Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
family hunt, ATM04, Basso1964, outdoorlife1984, Daggaboy42
62662 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 83256
stxranchman 52093
RWH24 44568
rifleman 44268
BOBO the Clown 42730
bill oxner 41041
BMD 40619
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 34827
sig226fan (Rguns.com) 31414
facebook
Forum Stats
62662 Members
46 Forums
438287 Topics
6036774 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Topic Options
#5565354 - 01/26/15 11:18 AM Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets
tenyearsgone Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 1389
Figured some might be interested in how some combos might perform in your weapon. These are the ones that were sub moa out of the 14-15 different loads I tested.




Barrel: 16" 1:8 Rainier Select medium contour
Optic: Leupold VX3 2.5x8



55 grain Nosler Varmageddon BT
21.7 IMR 4198
COAL: 2.250
Group: .238

55 grain Nosler Varmageddon FBHP
27.4 CFE 223
COAL: 2.210
Group: .398

75 grain BTHP
21.4 AR Comp
COAL: 2.255
Group: .55

75 grain BTHP
23 IMR 8208 xbr
COAL: 2.255
Group: .695

55 grain soft point
26.3 748
COAL: 2.20
Group: .476

77 Sierra match
22.1 AR Comp
COAL: 2.26
Group: .417

55 grain Sierra Gameking
25.6 AR Comp
COAL: 2.245
Group: .588

75 grain BTHP
25 CFE 223
COAL: 2.26
Group: .798
Test more. Two holes were touching while 1 was farther.

Top
#5565510 - 01/26/15 12:46 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 09/16/09
Posts: 11492
Loc: Lewisville, TX
What brass and primer are you running? Some of those loads are very similar to my results also.
_________________________

Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
www.DallasReloads.com
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL

Top
#5565944 - 01/26/15 05:33 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
tenyearsgone Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 1389
Most of it is Lake City brass with a mix of Winchester, CCI, and Remington primers. Mostly Winchester as the CCI primers can be tough to seat in the military brass and Remington isn't as common in the store.

I was surprised Varget didn't do well.

Top
#5565967 - 01/26/15 05:55 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 09/16/09
Posts: 11492
Loc: Lewisville, TX
When you tested Varget, what was your method?
_________________________

Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
www.DallasReloads.com
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL

Top
#5566006 - 01/26/15 06:11 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
Buzzsaw Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 10300
Loc: Frisco, Texas
Interesting about the Varget, what load were you running? My 20" 9 twist like 24.0 gr with the 77 SMK.

I will grab some AR Comp and CFE, I think I saw some last week.

Thanks for the info.
_________________________
"I ain't here for a long time, I'm here for a good time"
King George Strait



Top
#5566172 - 01/26/15 07:17 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
tenyearsgone Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 1389
55 grain with 27.5 grains of Varget. 2.25 COAL.

I guess it's important to note that I didn't get to it until at the end of my 3 hour session and was experiencing some eye fatigue. I was also rushing these shots somewhat.

I'm not sure it can beat the CFE 223 or 4198 loads anyways, so no loss if it doesn't work. I still have some IMR 4064 loads to test so I'll try it again next time.

Top
#5566457 - 01/26/15 09:18 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
kmon1 Online   content
junior

Registered: 09/27/06
Posts: 22267
Loc: Texas
Only one of those I have used so far is CFE. Use it in the 17 Remington. Good accuracy and velocity. What I really like though is not having to clean out copper, run 25gr bullets at over 4200fps things will foul.
_________________________
Guidelines / Rules of Conduct
http://www.texashuntingforum.com/rules.htm

RULES for using the TRADING POST
http://texashuntingforum.com/forum/ubbth..._PO#Post6605808

Top
#5566853 - 01/27/15 08:06 AM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 09/16/09
Posts: 11492
Loc: Lewisville, TX
If you just pick a powder charge to try, there's no way of knowing how well it will shoot. A proper load work up should find a good load.
_________________________

Custom and Precision Ammunition!!
www.DallasReloads.com
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL

Top
#5566928 - 01/27/15 08:49 AM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
tenyearsgone Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 1389
I'd shot it with an unmagnified Aimpoint before and it did decent. I have several loads with Varget to try. Just didn't get to them. It might do better with heavier bullets. At this point, it's just to see what works so I can use up the pound I have while getting decent accuracy. I really like IMR 4198 because of the accuracy and soft recoil even though it can really only be loaded with a trickler. Varget is scarce here anyways.

The good thing about my setup is that I'm not relegated to one powder.

Top
#5567505 - 01/27/15 01:52 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
Buzzsaw Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 10300
Loc: Frisco, Texas
AR COMP for the heavies? Closer to Varget burn rate?
_________________________
"I ain't here for a long time, I'm here for a good time"
King George Strait



Top
#5567521 - 01/27/15 02:01 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
DStroud Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 11/02/11
Posts: 1586
Loc: Waco
AR Comp seems to be a cleaner more stable version of Reloder 15 with slightly faster burn rate. From my experience.
I like it better than Varget.

Top
#5567803 - 01/27/15 04:48 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: tenyearsgone]
Buzzsaw Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 06/29/11
Posts: 10300
Loc: Frisco, Texas
good to know I have a pound coming to try with 69-77 grain bullets
_________________________
"I ain't here for a long time, I'm here for a good time"
King George Strait



Top
#5568518 - 01/27/15 11:00 PM Re: Load testing results for those interested in the newer powders and heavier .224 bullets [Re: DStroud]
tenyearsgone Offline
Pro Tracker

Registered: 04/21/13
Posts: 1389
You'll like the AR Comp better since it has shorter granules than Varget. Better for using a measure.

Top



© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide