Main Menu
Advertisement
Affiliates
Advertisement
Newest Members
AA0605, HookEm01, Gambler 25-06, JWRivette, Adchunts
60416 Registered Users
Top Posters
dogcatcher 77340
stxranchman 52092
RWH24 44568
rifleman 43778
BOBO the Clown 41084
BMD 40539
Big Orn 37484
txshntr 33682
bill oxner 32587
sig226fan (Rguns.com) 30560
facebook
Forum Stats
60416 Members
45 Forums
475616 Topics
6239225 Posts

Max Online: 16728 @ 03/25/12 08:51 AM
Topic Options
#5526547 - 01/07/15 07:22 PM sorting bullet weight??
daniel1381 Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 03/07/12
Posts: 3497
Loc: longview texas
Does sorting bullet weight really make a diff?
Got a box of amax and noticed the diffrence of bullet weight from one bullet to the next
_________________________
"From my cold dead hands"

"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

Benjamin Franklin


Top
#5526817 - 01/07/15 08:55 PM Re: sorting bullet weight?? [Re: daniel1381]
FiremanJG Offline
THF Celebrity

Registered: 12/16/08
Posts: 17893
Loc: Wolfe City, TX
Those are good bullets and don't tend to vary enough to justify sorting them. If there's 25 out of 100 that are .3 gr off what are you going to do with them? Not shoot them? Try to get a new trajectory for them?

Nope
_________________________


800 Yard Steel Rifle Range
Long Range Shooting Instruction
Memberships and Classes Available


Top
#5526848 - 01/07/15 09:10 PM Re: sorting bullet weight?? [Re: daniel1381]
wburke2010 Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 06/26/13
Posts: 4687
Loc: Nevada, TX
IMHO the only time to really get anal that bad is when you are shooting bench rest and can really really shoot good when every little tiny detail could give you that small margin over the next guy.

For the shooting that I do that little bit of difference is not going to change anything when the steel plates are a decent sized. Knowing the wind is a better option. Which I need to work on. Ymmv.

Walter

Top
#5526852 - 01/07/15 09:15 PM Re: sorting bullet weight?? [Re: daniel1381]
daniel1381 Offline
Veteran Tracker

Registered: 03/07/12
Posts: 3497
Loc: longview texas
Ok sounds good..thx for the input
_________________________
"From my cold dead hands"

"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain - and most fools do."

Benjamin Franklin


Top
#5526875 - 01/07/15 09:28 PM Re: sorting bullet weight?? [Re: daniel1381]
wburke2010 Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 06/26/13
Posts: 4687
Loc: Nevada, TX
When I had a 284. I was shooting the 162 Amax. First time out with the rifle I took it out to 800 and back shooting at every 100 yards. Never missed a best. The 162 is an awesome bullet. Load them up and shoot them till you run out. up

Walter

Top
#5527739 - 01/08/15 10:53 AM Re: sorting bullet weight?? [Re: daniel1381]
ChadTRG42 Offline
THF Trophy Hunter

Registered: 09/16/09
Posts: 9397
Loc: Lewisville, TX
If are trying to attain the extra bit of accuracy to break a world record, sure it might be worth it. But for your common hunting or long range shooting, no. If I were to weigh anything, it would be the actual case and sort them by weight. But it's a PITA to do and keep separated. I worry more about practicing and making good wind calls more than anything else.
_________________________

www.DallasReloads.com
Type 01 and Type 06 FFL

Top
#5527796 - 01/08/15 11:18 AM Re: sorting bullet weight?? [Re: daniel1381]
dee Online   content
Extreme Tracker

Registered: 04/10/10
Posts: 4664
Loc: Red River way
I concur with the gents above. Unless in BR and likely with a open comp rail gun most won't be able to shoot the difference.
_________________________
"A vote is like a rifle; it's usefulness depends on the character of the user" Theodore Roosevelt

Top
#5527921 - 01/08/15 11:59 AM Re: sorting bullet weight?? [Re: daniel1381]
Judd Online   content


Registered: 01/22/09
Posts: 10748
Loc: Sachse, TX
If I have to sort bullets then I'm not using good bullets...fyi, I haven't shot amaxs in a realy long time and don't really have an opinion on them.

I pretty much use Berger hybrids or custom bullets and I don't sort. I used to sort via bearing length and weight but it got to the point where I had 1 big pile with 2-3 bullets that were darn close. So I just load'em and shoot'em though.

I will say the old Sierra 107 MatchKings were worth sorting. I know they have recently released a new pointed (not tipped but pointed) version that if they are more consistent or as consistent as the Berger's I'll try them.

I do shoot BR (not small groups in paper though) and I plan to shoot some tactical stuff this year. My motto has always been I'll strive to have the best shooting/tuned rifle at every match. The reason is I know I'm not the best shooter (wind reader) there and I hope that will give me just a slight advantage to screw up a wind read and still come away with some cash. So rest assured if I thought I could gain an advantage by sorting bullets over my competitors I would...I just don't find it's worth the time spent for no more bad ones that I found. If I was retired and had nothing to do I might but time is my biggest enemy on getting stuff done.
_________________________
Originally Posted By: Phil Robertson
Don't let your ears hear what your eyes didn't see, and don't let your mouth say what your heart doesn't feel

Top



© 2004-2016 OUTDOOR SITES NETWORK all rights reserved USA and Worldwide