Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
BigHit, Sifat, TJWatkins, Jlivi1224, 65chevy
60473 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 77465
stxranchman 52092
RWH24 44568
rifleman 43786
BOBO the Clown 41117
BMD 40539
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 33685
bill oxner 32656
sig226fan (Rguns.com) 30571
facebook
Forum Stats
60473 Members
45 Forums
476079 Topics
6245201 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Topic Options
#5881370 - 08/16/15 05:10 PM zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44?
caddokiller Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 09/25/06
Posts: 5414
Loc: midlothian texas
Putting this on a 280ai hunting rifle and I am down to these 2 choices. Any opinions?
_________________________
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.- Thomas jefferson

Top
#5881527 - 08/16/15 07:04 PM Re: zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44? [Re: caddokiller]
Brother in-law Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 07/08/07
Posts: 24481
I would take the leupold due to size weight and warranty. Vx3 glass is nice and for a true hunting gun it would be great. You sure it's not a 40 or 50 mm obj?

Top
#5882083 - 08/17/15 07:04 AM Re: zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44? [Re: caddokiller]
Precision_Shooter Online   content


Registered: 02/18/09
Posts: 826
Loc: Crossroads, TX
VX6 3-18 would be even better, but of those two, I would take the VX3...
_________________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776

Top
#5882520 - 08/17/15 12:15 PM Re: zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44? [Re: Precision_Shooter]
caddokiller Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 09/25/06
Posts: 5414
Loc: midlothian texas
Originally Posted By: Precision_Shooter
VX6 3-18 would be even better, but of those two, I would take the VX3...


If I was going to spend 1k or more on a scope it would be a Swarovski over a leupold everyday.


I went to SWFA and looked at scopes this morning and I had to rule out the leupold. That tiny field of view they have just drives me crazy. ZCame home and ordered the zeiss from euro optics. Thanks for the advise guys
_________________________
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.- Thomas jefferson

Top
#5882593 - 08/17/15 12:57 PM Re: zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44? [Re: caddokiller]
Precision_Shooter Online   content


Registered: 02/18/09
Posts: 826
Loc: Crossroads, TX
You're crazy if you think a Swarovski Z6i 3-18x50 is $2,000 better than the Leupold VX6...Even the non illuminated Z6 is $1,000 more than the VX6... The swaro may have an ever so slight optical quality advantage but it's certainly not $1k-$2k better...and you didn't like how small the FOV on the VX3 is, the VX6 is twice the FOV of the Swaro Z6...

Swarovski:
3-18x50, 30mm tube
$3,300
6.6ft field of view @ 100yds
Illuminated reticle

Leupold VX6:
3-18x50, 30mm tube
$1,300
13.7ft field of view at 100yds
Illuminated reticle


Edited by Precision_Shooter (08/17/15 12:58 PM)
_________________________
"Laws that forbid the carrying of arms disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants." - Thomas Jefferson, 1776

Top
#5882827 - 08/17/15 03:07 PM Re: zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44? [Re: Precision_Shooter]
caddokiller Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 09/25/06
Posts: 5414
Loc: midlothian texas
[quote=Precision_Shooter]You're crazy if you think a Swarovski Z6i 3-18x50 is $2,000 better than the Leupold VX6...Even the non illuminated Z6 is $1,000 more than the VX6... The swaro may have an ever so slight optical quality advantage but it's certainly not $1k-$2k better...and you didn't like how small the FOV on the VX3 is, the VX6 is twice the FOV of the Swarovski[quote=precision-shooter]


Actually according to leupolds website...

Leupold VX6:
3-18x50, 30 MM tube
$1624
38 feet at 3 power and 7feet at 18 power
Don't care about the illuminated reticle
21oz

Swarovski z5: ( which is what I was comparing it to in my post)
3.5-18x44 1 in tube
$1547
35.5ft at 3.5 to 6ft at 18 power
Don't need or want a illuminated reticle
16oz


So it has about the same field of view as the vx6, weighs 6 ounces less and has FAR superior glass. I can count points on a buck at dark at 10 power where I would need 12 or 14 to count them with the leupold. Yes I have owned one. So that basically makes the swaro have a GREATER actual field of view. If you disagree that's fine. Maybe your eyes are different. Or maybe your just CRAZY.
_________________________
The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.- Thomas jefferson

Top
#5901902 - 08/28/15 10:25 PM Re: zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44? [Re: caddokiller]
Temple Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 11/15/12
Posts: 388
Loc: Nixa, Missouri
I have had both of the scopes and the Zeiss was brighter and had a better fov. For my eyes it was a simple decision, Zeiss.

Top
#5914082 - 09/05/15 02:41 AM Re: zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44? [Re: caddokiller]
booradley Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 01/20/11
Posts: 1692
Loc: Justin, TX
I like the VX-3 and have two. In low light the Zeiss will blow them out of the water in my experience.
_________________________
I joined the circus to become a clown fighter. I now know 46 different ways to kill a clown.

Top
#5914141 - 09/05/15 07:33 AM Re: zeiss HD 5 3-15x42 or Leupold vx-3 4.5-14x44? [Re: caddokiller]
RHutch Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 05/25/13
Posts: 317
Loc: Frisco
Zeiss would be my choice of these two.
The FOV in the 14x Leupold is terrible. Always has been no matter the model.

Top



© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide