texashuntingforum.com logo
Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
4Notch, Niknoc76, breederbuck33, Breakin25, Jee
72039 Registered Users
Top Posters(All Time)
dogcatcher 110,795
bill oxner 91,416
SnakeWrangler 65,514
stxranchman 60,296
Gravytrain 46,950
RKHarm24 44,585
rifleman 44,461
Stub 43,848
Forum Statistics
Forums46
Topics537,769
Posts9,728,944
Members87,039
Most Online25,604
Feb 12th, 2024
Print Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. #5745900 05/16/15 01:06 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
I traded for a savage action 300 rum from a member here. Got brass dies load data round count etc. I loaded Retumbo under a 208 amax with a cci mag primer starting at 85 gr ladder up to 95 gr in .2 gr increments. First round nothing just firing pin click, primer is dented as it should be. Try again rnd 2 same result. Came home pulled those bullets and I have half burned powder. Never seen this before. I pull them all down start over with wolf mag primers and same loads. (I loaded 338 Lapua rnds with this primer and this powder in similar charges at the same sitting and they are performing fine). Go to shoot the new loads today and nada. Just a dented primer. I tore the firing pin down and checked the spring tension, protrusion etc and seated a primer in an empty brass and boom just fine. Went to shoot again and nothing but a dent. I have not pulled these down yet. I have been reloading for 15 yrs or so and have been able to figure most stuff out. I am going to try some factory ammo next. No reason to doubt this rifle it has fired R22 with the cci primers here. I am using a lee shell holder in a rcbs chucker and not sure if possibly the primer is not seating deep enough but all I use is Lee shell holders and always have.

Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5745935 05/16/15 01:30 AM
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,228
D
dredd Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
D
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,228
First guess is the primer not seated all of the way, but that does not explain the half burnt powder.

I think trying factory ammo is a good idea.

Can you construct a different load with what you have on hand? I.E. Different powder & primer.

Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5745948 05/16/15 01:38 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 5,585
hetman Offline
"Trash Master"
Offline
"Trash Master"
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 5,585
using cci #250 primers ? looking at the Nosler load data for 200 & 210 grain they are buring the retumbo powder at close to your throw weights only difference I see they were using WLRM primers but the CCI 250 should be hotter


[Linked Image]

"Lesser mortals are pitied for the misfortune in not being born Texan."

Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746018 05/16/15 02:18 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Beaubien Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
If the powder was half burned it would indicate the primer went bang.if the primer went bang the bullet should have come out of the case and lodged in the barrel? That's been my experience any way.

If the powder didn't finish burning it makes me think there would be something wrong with the powder. Probably moisture. Are you sure the powder was burnt?

Is it possible that the bolt isn't closing all the way and the firing pin isn't traveling far enough to hit the primer?

Perhaps some pistol primers got used and the pin isn't long enough to travel the minute extra difference in length? A long shot but that all I got.

Edit, one more idea. When processing the brass could the bottom of the primer pocket have been cut deeper?

Last edited by Beaubien; 05/16/15 02:31 AM.


Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746102 05/16/15 03:00 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
I pulled down the three bad ones from today. Had to use an Allen wrench to dig out the crusty burned powder. I took some pics but photobucket is being a bee-atch. The boattail of the bullet is discolored almost burned. Obviously it's a powder problem and I am guessing that Retumbo is more sensitive to moisture than other powders that I have used in the past as this can hasn't been open for much more than a year and I have open powders in the same room that are over 15 yrs old and they work fine. Will have to pull them all down and reload it ith new powder. Probably blow the primers and start over with those too. I guess lesson learned on the moisture sensitivity of Retumbo.

Last edited by westexhunt; 05/16/15 03:00 AM.
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746198 05/16/15 03:55 AM
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Beaubien Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 473
Bizarre. Sure would have thought the bullet would have been lodged a short distance into the barrel.

I'll commit this one to memory.

Glad you got it figured out.



Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746201 05/16/15 03:58 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,633
D
DStroud Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,633
Did the primer make a normal sound? If so yes I would agree bad powder. You said there was nothing so I assumed no sound so the primer did not fire?


"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."

Jack O'Connor 1963
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746220 05/16/15 04:16 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
When I fired a primer in an empty case today it was a loud pop, normal for a primer. I only heard the click as if I dry fired it, when i tried to fire the loaded round but the powder is burned. Will try to post pic.

Last edited by westexhunt; 05/16/15 04:17 AM.
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746232 05/16/15 04:37 AM
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,633
D
DStroud Offline
Extreme Tracker
Offline
Extreme Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,633
So now you have tried two primer brands with same results. Also the powder worked fine in another cartridge.
I am thinking light primer strikes ....maybe headspace issue due to chamber or sizing?
Have you shot a factory round with no issues?


"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."

Jack O'Connor 1963
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746238 05/16/15 04:47 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
Yes two primers on this powder. The powder worked fine in the Lapua (with same wolf primers) but I didn't date the cartridges so not sure when I loaded them, but it was close to the same time). I have not tried factory loads in the 300 rum, could be headspace issue. I will load RUM and Lapua with like charges and components on the same day and see what happens. I marked the lb of retumbo that is involved and will test in the laupa (possibly, don't want to make a bomb).

Last edited by westexhunt; 05/16/15 04:48 AM.
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746246 05/16/15 05:16 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,516
R
RiverRider Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,516
WEIRD problem. You haven't mentioned the scale you're using, have you? Gotta wonder if you're not seeing the effect of a serious undercharge.


[Linked Image]

"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty."

-Augustus McRae
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746251 05/16/15 05:48 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
For single stage loading I use an older rcbs. Think it's a 505. It's getting close to a 100% density charge on the 95gr load, top of my ladder test. I started at 85 gr. it's at/above the bottom of the bottle neck. Every other case (hundreds if not thousands of rounds from 22 hornet to 338 Lapua) I have loaded has been close to book velocity. I weigh bullets regularly to test the scale. No doubt in my charge weight.

Last edited by westexhunt; 05/16/15 05:49 AM.
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746369 05/16/15 01:21 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,407
W
WileyCoyote Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
Offline
THF Trophy Hunter
W
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,407
popcorn
wow what a ???? ....good luck and stay safe
Ron


It is TIME for Term Limits, cause Politicians are like childrens diapers and for the same reasons...Robin Williams

"These are the times that try men's soul's"...Thomas Paine

"Those who fail to learn from History are doomed to repeat it" ....Santayana
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746548 05/16/15 03:43 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,935
C
ChadTRG42 Online Happy
THF Celebrity
Online Happy
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,935
Ok, STOP!!! Do not shoot any more of this ammo. You have a couple serious issues going on here.

First- your load. You are starting your load at 85 grains of Retumbo with a 208 with a CCI #250. The 300 RUM is one of the most aggressive overbore 308 caliber there is. Magnum rounds do not do well with a reduced load. You must be up near max for them to work well, especially with a slow burning powder. Your starting load of 85 grains is lower than my starting data for a 208 is with this round. I would not go less than about 90 to 92 grains. If you plan to reduce the load, switch to a faster burning powder, like R22 or 4831.

Second- your primer. A CCI #250 is a primer with a burn rate hotter than a standard primer, but not as hot as a magnum primer. So it is right between a standard and a magnum primer. You MUST use a hot magnum primer for this 300 RUM ammo with this slow powder. The 2 hottest primers are a Federal 215 and a Remington LR mag primer. You need to run one of these 2 primers for this round.

I have never seen a case with half burned powder like you describe. But what you have going on is a hang fire with too much empty space in the case with a very slow powder and light primer. This is a very bad combination to mess with. If you plan to use Retumbo, work your load up backwards from max. Meaning, if the data shows 95 as max, start a few grain less than that, and work up to 95, maybe a little beyond it. But you would be shooting and wasting ammo starting at 85, and being dangerous doing so.



[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746552 05/16/15 03:46 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,935
C
ChadTRG42 Online Happy
THF Celebrity
Online Happy
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,935
Also, I used to run a CCI #250 primer for my 338 Lapua ammo. I had some primer ignition issues, so I called ATK tech support (CCI and Federal parent company). I spoke to their top engineer for about an hour about primers and such. I had been seating my primers too deep. The proper depth of a primer needs to be .004" to .008" below flush for proper placement for the anvil to be crushed by the firing pin to ignite the primer compound. So, measure your primer seating depth and make sure you are .004" to .008" below flush. I try for .004" to .006" depth on all my ammo.


[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746674 05/16/15 05:21 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
I tried a load with 90gr of Retumbo under a wolf mag primer with the same result. This exact load works perfect in 338 Lapua. Im pretty sure I have a powder issue not a dangerous load issue. It was the cci 250 primer the first round. I pulled down all the first loads that had cci primers after the first problem I thought it was primers So I loaded on the same primers my Lapua runs on (wolf).

I had to edit this posted several times trying to reply on my phone was not working. Please re read if you read this post earlier.

Last edited by westexhunt; 05/16/15 05:38 PM.
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746737 05/16/15 06:14 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
Is Wolf large rifle magnum primer hot enough to light Retumbo in the 300 ultra? Works fine in 338 Lapua.

Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746809 05/16/15 07:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,935
C
ChadTRG42 Online Happy
THF Celebrity
Online Happy
THF Celebrity
C
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 18,935
I don't know, I don't use any foreign primers. They are not worth it. They have much too high failure rate of ignition for my uses.


[Linked Image]
Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
https://DallasReloads.com/
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746950 05/16/15 10:32 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
I've been through about 5,000 wolf small rifle magnum primers in 5.56. No issues. Many many others have had the same experience.

Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5746963 05/16/15 10:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
B
bo3 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
That may be true but now your trying to ignite 3-4x the powder and its a lot slower burning. If it was me, I would want a better primer in the lupa. Those bullets get pricy. You may be getting away with it in the lupa because the powder column is shorter. I'm no expert, just some ideas.
You said you loaded both around the same time correct?

Last edited by bo323; 05/16/15 10:53 PM.
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: bo3] #5746981 05/16/15 10:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,160
J.G. Online Content
THF Celebrity
Online Content
THF Celebrity
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 41,160
popcorn


[Linked Image]
800 Yard Steel Range
Precision Rifle Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5747118 05/17/15 12:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,516
R
RiverRider Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
Online Confused
THF Trophy Hunter
R
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,516
As I am prone to do when I see something like this, I ran QuickLOAD on it.


Code:
Cartridge          : .300 Rem Ultra Mag
Bullet             : .308, 208, Hornady A-MAX 30712
Useable Case Capaci: 101.735 grain H2O = 6.606 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.598 inch = 91.39 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : Hodgdon Retumbo

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-10.0   91    85.50   2639    3217   45425  13232    100.0    1.493
-09.0   92    86.45   2668    3287   47053  13299    100.0    1.469
-08.0   93    87.40   2696    3356   48742  13365    100.0    1.445
-07.0   94    88.35   2723    3425   50496  13430    100.0    1.422
-06.0   95    89.30   2751    3495   52317  13494    100.0    1.399
-05.0   96    90.25   2778    3565   54208  13558    100.0    1.377
-04.0   97    91.20   2806    3635   56163  13620    100.0    1.355  ! Near Maximum !
-03.0   98    92.15   2833    3706   58179  13681    100.0    1.334  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0   99    93.10   2860    3777   60260  13741    100.0    1.313  ! Near Maximum !
-01.0  100    94.05   2886    3848   62413  13800    100.0    1.293  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  101    95.00   2913    3919   64640  13858    100.0    1.273  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.0  102    95.95   2940    3991   66943  13915    100.0    1.253  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0  103    96.90   2966    4063   69327  13971    100.0    1.234  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0  104    97.85   2992    4136   71794  14026    100.0    1.215  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0  105    98.80   3019    4209   74347  14080    100.0    1.197  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0  106    99.75   3045    4282   76991  14132    100.0    1.179  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 5% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 5% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    101    95.00   2969    4072   71973  13619    100.0    1.219  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 5% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    101    95.00   2844    3735   57333  14148    100.0    1.336  ! Near Maximum !


[Linked Image]

"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty."

-Augustus McRae
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5747153 05/17/15 01:02 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 406
R
Rocklock Offline
Bird Dog
Offline
Bird Dog
R
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 406
Sounds like powder gone bad.
TC


The answer is FLINTLOCK! Now, what was the question?

Support the Texas Youth Hunting Program
http://texasyouthhunting.com/
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: RiverRider] #5747259 05/17/15 02:04 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
westexhunt Offline OP
Tracker
OP Offline
Tracker
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
Originally Posted By: RiverRider
As I am prone to do when I see something like this, I ran QuickLOAD on it.


Code:
Cartridge          : .300 Rem Ultra Mag
Bullet             : .308, 208, Hornady A-MAX 30712
Useable Case Capaci: 101.735 grain H2O = 6.606 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 3.598 inch = 91.39 mm
Barrel Length      : 24.0 inch = 609.6 mm
Powder             : Hodgdon Retumbo

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 1.0% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-10.0   91    85.50   2639    3217   45425  13232    100.0    1.493
-09.0   92    86.45   2668    3287   47053  13299    100.0    1.469
-08.0   93    87.40   2696    3356   48742  13365    100.0    1.445
-07.0   94    88.35   2723    3425   50496  13430    100.0    1.422
-06.0   95    89.30   2751    3495   52317  13494    100.0    1.399
-05.0   96    90.25   2778    3565   54208  13558    100.0    1.377
-04.0   97    91.20   2806    3635   56163  13620    100.0    1.355  ! Near Maximum !
-03.0   98    92.15   2833    3706   58179  13681    100.0    1.334  ! Near Maximum !
-02.0   99    93.10   2860    3777   60260  13741    100.0    1.313  ! Near Maximum !
-01.0  100    94.05   2886    3848   62413  13800    100.0    1.293  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  101    95.00   2913    3919   64640  13858    100.0    1.273  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+01.0  102    95.95   2940    3991   66943  13915    100.0    1.253  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.0  103    96.90   2966    4063   69327  13971    100.0    1.234  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+03.0  104    97.85   2992    4136   71794  14026    100.0    1.215  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.0  105    98.80   3019    4209   74347  14080    100.0    1.197  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+05.0  106    99.75   3045    4282   76991  14132    100.0    1.179  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 5% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 5% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    101    95.00   2969    4072   71973  13619    100.0    1.219  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 5% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    101    95.00   2844    3735   57333  14148    100.0    1.336  ! Near Maximum !


Thank you. My original work up from 85 in increments doesn't seem too far fetched. Whatever the reason I loaded bad powder is the most reasonable explanation. Plenty of critics of the wolf primers and I will try federal to rule that out but it will be under new Retumbo. I am not the only reloader in the country that has reloaded with wolf primers.

Last edited by westexhunt; 05/17/15 02:10 AM.
Re: Powder ignition problem (or rifle problem) not sure. [Re: westexhunt] #5747290 05/17/15 02:34 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
B
bo3 Offline
Pro Tracker
Offline
Pro Tracker
B
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,053
Originally Posted By: westexhunt
I traded for a savage action 300 rum from a member here. Got brass dies load data round count etc. I loaded Retumbo under a 208 amax with a cci mag primer starting at 85 gr ladder up to 95 gr in .2 gr increments. First round nothing just firing pin click, primer is dented as it should be. Try again rnd 2 same result. Came home pulled those bullets and I have half burned powder. Never seen this before. I pull them all down start over with wolf mag primers and same loads. (I loaded 338 Lapua rnds with this primer and this powder in similar charges at the same sitting and they are performing fine). Go to shoot the new loads today and nada. Just a dented primer. I tore the firing pin down and checked the spring tension, protrusion etc and seated a primer in an empty brass and boom just fine. Went to shoot again and nothing but a dent. I have not pulled these down yet. I have been reloading for 15 yrs or so and have been able to figure most stuff out. I am going to try some factory ammo next. No reason to doubt this rifle it has fired R22 with the cci primers here. I am using a lee shell holder in a rcbs chucker and not sure if possibly the primer is not seating deep enough but all I use is Lee shell holders and always have.


If both were loaded at the same time with the same powder and one is working fine, then I wouldn't think its the powder.

On second thought it could be the powder is messed up just enough to cause problems in the 300 but I would think accuracy would suffer in the lapua.

Last edited by bo323; 05/17/15 02:40 AM.
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

© 2004-2024 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3