to watch
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3