Main Menu
Newest Members
IthinkIhearsumtin, Jara, Holtboy02, Whippp, Angie A
62657 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 83246
stxranchman 52093
RWH24 44568
rifleman 44267
BOBO the Clown 42730
bill oxner 41004
BMD 40619
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 34818
sig226fan ( 31414
Forum Stats
62657 Members
46 Forums
438225 Topics
6036044 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Topic Options
#5653157 - 03/16/15 08:11 AM Mule deer bullet selectio
SpoonPlatoon Online   content
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 02/24/07
Posts: 8107
Loc: Palestine
Hey guys. Just got word that I'll be going to Montana for a mule deer/whitetail hunt in November.

I'll be rolling my own ammo for this one. Shots should be around 300 possibly out to 500. Shooting a 1975 Remington 700 in 30-06. I was thinking about going with a 180gr barns triple shock or a nosler partition. Any other suggestions or thoughts on the above bullets?

"I shoot ducks." - me

#5653235 - 03/16/15 09:08 AM Re: Mule deer bullet selectio [Re: SpoonPlatoon]
BIGDOG1956 Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 10/26/09
Posts: 319
Both of those bullets are good. I hunt mule deer with a 30\06 and 300 wsm with a 165 grain ballistic silvertip.
This is a coated bullet and it gives me more velocity, and the ballistic tip opens well up at long ranges.

#5653264 - 03/16/15 09:41 AM Re: Mule deer bullet selectio [Re: SpoonPlatoon]
JRJ6 Offline
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 03/13/14
Posts: 4003
Loc: Dallas, TX
I run Barnes and Nosler in my 30.06 and have never had any issues with either one.
Good luck on your hunt!

#5653300 - 03/16/15 09:58 AM Re: Mule deer bullet selectio [Re: SpoonPlatoon]
redchevy Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 10/25/04
Posts: 26311
Loc: Texas
If you go with the barnes I would would drop down to the lightest weight you can, 180 grain out of a 30-06 is too heavy/slow especially for shots at distance.
It's hell eatin em live

#5653336 - 03/16/15 10:20 AM Re: Mule deer bullet selectio [Re: SpoonPlatoon]
papa45 Online   content

Registered: 05/14/07
Posts: 584
Loc: Arlington
I'd go with a 165 Accubond or Ballistic Tip if you're serious about 3-500 yards.

#5654222 - 03/16/15 08:31 PM Re: Mule deer bullet selectio [Re: SpoonPlatoon]
30378 Offline

Registered: 02/14/09
Posts: 2849
Loc: Deer Park, Tx.
Yup! The 165 Accubond is my go-to 30 cal bullet.
NRA Patron Life Member - Free men should not be subjected to permits, paperwork and taxation in order to carry a firearm.

#5654317 - 03/16/15 09:16 PM Re: Mule deer bullet selectio [Re: SpoonPlatoon]
Big Fitz Online   content
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 12/06/09
Posts: 2243
Loc: McKinney, TX
Yep, Barnes need to be run light for caliber to really be effective. I would opt for the Accubond or something similar that provides the accuracy you desire at long range to include the devastation needed for a hunting bullet.
Originally Posted By: syncerus
I prefer to think of myself as a control enthusiast. wink

#5655654 - 03/17/15 08:00 PM Re: Mule deer bullet selectio [Re: SpoonPlatoon]
BIGDOG1956 Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 10/26/09
Posts: 319
The Ballistic Silvertip Bullet and the Accubond are the same bullet basically the only difference's is the
Accubond is bonded to the jacket for controlled expansion and the silver tip is coated for a little higher speed.
The barnes is a longer bullet and is made of copper and most hunters go with a smaller size for more velocity.
I have used the Ballistic Silvertip, the Partition and Barnes.
I would try some in my rife and see what shoots best.

Edited by BIGDOG1956 (03/17/15 10:11 PM)
Edit Reason: gramer

#5659730 - 03/20/15 05:57 AM Re: Mule deer bullet selectio [Re: SpoonPlatoon]
Rocklock Offline
Bird Dog

Registered: 08/09/10
Posts: 397
Loc: Cedar Valley, Travis Co., TX

I've used both 150 & 180 gr. in the .30-06. I used the 180s when hunting both mulies and elk the same season.
The answer is FLINTLOCK! Now, what was the question?

Support the Texas Youth Hunting Program


© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide