Forums46
Topics537,021
Posts9,719,489
Members86,987
|
Most Online25,604 Feb 12th, 2024
|
|
|
Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
#5561450
01/24/15 05:12 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
I have a pet load for 2 of my .223 Rem rifles that shoot true .75MOA all day, every day. I'm happy with it but....
The SD numbers are 27.4 over 12 shots, and 26.2 over 20 rounds. 2 different rifles. One rifle a 24" and the other a 20", both 1:9 twist. I'm happy with the load, it seems to work well but WHY are these numbers so bad? What can I do to lower them and get more consistent velocities? I use the same equipment and techniques that produce a SD of 9 in my favorite 270 load.
I'm using a RCBS Chargemaster to drop charges, and have check weights and use them. Scale seems accurate enough to a grain or 2 of powder per .1g.
Different powder? I'm using 24.5 Varget in front of a 69 Sierra. If I understand SD, this means my velocities are not consistent at all.
Any ideas?
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561496
01/24/15 05:49 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,809
Cleric
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,809 |
have you tried moving a bit up or down to see if you find a load that your gun likes more...
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561498
01/24/15 05:55 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
Yes, I originally found this load by doing.3 grain increments with 5 shot groups, selecting for accuracy and group size.
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561572
01/24/15 11:18 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124
postoak
Veteran Tracker
|
Veteran Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,124 |
Is the .223 bullet not crimped and the .270 crimped?
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561606
01/24/15 12:58 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,622
DStroud
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,622 |
Neck tension is probably the biggest factor which ties to consistent brass. All the brass the same? Trimmed the same. I would prep 20 pieces as close as possible also using a busshing or a Lee collet die can help maintain good neck but not totally nessasary if your expander is smooth.
"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."
Jack O'Connor 1963
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561611
01/24/15 01:03 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,782
GasGuzzler
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 6,782 |
If it shoots that good I wouldn't care. The paper doesn't lie.
Pass the gravy.
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: GasGuzzler]
#5561683
01/24/15 02:06 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,582
decook
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,582 |
If it shoots that good I wouldn't care. The paper doesn't lie. And that is what really matters. I can understand solving this puzzle because it gives you confidence in your next shot. But in the end if you are getting the accuracy you want and expect at the ranges you require then you can relegate the SD spreads to a lesser priority in your load development. I went down this same rabbit hole back in my old competition days. I would take a perfectly fine shooting load and totally screw it up by constantly changing darned near everything I could to get the SD into low single digits. I finally learned that single digit SD is not necessarily a requirement to accuracy shooting - but trigger time is. It took a lot of lead and powder for me to learn it though. Check out this wikipedia link so you are sure of what you are trying to solve, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_deviationSo then, the list of things to try is long, and in your case some are limiting (such as COAL), but here are a few things you can try to tighten that SD. 1. Cartridge OAL 2. Primer 3. De-burring the primer flash hole 4. Case neck brass thickness uniforming 5. Uniform brass neck hardness (annealing) 6. Indexing brass, but may be somewhat impractical in a semi-auto 7. Weighing brass 8. Only shooting development loads on same temp/density altitude days 9. Changing lots of powders 10. Changing powder 11. Add more to the list that I can't think of right off the top of my head I didn't go back to my notes, and these were not in any particular order, but you can start to see the level of absurdity I was going towards that never materialized in a better score or more silhouettes hitting the dirt. I reasoned that the proper way of going about this is to completely eliminate every variable YOU can eliminate, and then only modify those things that you cannot. I even went as far as developing loads through one single brass case. And in the end, all I did was get tired of it. I got my SD into single digits, but the accuracy wasn't really any (or much) better than it already was. I chased my tail right into the hole of diminishing returns.
Press for an AMERICAN.
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561736
01/24/15 02:47 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 13,409
jdk1985
THF Celebrity
|
THF Celebrity
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 13,409 |
I'm using 24.5 Varget in front of a 69 Sierra.
Any ideas?
My first suggestion is to put the bullet in front of the powder... that might make a world of difference! Problem solved
Instagram @justinkingwoodworking
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561754
01/24/15 02:57 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
Thanks for the comments and knowledge. Solving these kind of puzzles is fun to me, although I do understand the load does work, and works well across several rifles! not just mine.
From the Wiki link: a high standard deviation indicates that the data points are spread out over a large range of values. Yep, I got that in this load. I see total velocity spreads of 96 FPS across 20 rounds. There is a problem, and I think it will shoot more consistently if I can find the cause. And as we all know, consistency is accuracy.
I'm using Lapua brass, trimmed using a Redding trim die, one set of brass had just been trimmed, and the other set due for a trim this time across the bench. I did notice while trimming that this Lapua brass has some variation in neck thickness, but not much. CCI BR4 primer.
I neck size using a Lee Collet die, set where the press just breaks over for consistency in this step. I'll admit, I think this is where I will find my solution. Neck Tension. maybe need to modify the mandrel slightly to increase neck tension. The 270 rounds did offer more resistance during the seating operation. Would consistent light seating tension cause this? The bullets are not loose. And I seat with a Forster Seater die, no crimp. I'm doing everything I know to do to produce consistent ammo. BTW, these are Rem 700 bolt rifles.
I do understand this is a rabbit hole, and this is my first attempt to fix this. I've got a couple new ideas, thanks to you guys.
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: jdk1985]
#5561759
01/24/15 03:01 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
I'm using 24.5 Varget in front of a 69 Sierra.
Any ideas?
My first suggestion is to put the bullet in front of the powder... that might make a world of difference! Problem solved problem solved!
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561840
01/24/15 04:03 PM
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,622
DStroud
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,622 |
I would try the collet die setup the way the instructions show (not camming over) and see if that helps
Annealing if you have not would make a difference as well
Last edited by DStroud; 01/24/15 04:05 PM.
"Anyone taking up handloading necessarily plays with unknown factors and takes chances. But so does anyone who drives a car,goes to a cocktail party,eats in a restaurant,or gets married."
Jack O'Connor 1963
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5561887
01/24/15 04:42 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 406
Rocklock
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 406 |
Inconsistent neck tension seems most likely. TC
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5562030
01/24/15 06:50 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,442
kmon11
junior
|
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,442 |
Rick you are using good equipment, what are the inside of the neck measurements on sized brass? Are they consistent? If not we have a sizing issue.
96 fps is a big swing and a SD of 24 like you and others have seen might cause some accuracy loss at 100 yards it will be worse the further out you get.
Are you just dropping to your charge weight with the chargemaster or drop a few tenths low then trickle in the remaining? The smaller the case volume of a cartridge the more critical this becomes.
I know it can be frustrating but try eliminating one thing at a time.
lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true Mainstream news might be fun to watch
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5562113
01/24/15 07:51 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
I think we do have a sizing issue. The mandrel in the Lee Collet die is .220, and the case mouths range from.220 to .224. Hard to measure accurately with a caliper, but I can see that there are inconsistencies in diameter within individual cases by .001, and a few .002.
Maybe I should stop camming it over lightly, as it doesn't seem to be putting enough pressure on the sizing collet. It's tempting to blame Richard Lee, but I won't. I did pop the alum retaining cap out early on putting too much pressure on the handle. Had to replace the cap. I wish a Lee collet would size without decapping. :-(
I let the Chargemaster drop the load, and then wait for the weight after the count before I touch the scale. I do not tricle the last few grains.
I will modify my neck sizing technique and see if my numbers change. Should I just go to a Redding S type die?
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: kmon11]
#5562140
01/24/15 08:16 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,582
decook
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4,582 |
96 FPS is a pretty big swing in 20 shots. I think you're already on the best thing to try first, re-adjusting the collet die like you said earlier.
Just a thought, have you shot across a different chrono or longer ranges by chance to verify that is what you are really getting? I know that large of a swing would also show up in an unknown hit from a called shot break. JBM sez that 96 fps is only .1MOA elevation difference at 100 yds, so that's hardle noticible but like kmon1 wrote it sure would at longer distances.
PS - good equipment.
Press for an AMERICAN.
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5562173
01/24/15 08:40 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,442
kmon11
junior
|
junior
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 32,442 |
Rick you could get one of the universal decapping dies and decap before sizing, lots of folks do that so when cleaning the cases prior to sizing, they can get the primer pockets cleaned as well, especially those using SS media and sonic cleaners.
The collet dies do a good job but remember it takes 25lbs of force applied so with the press camming over you might not be getting the consistency. Try not camming it over on some cases and see if that doesn't get those measurements more consistent.
lf the saying "Liar, Liar your pants on fire" were true Mainstream news might be fun to watch
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5562196
01/24/15 09:01 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
Thanks guys! I think I have a plan. I appreciate all the help! I will report on progress. I can't be the first to need this info.
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5563415
01/25/15 05:50 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,165
Judd
#1 Creedmoor Fan
|
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,165 |
Consistent necks after sizing is what I would look at first. The second is primers.
For a swing that large sizing is where I would look the hardest, I would bet you have something going on with your necks. Size 10-20 and then start measuring for consistency. Also, in my experience lessen neck tension to help. I rarely use more than .002 neck tension...not saying there aren't loads that will shoot tighter tensions I just normally don't search there.
I use primers to fine tune things...just as an example, I recently increased the speed of one of my loads and it appears to be shooting pretty good, yesterday I ran it on a chrono Fed match versus Win and the difference was SD14 and SD18 respectively.
For those that never shoot over 3-400 yards SD and ES isn't important but if you stretch one out further you will see a difference and the load you have right now no matter how good it shoots at 100 will be crap at 600+ yards. Good luck...fwiw, I'm not overly happy with a SD of 14. I like to have the SD under 10...the awesome bench gun that I have SD is 2-3.
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5563676
01/25/15 08:13 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,809
Cleric
Extreme Tracker
|
Extreme Tracker
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,809 |
With a sample size that large can you post a histogram of the data? If you can can you post the raw number?
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5564195
01/26/15 01:49 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
I normally shoot at 100 yards, and occasionally shoot longer distances, so it really doesn't matter, except that it does, if you want to create premium ammunition. I already loaded a few to take to the range this week using the Collet die, and consistent pressure on the handle. I can't measure that force, which is why I was trying to cam the die. I think that is the problem. I can see how my method could very well cause the problem.
I know the chrono will drive you crazy chasing unseen problems, but I'll take it over guessing velocity from a loading manual. Cleric, I will PM you the data, it makes an ugly post.
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5567567
01/27/15 08:33 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
Well fellow THFrs, modifying my method on the collet die didn't change a thing. How disappointing! I'm gonna check my chargemaster against a beam scale next. I tried to figure out the Redding bushing die sizing info and it just gave me a headache. Maybe I should micro adjust my FL sizing die and let the expander ball take care of it. ??? Or maybe dump Varget. CRAP. LOL
Series 5 Shots: 20 Min 2768 Max 2858 Avg 2803 S-D 21.5 ES 90
Beautiful range day here in DFW. Took a Korean era Garand with me, so it's been a fun day!
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5567785
01/27/15 10:38 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,165
Judd
#1 Creedmoor Fan
|
#1 Creedmoor Fan
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,165 |
Redding bushing dies sizing is easy at the step your at, when you don't have compenents is when it is hard. Take on of your loaded shells and measure outside of the neck...subtract .001 or .002 and that is the neck bushing you need.
Your charge consistency could definitely be an issue but I really doubt it would cause that big of a swing. I'm still leaning toward necks.
Something I just thought of....are you crunching powder with those loads? I ask because if you are crunching powder it could be pushing the bullets out over nite and causing you to have significant swings in OAL which could cause it too. Just a thought...
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5568288
01/28/15 02:32 AM
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,502
RiverRider
THF Trophy Hunter
|
THF Trophy Hunter
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,502 |
I'd try another primer, but you'll basically be back to square one with load development.
"Arguing with you always makes me thirsty." -Augustus McRae
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5568967
01/28/15 03:47 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147
RickC
OP
Pro Tracker
|
OP
Pro Tracker
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,147 |
Thanks for the suggestions gentlemen! I developed this load using CCI-41 primers. Switched to CCI-BR and the groups got noticeably smaller. I did not do another development phase when I switched. It shot good, and then great! No Chrono at that time. Seemed to help, got tighter groups by prob 15%.
I think I'll look for a new neck sizing die. I was noticing lots of variation in my outside case neck dimensions during this analysis. The Lee collet fingers (4 of them), could cause this, Lee even suggests you size twice and turn the case 90 degrees in between press strokes. I tried that suggestion with the last 20.
I'm going to go away for awhile and work on this. If I find it, I will let you all know. Thanks for your time and knowledge! She still shoots great!
NRA Life Member
|
|
|
Re: Why are my load Standard Deviation numbers bad?
[Re: RickC]
#5571681
01/29/15 10:27 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 337
Phlash
Bird Dog
|
Bird Dog
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 337 |
Not to change the subject on tension, but have you checked concentricity it of your reloads? You may not be entering the lands squarely on all your loads. I try to stay under .003
|
|
|
Moderated by bigbob_ftw, CCBIRDDOGMAN, Chickenman, Derek, DeRico, Duck_Hunter, hetman, jeh7mmmag, JustWingem, kmon11, kry226, kwrhuntinglab, Payne, pertnear, rifleman, sig226fan (Rguns.com), Superduty, TreeBass, txcornhusker
|