texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
Josh-04512, dblmikeusa1, Hog-Pro, 4Notch, Niknoc76
72042 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,517
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,848
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,783
Posts9,729,086
Members87,042
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Ruger vs Remington #5798251 06/21/15 01:00 AM
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,240
E
Erny Online Content OP
Extreme Tracker
OP Online Content
Extreme Tracker
E
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,240
I am looking at replacing my current 300 mag for another on in a Remington 700 XCR or the Ruger magnum. Both are stainless and are very similarly priced. I am leaning toward the Remington because that is what I have now and I am used to it. I have hunted with the Ruger (bowwrowed from outfitter) and liked it. But the safety system is a little awkward, at least to me. Any one have any cheers or jeers for either one?

Last edited by Erny; 06/21/15 01:06 AM.
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798284 06/21/15 01:14 AM
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,081
E
Elkhunter49 Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
E
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,081
I've got a Remington model 700 Stainless Synthetic that I've had for many years, it's a great rifle that I've taken animals with from 11,500 ft to sea level. Great rifle, Baker


A true friend reaches for your hand but touches your heart.
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798293 06/21/15 01:18 AM
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,174
T
Tactical Cowboy Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
T
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,174
Remington.


The secret to a long life is to try not to shorten it.
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798323 06/21/15 01:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,503
syncerus Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,503
I'd buy the one that fit me best.


NRA Patriot Benefactor & DSC Lifer
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Tactical Cowboy] #5798333 06/21/15 02:01 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 505
C
conifer Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
C
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 505
Originally Posted By: Tactical Cowboy
Remington.


X2

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798385 06/21/15 02:57 AM
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,101
C
Colt W. Knight Offline
Veteran Tracker
Offline
Veteran Tracker
C
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,101
A 700 with a Timney trigger is a thing of beauty. Never really been a fan of Ruger rifles.

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Colt W. Knight] #5798393 06/21/15 03:01 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,160
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,160
Originally Posted By: Colt W. Knight
A 700 with a Timney trigger is a thing of beauty. Never really been a fan of Ruger rifles.


My sentiments as well.

Or skip both brands and buy a Tikka. Better action, great factory trigger, will shoot just as well, or better, than the Ruger or Rem.


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798406 06/21/15 03:15 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,842
D
DannyB Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,842
I trade around a lot, so I have had a lot of both in the OP. All I will say now is that our Sako A7 won't be traded.

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798412 06/21/15 03:23 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,499
C
charlesb Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,499
Well, bringing up a Sako in a discussion about "Ruger or Remington?" is like bringing up a Mercedes in a discussion about Korean econo-boxes.

I avoid Remingtons as there have been way too many QC issues with the company lately. - You don't know what you are going to get. Rugers are good rifles, finally past the barrel problems that they were famous for in years past. Tikkas are good for longer cartridges, but unnecessarily heavy for compact rounds.

If I were shopping for a new rifle today, it would be a toss-up between a Browning X-bolt, and a Weatherby Vanguard.

If I were choosing between a new Remington and a new Ruger, it would take me only a millisecond to go for the Ruger. It's twice the rifle for about the same money.

- But that's just me.

Last edited by charlesb; 06/21/15 03:28 AM.

Kind regards, charlesb


Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798450 06/21/15 03:52 AM
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,484
kmon11 Online Shocked
junior
Online Shocked
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,484
Will take Ruger over Remington any day unless going to spend a bunch extra with the gunsmith.

Give me a Tikka over Ruger or Remington anyday and twice on Sunday grin


lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true
Mainstream news might be fun to watch
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798452 06/21/15 03:53 AM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,382
N
nsmike Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
N
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,382
I think you answered your own question when you said you find the Ruger safety clumsy.


for every stereotype there's a prototype don't be the prototype
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: charlesb] #5798520 06/21/15 05:17 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,842
D
DannyB Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,842
Originally Posted By: charlesb
Well, bringing up a Sako in a discussion about "Ruger or Remington?" is like bringing up a Mercedes in a discussion about Korean econo-boxes.

I avoid Remingtons as there have been way too many QC issues with the company lately. - You don't know what you are going to get. Rugers are good rifles, finally past the barrel problems that they were famous for in years past. Tikkas are good for longer cartridges, but unnecessarily heavy for compact rounds.

If I were shopping for a new rifle today, it would be a toss-up between a Browning X-bolt, and a Weatherby Vanguard.

If I were choosing between a new Remington and a new Ruger, it would take me only a millisecond to go for the Ruger. It's twice the rifle for about the same money.

- But that's just me.


I do not whatsoever claim to be a Sako expert. As a matter of fact when I bought the A7 I viewd it as their bottom of the line of Sakos, kind of like a Remington 710.

However their bottom of the line gun, that isn't much more expensive than the oringal OP's selections, isn't that much more expensive. And I think they guarantee either 3 or 5 shots in an inch at 100 yards with factory ammo.

To me that does two things, 1. it gives a gun that is a better gun than I am a shooter. And 2. I don't have to reload the ammo for that particular cartridge.

And if you saw my Glock 41 trade offer a Vanguard is in the hunt. I should have added the Tikka to that offer.

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: DannyB] #5798524 06/21/15 05:21 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,842
D
DannyB Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
D
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 10,842
Originally Posted By: DannyB
Originally Posted By: charlesb
Well, bringing up a Sako in a discussion about "Ruger or Remington?" is like bringing up a Mercedes in a discussion about Korean econo-boxes.

I avoid Remingtons as there have been way too many QC issues with the company lately. - You don't know what you are going to get. Rugers are good rifles, finally past the barrel problems that they were famous for in years past. Tikkas are good for longer cartridges, but unnecessarily heavy for compact rounds.

If I were shopping for a new rifle today, it would be a toss-up between a Browning X-bolt, and a Weatherby Vanguard.

If I were choosing between a new Remington and a new Ruger, it would take me only a millisecond to go for the Ruger. It's twice the rifle for about the same money.

- But that's just me.


I do not whatsoever claim to be a Sako expert. As a matter of fact when I bought the A7 I viewd it as their bottom of the line of Sakos, kind of like a Remington 710.

However their bottom of the line gun, that isn't much more expensive than the oringal OP's selections, isn't that much more expensive. And I think they guarantee either 3 or 5 shots in an inch at 100 yards with factory ammo.

To me that does two things, 1. it gives a gun that is a better gun than I am a shooter. And 2. I don't have to reload the ammo for that particular cartridge.

And if you saw my Glock 41 trade offer a Vanguard is in the hunt. I should have added the Tikka and X-Bolt to that offer.

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798527 06/21/15 05:41 AM
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,935
B
bigjoe8565 Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
B
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 7,935
Remington with s Timmey trigger as others have suggested.

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798529 06/21/15 05:45 AM
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,539
O
okstatefan Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,539
Why not just a Savage model 10 or 12?

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: okstatefan] #5798551 06/21/15 10:11 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,408
H
Huntmaster Online Content
Veteran Tracker
Online Content
Veteran Tracker
H
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,408
Remington-Do those other brands win world championships? Remington's, or copies of Remington's are still, after decades, considered the go to action.

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798562 06/21/15 11:18 AM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,407
W
WileyCoyote Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
W
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,407
IMO, The Remmy 700 reciever is kinda like a small block Chevy V8. Starting with a 265CI in 1955, then a 283CI in 1957, to todays 5 liter....are all off the same original design, only with 65 years of tweaks and tuning tricks.

I've been told by several hundred gunsmiths - from backyard tinkerers to accomplished professionls - in my 50 years of fooling with all kinds of guns and spending 13 years in the wholesale/mfg'er side of the business...thr reason for Remmy's longevity is the simple "pipe within a pipe " design, and everything else came initially as an aftermarket upgrade. The Aftermarket toys developed for the Remmy 700 action have had the most extensive experimentation of any commercial bolt action rifle ever made in America, rivaling the 120 year old Model 98 Mauser design that set the world standard for smokeless powder bolt action rifles.

The ? was though, does that make it the "Best" reciever on the market today ?? IMO Hardly....it is however the easiest and cheapest to work on & a gunsmith's dream of a revenue producer....kinda like the old Chevy Small Block V8...and I won't go into Big Green's shoddy history of production standards & QC, or the numerous lawsuits and Recalls covering mebbe hudreds of thousands of rifles. Or, comparing a 1940's Post War era hard line dial telephone design, same time frame and technology that gave us the Remmy 700, that's been gussied up for a Post 2000 retail market's demands, to an I-Phone.

Lots better guns on the market today...keep looking, you can do better for a Off the Rack production rifle.
JMHO & YMMV
Ron


It is TIME for Term Limits, cause Politicians are like childrens diapers and for the same reasons...Robin Williams

"These are the times that try men's soul's"...Thomas Paine

"Those who fail to learn from History are doomed to repeat it" ....Santayana
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798619 06/21/15 12:33 PM
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46,950
G
Gravytrain Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
G
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 46,950
These days it's almost all good. I like r700's, Rugers and Tikkas.
Probably looking to get a Tikka next.


Upon us all, upon us all, a little rain must fall
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: charlesb] #5798630 06/21/15 12:40 PM
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,206
W
wp75169 Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
W
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 12,206
Originally Posted By: charlesb
. Tikkas are good for longer cartridges, but unnecessarily heavy for compact rounds.




How lite do you want it. It's still lighter than ruger or Remington's offerings. Unnecessary or not.

Tikka < 6.5 lbs
Remington > 7 lbs
Ruger > 7 lbs

Last edited by wp75169; 06/21/15 12:46 PM.
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798649 06/21/15 12:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,453
B
Big Fitz Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
B
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 5,453
Remington. Ask yourself why are they popular for custom builds and you rarely hear of a custom based on a Ruger action. I've had both and all the Remingtons have been better shooters and better triggers out of the box.


Originally Posted by onlysmith&wesson
I was wrong...on anything technical.

Originally Posted by Sailor
Fitz............. is right, ya know............
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798729 06/21/15 02:03 PM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,563
P
patriot07 Online Content
Extreme Tracker
Online Content
Extreme Tracker
P
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,563
Remington if you're wanting to do a ton of upgrades later on and you're really set on those two brands. If upgrades aren't a big deal, go with a Savage if you're on a tight budget, Tikka if you've got some financial flexibility.

Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: wp75169] #5798884 06/21/15 04:28 PM
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,382
N
nsmike Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Content
THF Trophy Hunter
N
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 8,382
Originally Posted By: wp75169
Originally Posted By: charlesb
. Tikkas are good for longer cartridges, but unnecessarily heavy for compact rounds.




How lite do you want it. It's still lighter than ruger or Remington's offerings. Unnecessary or not.

Tikka < 6.5 lbs
Remington > 7 lbs
Ruger > 7 lbs

Valid points but not an issue when the OP is talking about a 300 Winchester Magnum.


for every stereotype there's a prototype don't be the prototype
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5798927 06/21/15 05:10 PM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
T
tth_40 Offline
THF Celebrity
Offline
THF Celebrity
T
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 14,199
I have two Remington 700's left in my collection. Both have sentimental value, and I installed Timney triggers in both of them. Both were built back in the 60's and 70's and are pretty darned accurate with my hand loads.

That being said, the rest that I used to have are now gone and have been replaced with Browning X Bolts, Winchester Mod 70's (pre-'64) and Tikkas. Love the Tikka T3's, to me they are a great value for the money.

I've owned a few Ruger M77's over the years, for me they just didn't feel or shoot right. To each their own.


Originally Posted By: theserxtremedays
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5799046 06/21/15 07:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 813
O
oulufinn Offline
Tracker
Offline
Tracker
O
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 813
I'd have one of the gunsmiths on this site re-barrel, bed and install a Timney trigger to your current Remington 700 rifle. You will not regret it.


NRA Life Member

"The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen" ~ Dennis Prager
Re: Ruger vs Remington [Re: Erny] #5799468 06/22/15 12:37 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,499
C
charlesb Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
C
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,499
The reason why there's so many band-aids out there for Remington rifles is because they so consistently need one.

I'd rather buy a quality item that doesn't have to be worked-over and rebuilt before it is satisfactory.

That's why I've gotten to where I prefer a Browning X-bolt, or a Weatherby Vanguard.

There was a huge aftermarket for Volkswagen Beetles too - but that wasn't because they were what you would call the cream of the crop.

If you want something that is good right out of the box, then something with a big aftermarket for it is a sucker bet.


Kind regards, charlesb


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3