Not all deer at the facility have been killed nor should all be killed per their own regulations, and that's why they haven't killed all the deer.

If you want to argue with TAHC go right a head, TPWD tried and so far has lost

And you conveniently keep dodging the questions. Again, what state has CWD in pens and not in the wild population???

And again, I'd have died 3 or 4 times if I'd have been holding my breath for your answer.

But really, if you're all that smart (being a Dr. and all) you ought to be able to answer a simple question before I suffocate.

I already explained why in the thread on that topic. Go read it instead of contaminating this one.

I was just ignoring you because you're annoying. Do you think that CWD being in high fence properties and also in free range populations within a state, or vice versa, supports your argument in any way? It doesn't. Are you trying to somehow insinuate that it is the free range population that is bringing cwd to the hf properties? How are they bringing the disease inside the fence?? When you look at a multi-state jump, when the disease spontaneously shows up hundreds of miles away without any cases in between, it is far more likely that the cause is the transportation of infected deer by man, who then escape or are released into the wild population where they are able to physically interact with those deer and spread the disease.

Or maybe you were trying to say CWD can't be controlled in hf and that's why it's also in the wild population in those states? If CWD deer are released or escape from the ranch before they are managed for cwd in confinement, then you can't apply that argument.

Either way, the correlation of cwd in both hf properties and wild populations, isn't significant to your argument.